RE: [ActiveDir] NTDIS Size

2003-10-15 Thread John Reijnders
I agree with the fact that it won't buy you anything in terms of performance. However, splitting up into D/E/F does reduce the chance that journal wraps might occur. Journal wrap errors occur if a sufficient number of changes take place while FRS is turned off or busysuch that the last USN

RE: [ActiveDir] Lock-outs after only one attempt...

2003-10-15 Thread John Reijnders
Consider using the ADUC provided with W2003. A new Active Directory Users and Computers property page called Additional Account Info and the lockoutstatus.exe utility are great troubleshooting tools for diagnosing lockout problems. They've proven to be very helpfull over and over ... Cheers! John

RE: [ActiveDir] how to enable administrator of one domain to enable/disable the user account of another domain

2003-10-15 Thread roseta
Hi Colin What you said solved the problem of creating user but does not let me enable/disable a user. I do not know why because I checked the edit property too. But because these domains were in the same forest just putting this administrator in Enterprise admin group solved my

RE: [ActiveDir] Lock-outs after only one attempt...

2003-10-15 Thread Raymond McClinnis
One of these days Ill learn how to proof read for coherency J  I just read what I sent, doesnt make much sense. Windows 2K Domain, Majority of Clients is Windows 2K. Attempts is set =5,(for obvious reasons I dont want to say the exact #) Joe: I thought best practices were to have it

[ActiveDir] Username

2003-10-15 Thread George Arezina
Hi people, Can anyone tell me if there is a way to expand the number of characters I can use to create a username in W2K AD. Most people over in Serbia have long first names and last names. I ran into a problem when creating a username that was longer than 20 characters long. My example is as

RE: [ActiveDir] Username

2003-10-15 Thread Craig Cerino
How about ateodosijevic? If the A is a common enough name/initial that there are two in the company (or 3 or 4) I would then move toaMIDDLENAME INITIAL teodosijevic. If by chance they have the same first AND middle name I would go with aMIDDLEINITIAL teodosijevic1 then aMIDDLEINITIAL

RE: [ActiveDir] Username

2003-10-15 Thread George Arezina
Yes, Company rule does state that it must be first name followed by last name! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 14:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How about ateodosijevic? If the A is a common

RE: [ActiveDir] Username

2003-10-15 Thread Craig Cerino
Curious - - is it for email purposes? The reason I ask is if they company doesn't want ateodosijevic coming up in email - that's a simple change of the DISPLAY NAME in Exchange. Just trying to come up with alternatives as I am not aware of any 3rd party tool to breakdown the 20 character

[ActiveDir]

2003-10-15 Thread Jerry Johnson
Hi Folks, I have 2 w2k servers in my network that are responsible for all the FSMO roles,DNS,DHCP,etc. Have just promoted a server3k member server to DC status and would Like to temporarily give the 3k server all of the above responsibility while I decommission the 2k servers one at a

RE: [ActiveDir]

2003-10-15 Thread Mulnick, Al
Title: Message Can't think of any reason why you couldn't pull this off. I can think of a thousand different things that could go wrong. As a suggestion, have you considered modifying the users DNS server usage? Say with a script? DHCP settings? Not sure that it really must be done that

RE: [ActiveDir]

2003-10-15 Thread jack . eales
Jerry, here's what I'd suggest - I've never done it.so it's a fairly simplistic overview- butit'sbased on everything I've read here and in other lists. (oh -don't forget totest it first!!) Setup DNS on Win2K3 server and ensure that information is replicating / zones transfers etc

RE: [ActiveDir]

2003-10-15 Thread jack . eales
Title: Message Doyour clients use DHCP to get their addresses or are they static? If they're DHCP - then a script shouldn't be needed just amend the scope options and let the changes filter through if they're static - then it might be time to start looking at DHCP to make your life

RE: [ActiveDir]

