Hello ACCMailers ...
For the record, the FAQ Maintainers mailing list
(which we discovered recently had been dead for years)
was revived last month.
The subscription address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the subscription command is
subscribe faq-maintainers
::: SZS :::
Hello ACCMailers ...
Here is a reminder of the problem of updating the ACCMAIL FAQ.
It is published initially on news.answers and other newsgroups,
then propagated to web sites such as
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/internet-services/access-via-email/
The published FAQ is years out of date
From:Sun Zoom Spark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right now, there is a weekly automated posting to alt.bbs.internet,
alt.online-service, alt.internet.services, alt.answers, comp.mail.misc,
comp.answers, news.answers, and news.newusers.questions. The posts to the
usenet *answers groups ensure that
Lena is right!
On 8 Sep 2004 at 16:23, Lena from Kiev wrote:
I don't think so. Today
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/internet-services/access-via-email
begins from header containing:
Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FAQ is posted by the mit.edu FAQ server, not by expita.com.
The
[Sun Zoom Spark [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tue, 7 Sep 2004 03:17:21 +0100]:
I would ask him if I could -- but all mail to expita.com bounces, so I can't
ask him, and now I don't think it is necessary. I see no obstacle to editing
the current FAQ as version 11. I'm sure Gerry would agree.
To
On 7 Sep 2004 at 16:57, Albert Reiner wrote:
To prevent a similar situation in the future, it might be a good idea
to put some notes into the new version stating under what conditions
people may modify and redistribute the text. (Just pointing to some
well-known licence might be sufficient.)
On 2 Sep 2004 at 17:35, Frits Westra wrote:
I'd rather not translate the current FAQ with superseded information. It's
unclear to me whether you'll ask Gerry for permission to edit the English
version. Or do you have other intentions with it?
You are right -- version 10 really is old.
Gerry
