Title: Message
What sort of extension is the file that the user is trying to
receive?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:58
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
Outlook 2003 attachment
Manjeet,
Is the problem definitely at the Outlook
level? The below registry entry would allow exe's and mdb's through.
Are you running a content control tool or similar on your Exchange box? Are the
customers "E-Mail Solutions" deleting the attachment?
Windows Registry Editor Version
We want to alow file name with extension $$$"Caple, Andrew" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What sort of extension is the file that the user is trying to receive?
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ManjeetSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:58 PMTo:
Hi James,
Yes the problem is with outlook level, Because the user having outlook 2000 are able to send the files without any problem. The problem starts coming only after upgradation of some outlook clients from 2000 to outlook 2003.
Please not that I want to allow only file with $$$ extension.
you might appreciate this little Outlook Attachment Options
tool:
http://www.pcworld.co.nz/PCWorld/fileworld.nsf/0/1FEB65E47ADDAF37CC256DFE0078B067?OpenDocument
/Guido
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ManjeetSent: Montag, 28. Juni 2004 06:59To:
[EMAIL
We have
about a years experience with SL, managing about 6000 users in one
domain, and 1000 in another. I find it to be an extremely useful product. The
point of SL isnt that it does anything you cant easily do with
other scripting languages (e.g. vbscript or Perl) if you know what youre
I will assume you are using exchange. Have you
installed the Outlook Security Form in the Exchange Public folder tree and set
the CheckAdminSettings reg key
(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Security\CheckAdminSettings:0x1)?
If this is the case, then you need to allow the $$$
hello,
I do not think that has any problem because it will give me an IP which is an invalid
one the correct gateway and DNS.
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.11
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.148.0.9
DNS Servers . . .
just wanted to add that I have installed DNS which is on AD on this DC and it works
perferctly!!!
hello,
I do not think that has any problem because it will give me an IP which is an
invalid one the correct gateway and DNS.
IP Address. . . . . . . . . .
check the eventlogs. Normally you should get many failures of RPC in such
a case. What does the eventlog show?
Is the RPC service up and running on your machine?
just wanted to add that I have installed DNS which is on AD on this DC and
it works perferctly!!!
hello,
I do not think that
I have a quick question. In Windows 2000. If AD-Integrated storage is used
for DNS zone data. Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info?
I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain
that had AD-Integrated DNS. When it came to looking at the data
Title: Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native
Hi All,
Coming from a domino background.
I'm about to move a domain here to native mode. I've performed it before a few time but not with Exchange2000 in the equation. Is their any effect?
BR
Rob
This e-mail and the
Title: Message
there
even.
-Original Message-From: Rutherford,
Robert Sent: 28 June 2004 15:55To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Effects on
Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native
Hi All,
Coming from a domino background.
I'm about to move a domain here to
Title: Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Native
On Exchange? Exchange likes native mode. In fact, if
you'd been following the recommendations, you'd have put Exchange in a native
mode domain already to allow for USG's. Doesn't seem to affect you, but
it's one comforting factor :)
Title: Message
Ahh
very...
Cheers
-Original Message-From: Mulnick, Al
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 June 2004
16:05To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Effects on Exchange on the move from Mixed to Nat
ive
On Exchange? Exchange likes native mode. In
Well I have used NetIQ Security
Administration Suite. Im not sure of the pricing but I can recommend the
product. It works really well in an AD environment covering all sorts of functionality
such as distributed, delegated administration, enforcement of corporate
standards etc. Offers a
It has been a while so I am asking for a little refresh.
What is the different between an IP Inter-Site Transports and a SMTP
Inter-Site Transports? When would you use the SMTP one?
Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
Senior Network Engineer
Catholic Healthcare System
212.752.7300 - office
917.455.0110 -
Dear friends,
Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ?
Thanks,
Elton Pimentel.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
The IP transports use RPC.
The SMTP transport can only be used if the two DCs that use it are in
different domains AND different sites.
See:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/technologie
s/activedirectory/deploy/confeat/ntopt11.mspx
-Original Message-
From:
Todd
I don't think the delay would be an LDAP referral (although I've been known to be
wrong before!). The GC contains all the DNS zone objects and DNS node objects in the
forest.