2003-10-15 Thread John Reijnders
You mention the fact that all clients point to these 2 DNS/DC servers. If this means that all clients are configures with 2 DNS servers, than you can migrate the 2 DCs one at the time (after having transferred the FSMOs to the 3K box). Hope this works out for you! Cheers! John

[ActiveDir] OT: SUS on a W2K DC

2003-10-15 Thread Abbiss, Mark
Title: Message Can anyone tell me where i might find a good maillist for SUS problems. I want to know how to install it on a DC. My problem is that the built in acounts found on non DC servers "IUSR" and "IWAM" are not available on a DC (not having local users and groups) So how do I

RE: [ActiveDir] Infrastructure and GC

2003-10-15 Thread Tony Murray
John is quite right. Also, if you have a single domain forest (which you don't) it doesn't matter if you make the DC hosting the IM a GC. The IM is responsible for maintaining references from objects its own domain to objects in other domains. This allows, for example, a DC to display the

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SUS on a W2K DC

2003-10-15 Thread Mulnick, Al
Title: Message http://www.susserver.com/ -Original Message-From: Abbiss, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:01 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: SUS on a W2K DC Can anyone tell me where i might find a good maillist

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SUS on a W2K DC

2003-10-15 Thread Abbiss, Mark
Title: Message thanks.. i realise my problem is more with IIS (which uses the IUSR and IWAM accounts). MS recommends not to install IIS on a DC but I assume if you have to you can...but how do you get around the IUSR and IWAM accounts not existing locally problem ? I apologise for being

RE: [ActiveDir] Infrastructure and GC

2003-10-15 Thread Kingslan, Rick T.
Title: Message Shawn, You can do it temporarily. Some updates might not be made to references about objects in other domains such. It's not a good thing to do for a long period of time, but it's not a horrific issue, either. Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCTMicrosoft MVP - Active

RE: [ActiveDir] Infrastructure and GC

2003-10-15 Thread Shawn.Hayes
Title: Message Rick, Thanks for the input...I appreciate it. Shawn -Original Message-From: Kingslan, Rick T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:27 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Infrastructure and GC Shawn, You can

RE: [ActiveDir]

2003-10-15 Thread Jerry Johnson
That does appear to be another option and it crossed my mind, maybe Im just trying to make this a bigger problem than it really is. Thanks for the suggestion Jerry Scicom Data Services Minnetonka,Mn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SUS on a W2K DC

2003-10-15 Thread Kingslan, Rick T.
Title: Message Mark, Maybe I'm being obtuse, but what leads you to believe that they don't exist locally? Simply because there is no local SAM to create the account in? The domain has an Administrator account, which resides in Active Directory. Where would the IUSR and IWAM accounts reside

RE: [ActiveDir] Lock-outs after only one attempt...

2003-10-15 Thread deji Agba
"Best Practice" is not a constant, you know. Reality and feedbacks from the trenches sometimes conspire to alter "best practices" every now and then. Some auditors forget this salient truth. 5 is not practical, for various reasons, one of which is the "fast user switch" bug of WinXP. Anyways,

RE: [ActiveDir] Lock-outs after only one attempt...

2003-10-15 Thread deji Agba
I figured it would help to include this link: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=7AF2E69C-91F3-4E63-8629-B999ADDE0B9Edisplaylang=en HTH Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+Iwww.akomolafe.comwww.iyaburo.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were

[ActiveDir] Slow Active Directory Users and Computers Snap in

2003-10-15 Thread Richard Sumilang
I am running Windows 2000 Server with Active Directory and have a network of about 30 users. For some reason each time I try to load the Active Directory Users and Computers Snap in it takes about 3-5 minutes to load. Any reason? List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ

RE: [ActiveDir] Lock-outs after only one attempt...

