http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
Matthew Wilcox matt...@wil.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
Matthew Wilcox matt...@wil.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #98 from Len Brown len.br...@intel.com 2009-04-01 04:25:19 ---
MSI patch in comment #95 applied to acpi-test tree
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #94 from Black brot.kann.man.nicht.einfrie...@gmail.com
2009-03-27 10:10:55 ---
(In reply to comment #93)
there was a change from msleep(1) to udelay(...) in drivers/acpi/ec.c among
other things. If you could check that changing
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #95 from Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de 2009-03-27
14:15:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=20705)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20705)
separate MSI delays
Please check if this patch works for you.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #96 from Black brot.kann.man.nicht.einfrie...@gmail.com
2009-03-27 15:05:09 ---
(In reply to comment #95)
Created an attachment (id=20705)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20705) [details]
separate MSI delays
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #92 from Black brot.kann.man.nicht.einfrie...@gmail.com
2009-03-26 16:52:50 ---
Any updates on this?
2.6.29 is out but the problem still exists. What is the significant difference
between the patch from comment #81 and the final
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #93 from Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de 2009-03-26
17:51:56 ---
there was a change from msleep(1) to udelay(...) in drivers/acpi/ec.c among
other things. If you could check that changing it back helps you, it will be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
brot.kann.man.nicht.einfrie...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #89 from brot.kann.man.nicht.einfrie...@gmail.com 2009-01-08
04:44 ---
Sorry, I booted the wrong kernel. Forget all I said about the threshold.
Setting it to 20 makes no noticable difference.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Power-Battery |EC
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #86 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 09:17 ---
(In reply to comment #85)
patch in comment #81 applied to acpi-test.
test it now, or forever hold your peace.
Tested it. Works fine. Thank you very much :)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #85 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 11:36 ---
patch in comment #81 applied to acpi-test.
test it now, or forever hold your peace.
commit bfd14ac4bc840261f09d9dfd3b497c46131b1918
Author: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17620|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #82 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 22:46 ---
Hi, Alexey
From the attached patch it seems that spin lock is used in the EC driver.
Is it reasonable?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #83 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 22:52 ---
No, I added it just to have every cool thing in one place.
please read the code and stop asking stupid questions.
More so in bug reports.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #79 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 05:12 ---
vanilla please.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #80 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 09:32 ---
With the patch from comment #76 typing works as desired.
The number of interrupts increases by about 100 - 200 per second.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17571|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #74 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 23:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=17612)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17612action=view)
Patch 2/2: try the debug patch in which EC work mode is simplified
Hi,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #75 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-04 03:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=17616)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17616action=view)
Add some delay in EC GPE interrupt handler on some bios. (Patch 3)
Hi,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15336|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #77 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-04 07:19 ---
I applied the patches from comment #73, #74 and #75 to 2.6.27-rc5.
The system works well, i.e. typing is fine.
The number of interrupts however increases very fast, about
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #78 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-04 19:40 ---
Hi, Black
Thanks for the test and so quick response. It seems that the number of ACPI
interrupt is still increased very fast after the patches are applied. IMO this
is a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17586|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #67 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 01:48 ---
Tried that several months ago. Didn't work at all.
Regards,
Alex.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #66 from [EMAIL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #68 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 02:38 ---
Hi, Alexey
Do you mean the boot option of acpi_sci=edge?
If yes, it is different with what I said in the debug patch of comment #66.
If no, please tell me which
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #70 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 22:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=17586)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17586action=view)
try the debug patch in which the query_pending bit is cleared after
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #65 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 10:39 ---
(In reply to comment #64)
Black, are you able to test a new patch? It applies on top of 2.6.26 (or
2.6.26-rc6 if that's easier). It's attached to comment #9 on my bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #63 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-19 05:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=16887)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16887action=view)
kernel panic with pqtch 16868
5b664cb235e97afbf34db9c4d77f08ebd725335e +
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #62 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-17 12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=16868)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16868action=view)
same patch, attempt #3
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 07:52 ---
I tried 2.6.26-rc6 as well. For me it seems to work perfectly. No keystrokes
were lost while reading the battery.
The interrupt count was 6 all the time.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #60 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-16 15:44 ---
Just tried 2.6.26-rc6-00149-gc8988f9, same as before: ACPI keys work but are
something like 1 second behind.
OTOH, changing 5 to 20 for irq_count compare at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #59 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 11:55 ---
Any news/patch to test on this one?
This is clearly a regression from 2.6.25, i.e. ACPI keys lagging.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 12:00 ---
please try to change 5 to say 20 for irq_count compare at
drivers/acpi/ec.c:495.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 15:28 ---
Changed to 20, works perfectly now. Thanks a lot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-01 11:31 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-01 11:12 ---
I tried 2.6.25-git17. The
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-01 12:14 ---
(In reply to comment #52)
Please try to change udelay(...) to msleep(1) in drivers/acpi/ec.c:197.
That helps. Typing is fine again. :)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15350|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 00:50 ---
Guillaume,
Thanks for the log, it shows interrupts coming at much higher rate than needed,
so
you too suffer from interrupt storm this patch is trying to fix (apparently
to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||10279
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:04 ---
Now I'm a little confused.
I previously (i.e. comment #39, comment #41) reverted
acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm.patch, but since restore_poll_udelay.patch doesn't
make any sense
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:49 ---
Right. Sorry for confusion.
acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm caused several side effects, so it requires 2 more
patches with it, one of them big (add_poll_timer). It is too late to add
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=15349)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15349action=view)
dmesg of vanilla linux-git with 2c81ce4c9c37b910210f2640c28e98a0c398dc26
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=15350)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15350action=view)
dmesg of linux-git with the 3 patches
My dmesg buffer is too small for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-18 06:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=15328)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15328action=view)
Revert disable storm patch
Storm detection patch is not needed any longer.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15102|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-18 07:22 ---
does it change if you unload sbs*?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-18 07:10 ---
(In reply to comment #37)
Please check if this patch makes interrupt storm go away. It certainly helps
on my Acer.
On mine, it doesn't. Still losing keystrokes (might be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15327|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-18 18:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=15337)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15337action=view)
Add poll timer
Adding poll timer helps to get events from EC if GPE is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #35 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
Summary|SCI interrupt
65 matches
Mail list logo