The GC doesn't show the more interesting attributes. Neither dnsProperty (for dnsZone
objects) nor dnsRecord
There are many but the main tools I use are. There are also many 3rd party support
tools available on the internet.
Replmon.exe (Res Kit)
Dcdiag.exe (Support Tools)
netdiag.exe (Support Tools)
Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
You would use SMTP if you had an unreliable connection or a slow connection where RPC
traffic would drop. Also, if replication wasn't required to be timely.
RPC traffic is highly effected by latency. SMTP replication would work better on
slower or unstable link since SMTP doesn't care about
AD
Tools
-Original Message-
From: Elton Gouvêa Pimentel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Dear friends,
Does anyone knows any tools to diagnose problems on AD ?
Thanks,
Ok. I know the ones you have listed. However what I really want is a tool that will
analyse my entire AD and will point out any errors. I am having problems to promote
Windows 2003 servers on my Windows 2000 farm. I have already looked at the adprep logs
and they have no error messages. As a
Title: Mensagem
I have
already tried this one. It does not run on my Windows 2003 DC. It keeps
reporting erros on the .vbs file.
Thanks
anyway.
Elton
Pimentel.
-Mensagem original-De:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em nome de Ellis, DebbieEnviada em:
Return Receipt
Your RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
document
:
I think you're looking for Microsoft Consulting Services.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elton Gouvêa
Pimentel
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RES: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Ok. I know the ones you
There is also:
repadmin.exe (Resource Kit)
adsiedit.exe (Support Tools)
nltest.exe (Resource Kit)
ldp.exe (Support Tools)
gpresult.exe (Resource Kit)
ntdsutil.exe (an absolute must if you're going to work with the NTDS.DIT file)
Another recommendation is Full Armor's 'GPO Repository'. This is
Thanks for the second set of eyes.
I have an Exchange guy that is trying to argue against the inclusion of AD
Integrated DNS zones, because in his POV the number of changes to DNS
records would incur would cause the GC's replicate like crazy.
I haven't heard anyone really complain to loudly
Man after reading my response, I am starting to thing I regressed in my
ability to communicate clearly.
I apologize for all the bad grammar.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS
You don't need to have the SMTP protocol installed through IIS on those
domain controllers replicating data on these links do you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chianese, David
P.
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hy,
Any have
idea or it happened ? resolveNTFS USN journal truncated ? The Server is Windows 2000 SP4.
Thanks.
Event Type:ErrorEvent
Source:NtFrsEvent
Category:NoneUser:N/AComputer:SERVERNAMEDescription:The File
Replication Service has detected that the replica set "DOMAIN SYSTEM VOLUME
FRS
determines what it needs to replicate based on the NTFS journal. If FRS is
offline for a period of time, it's possible that the NTFS journal has wrapped
(been overwritten by newer stuff). If the journal has overwritten itself
while FRS is offline, it won't know of any changes in the
You should look at netpro's directory troubleshooter. I am surprised Gil
hasn't already been on this thread ; )
From: Elton Gouvêa Pimentel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:24:48 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD diagnostic tools
Easy to fix this. Tell your Exchange guy to show you the Matrix he's looking
at to draw his replicate like crazy conclusion. Then tell him that AD-intg
can easily be reversed IF crazy things start happening.
From where I'm standing, AD-intg does not induce crazy behaviors. Oftentime,
when you
You most likely want to perform a non-authoritative restore of FRS on the DC
that's in journal wrap. This shouldn't be confused with a non-authoritative
restore of DS.
Basically, you set the Burflags value to D2 on the DC in journal wrap. The
DC will then pull in (from a replication partner)
Title: Message
I did this recently in a lab environment.
DNS is left dirty after the process. Sort of a good/bad thing. Both names can
be resolved to the same IP (old/new). Some cleanup will be in order
eventually. Definitely suggest testing in a lab first.
-Al
-Original
And at the risk of shameless self-promotion, there's Quest's Spotlight on Active
Directory...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Westmoreland
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD
38 matches
Mail list logo
