Title: [ActiveDir] Cleaning up Stale entries in AD
No I am not talking about records in DNS
(in that case, the scavenging option in DNS will handle that). What I am
talking about specifically is automatically deleting computer and user accounts
from active directly if they have not been
I am seeing more duplicate PTR records in our DNS reverse zones than I'd
like. Our DHCP lease is 8 days, the zones are AD integrated. I've been
down the DNSUpdateProxy group road, etc. So I believe the records are
duplicates because they are not scavenged in time, not because of
security rights
Title: [ActiveDir] Cleaning up Stale entries in AD
Well, then OLDCMP can help you
detect "old" accounts. OLDCMP is from Joeware (http://www.joeware.net/win/free/tools/oldcmp.htm)
For computer accounts you could
use something similar as mentioned below or just fire up OLDCMP each 2 months or
Take a look at an article written by Marcus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa,
Johnny
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:35
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging
I am seeing more
Take a look at an article written by Marcus
http://myitforum.techtarget.com/articles/16/print_view.asp?id=6287
Cheers,
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa,
Johnny
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:35
To:
thanks but i'm more interested in client perms not inheriting.
not admin perms.
if a user takes someone out of a PF in outlook, i'd like to propagate downward or be given the choice like ntfs...
thanks
On 9/30/05, Katherine Coombs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tom,For question number two check out
Hello Bagus..
I believe Lotus Notes requires the user to have Modfiy rights to the
Notes\Data directory. You can assign this with a GPO, if you wish.
The sharing, I'm wondering if you have simple file sharing turned on? It's
in explorer, tools, folder options, view, uncheck the box that says
From AD's perspective, the RDN is Some User (or cn=Some User). It
does not include anything beyond that, such as OU or container paths.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Chopp
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:54 PM
To:
If you have a folder and subfolders that need to maintain
the same set of permissions, grant the permissions to a group at the top foler
and propagate them down; then manage the group membership to grant/revoke
permissions.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Coleman, Hunter wrote:
From AD's perspective, the RDN is Some User (or cn=Some User). It
does not include anything beyond that, such as OU or container paths.
OK, I think that clears it up for me. From the Novell eDirectory point of
view, given that you can have a context handle set to any
Thanks, Joe.
We've refined what is happening by network tracing. For the record the
behaviour at a client can be 'random' with success or failure to change the
password observed on the same client machine on different occasions. The
behaviour varies in that the client may initially use DNS to
Off Topic: Does anyone know if there is a MOM 2005 mailing
list out there?
Devon Harding
Windows Systems Engineer
Southern Wine Spirits
- BSG
954-602-2469
__This message and any attachments are solely
http://www.listleague.com/
Go to "View Hosted Lists by Interest", then Microsoft
Management, then MOM
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding,
DevonSent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:46 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] OT: Microsoft
Looks like a problem with the GigE adapter (both the Dell and the Super
Micros are Intel Pro1000 based) and the switch not getting negotiating
properly before the network starts up. It looks like mediasense is
causing a problem.
I found
Our
AD is an empty forest root domain with several one-offdomains. Some
domainsincluding the root are Win2003so we've AD-integrated their
respective DNS zones and set the replication scope to All DNS servers in the AD
forest.
For
one DC in one domain though, the root zone comes up with
Thank you, great article
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:42 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging
Take a look at an article
Hey Steve,
Thanks dear but please help me out and tell me the scope of success when using this utility. is this reliable? what about administration, is it easy or will become hard?
is it possible that i can shadow any user in organization?
Thanks again!
On 9/29/05, Steve Linehan [EMAIL
As far as success there are many
enterprise customers leveraging this utility and it went through several rounds
of beta testing before being released. It was written to replace the resource kit
utility cconect.exe as a more reliable and scalable tool. As far as
administration the tool has
18 matches
Mail list logo