http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9245
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 01:52 ---
Tried it. (echo shutdown /sys/power/disk echo disk /sys/power/state).
The result is different but quite not satisfactory... the fan stays everytime
on at the lower speed.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9432
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|9243|
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9432
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 07:12 ---
When you get these messages, does the fan finally go 'off' after some time?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 07:59 ---
I have a similar laptop (t43p) with similar problems; it only resumes correctly
if I boot with highres=off,nohz=off. Problems started with 2.6.21, which
produced hangs wiht
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=14011)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14011action=view)
My kernel config - t43p
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=14010)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14010action=view)
lspci for t43p
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:22 ---
Hmmm... no idea. I think that the kernel that loads the hibernation image must
be the same as the hibernated one; I suspected it would be a massive hack on
the boot scripts... I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:28 ---
On openSUSE that depends on which modules are loaded from the initrd. If the
processor and thermal modules are not present in the initrd, they are only
loaded afterwards, when
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6539
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
Summary|Fan not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:21 ---
Rebooted with 2.6.24-rc5, nohz, highres. I could s2ram without problem for 10
times. I then suspended2disk once, also without problem. After that however,
resuming after s2ram
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:26 ---
boot 2.6.24.rc4
echo mem /sys/power/state
echo devices /sys/power/pm_test
echo mem /sys/power/state
That sequence brings the Touchpad back to live!
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:34 ---
I have to mention that my config also contained the hdaps module compiled
into the kernel (I mean statically and not as a module). And I also confirm
that I have
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:51 ---
I'm not sure if we can change the reporter, but that shouldn't matter (if you
don't mind receiving emails from the bugzilla, that is).
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: crash loading acpi_cpufreq
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258641
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347637
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347637#c3
Brandon Philips [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9399
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 17:40 ---
For comment #23 and #24, it seems that the problem is similar to bug 9399.
Jonathan and Hernan, is the problem fixed?
Alexey, could you have a look at this problem please?
--
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347637
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347637#c4
Rui Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 19:07 ---
Yes, the problem is fixed.
_T_0 changed to T_0 gets rid of all but one of the errors.
Field (PLPT, DWordAcc, Lock, Preserve)
change-- Field (PLPT, ByteAcc, Lock,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 19:10 ---
Hi, Stian
From the info in comment #51 and #55 it seems that the boot option of
acpi_irq_nobalance and the patch in comment #29 have the same meaning. The
won't change the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 20:17 ---
rantGees... the initial _GTM value should be collected after device presence
detection (for crap VIA ACPI implementations) but before configuration is
changed./rant
Will prep
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 20:26 ---
Okay, we can't do that. I think what we should do here is telling the ACPI
interpreter to shut up even if something blows up. I'm forwarding patches
upstream now. Other than
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 20:30 ---
I thought that Torsten was saying that the ACPI errors went away with the
latest patch?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 20:39 ---
Yeah, but that would break acpi cable detection for pata_amd. I'll write about
it in detail to lkml, linux-ide and linux-acpi and cc you. Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6038
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #29 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8674
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 21:48 ---
Will you please try it with boot option of pci=nommconf besides the tests in
comment #7?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13986|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5044
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6117
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7783
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7783
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8674
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 23:55 ---
Both.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8674
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 23:47 ---
Hi,
Sorry, but my english is not s ogood. COuld you clarify for me should I run the
kernel like this:
pnpacpi=off pci=nommconf
or just like this:
pci=nommconf
Or should I
40 matches
Mail list logo