Hi
I have set up a policy for one OU where I have stopped the downloads can be
saved on to the local location.
But, still they can click 'open' and run the installation.
Which policy am I missing here?
Thanks
Md ILyas
Conares Metal Supply Ltd
p.o.box 2854,
Whenwe had a similar project, the intention was not so much to prevent "the user" from accessing network resources. IThe objective was to turn off unpatched/vulnerable systems that do not conform to the corporate standard. For example, you want computers that don't have the latest AV or are not
Yep, I understand. The problem is I need
the logon script to run to get any of that accomplished.
Meanwhile, Ive been reading up on
some of the new network admission control stuff Ciscos been working on.
Sounds like a great concept.
mc
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba
Thank you all guys for your help.
I've mode some investigation on this. Here are the results. Correct me if I'am
mistaken.
When AD object is deleted it is actually moved to the Deleted Objects container of the
partition it is deleted from.
But when it is moved to that container only a little
The only other way I can think of to track object deletion is to use auditing. Of
course this involves somehow collating the event log information, but there are tools
available to do this.
Tony
-- Original Message --
Wrom: ULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKY
There's a good description of the different strategies you can use to track
AD changes at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/ad/ad/track
ing_changes.asp?frame=true.
Tony, you should add this to the FAQ... It seems to come up every few
months.
-gil
-Original
We have some servers with slow connections due to some political site link
connections times. What I believe is happening is that the replication window is not
sufficient to propagate all the changes, and when the changes reach to the box, the
files it's expecting to change are no longer
I noticed that there is a WMI core install for Win9x and I installed it on my test
Win95 machine.
However, I can't get the WMI script to reboot that machine. Is it possible that even
though WMI core
is installed, it doesn't give me access to all of the features I'd have on a Win2K
machine?
The
You can try the following shell command:
RunDll32.exe Shell32.dll,SHExitWindowsEx 0x1
http://www.borncity.com/WSHBazaar/WSHExitWin3.htm for details.
Guy
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 21:41, Creamer, Mark wrote:
I noticed that there is a WMI core install for Win9x and I installed it on my test
Win95
Hey Darren have you ever seen that attribute populated? I don't recall ever
seeing it on any objects. I never looked deeply into it though to see what
it was legally linked to.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Weve been looking into that stuff,
too. You looking at the Cisco agent
stuff or the 802.1x stuff?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Creamer, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004
10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] forcing a
FYI, lastKnownParent is not supported on W2K.
Robbie Allen
http://www.rallenhome.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How to
Title: Upgrade to Win2k
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/deploy/cookbook/cookintr.asp
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+Iwww.akomolafe.comwww.iyaburo.comDo you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: Sudhir
i dunno how but your emails keep commin 2 my in box like 40 or 550 a day
pls help
- Original Message -
From: Byron Fackenthall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 7:48 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] forcing a logoff
If you have WMI installed on your
14 matches
Mail list logo