2003-10-15 Thread Raymond McClinnis
Thank you Dèjì, My comment was meant more tongue and cheek than anything else, an I was afraid it would come off wrong since I wrote it at 3AM Im going to start working with those tools now.  Again thanks for the pointer in the right direction Thanks, Raymond From:

RE: [ActiveDir] Slow Active Directory Users and Computers Snap in

2003-10-15 Thread Craig Cerino
What's the machine look like Richard? Processor - RAM - PentIII or IV ? Disk Space etc This is the first place I would start ( at the very beginning -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sumilang Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:00

RE: [ActiveDir] Slow Active Directory Users and Computers Snap in

2003-10-15 Thread Michael B. Smith
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8threadm=eZaT ZiOhCHA.2460%40tkmsftngp09rnum=2prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dmmc%2Baduc%2Bslow%2 6hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3DeZaTZiOhCHA.2460%254 0tkmsftngp09%26rnum%3D2 Has some advice that might be worthwhile to look at.

RE: [ActiveDir] Slow Active Directory Users and Computers Snap in

2003-10-15 Thread Mulnick, Al
Probably move from that if it checks out well to name resolution. While on the desktop, have a look in the event logs for anything wrong there as well as the DC logs to see what's being recorded if anything. Al -Original Message- From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

[ActiveDir] OT: Reporting on TS Cals

2003-10-15 Thread Creamer, Mark
Has anyone seen a way to dump or report on the issued licenses that are displayed in the Terminal Services Licensing MMC? Maybe a script or a TechNet tool Im not aware of? Thanks, Mark Creamer Systems Engineer Cintas Corporation http://www.cintas.com Honesty and Integrity in

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Reporting on TS Cals

2003-10-15 Thread Michael B. Smith
C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Toolslsreport /? Write information about licenses granted by Terminal Server License Servers. lsreport [/F filename] [/D start [end]] [/T] [/W] [/?] [serverlist] /F filename Directs output to be written to a file named filename. (filename

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Reporting on TS Cals

2003-10-15 Thread Creamer, Mark
Sheesh, not sure how I missed that one. Thanks Michael! mc -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Reporting on TS Cals C:\Program Files\Windows

[ActiveDir] OT: FTP Problem

2003-10-15 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
FTP: Resp. to Port 3607, '426 Connection closed; Transfer Aborted.' My Web designer keeps having a hard time uploading files to my FTP server with the above message, any ideas? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 212.752.7300 - office 917.455.0110 - cell

RE: [ActiveDir] Slow Active Directory Users and Computers Snap in

2003-10-15 Thread deji
Check your DNS configuration. Make sure you are not pointing DNS to anything but your internal DNS servers. HTH Sincerely, Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I www.akomolafe.com www.iyaburo.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: FTP Problem

2003-10-15 Thread Creamer, Mark
Using what kind of ftp client? mc -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:52 PM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: FTP Problem FTP: Resp. to Port 3607, '426 Connection closed; Transfer Aborted.' My Web

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: FTP Problem

2003-10-15 Thread Creamer, Mark
Tried toggling between active and passive modes to see if one works? Might also have to do with your connection equipment (i.e. dsl router or whatever) see this http://www.pctechforums.com/modules.php?name=FTP mc -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: FTP Problem

2003-10-15 Thread Rick Reynolds
any firewalls in between?? are you allowing access to this server if behind the firewall, either one-one-nat, or otherwise. - Original Message - From: Salandra, Justin A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: FTP

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SUS on a W2K DC

2003-10-15 Thread Free, Bob
Can anyone tell me where i might find a good maillist for SUS problems Not a mail list but microsoft.public.softwareupdatesvcs has lots of expertise and MS-SUS folks actively participating From: Abbiss, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October

[ActiveDir] Intrasite Replication Schedule

2003-10-15 Thread FDiskThePC
As most of you know, the default intrasite replication schedule in Windows 2000 is 5 minutes yet 15 seconds in Windows Server 2003. Has anyone changed the setting in a Windows 2000 domain (Q214678) to match the settings that are now the default in Windows Server 2003? The five minute replication