RE: [ActiveDir] Cleaning up Stale entries in AD

2005-09-30 Thread Oluwaseyi Owoeye
Title: [ActiveDir] Cleaning up Stale entries in AD No I am not talking about records in DNS (in that case, the scavenging option in DNS will handle that). What I am talking about specifically is automatically deleting computer and user accounts from active directly if they have not been

[ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging

2005-09-30 Thread Figueroa, Johnny
I am seeing more duplicate PTR records in our DNS reverse zones than I'd like. Our DHCP lease is 8 days, the zones are AD integrated. I've been down the DNSUpdateProxy group road, etc. So I believe the records are duplicates because they are not scavenged in time, not because of security rights

RE: [ActiveDir] Cleaning up Stale entries in AD

2005-09-30 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Title: [ActiveDir] Cleaning up Stale entries in AD Well, then OLDCMP can help you detect "old" accounts. OLDCMP is from Joeware (http://www.joeware.net/win/free/tools/oldcmp.htm) For computer accounts you could use something similar as mentioned below or just fire up OLDCMP each 2 months or

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging

2005-09-30 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Take a look at an article written by Marcus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa, Johnny Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:35 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging I am seeing more

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging

2005-09-30 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Take a look at an article written by Marcus http://myitforum.techtarget.com/articles/16/print_view.asp?id=6287 Cheers, Jorge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Figueroa, Johnny Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:35 To:

Re: [ActiveDir] 2 exchange public folder questions

2005-09-30 Thread Tom Kern
thanks but i'm more interested in client perms not inheriting. not admin perms. if a user takes someone out of a PF in outlook, i'd like to propagate downward or be given the choice like ntfs... thanks On 9/30/05, Katherine Coombs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tom,For question number two check out

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-09-30 Thread jpsalemi
Hello Bagus.. I believe Lotus Notes requires the user to have Modfiy rights to the Notes\Data directory. You can assign this with a GPO, if you wish. The sharing, I'm wondering if you have simple file sharing turned on? It's in explorer, tools, folder options, view, uncheck the box that says

RE: [ActiveDir] Maximum distinguished name length?

2005-09-30 Thread Coleman, Hunter
From AD's perspective, the RDN is Some User (or cn=Some User). It does not include anything beyond that, such as OU or container paths. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Chopp Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:54 PM To:

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 exchange public folder questions

2005-09-30 Thread Coleman, Hunter
If you have a folder and subfolders that need to maintain the same set of permissions, grant the permissions to a group at the top foler and propagate them down; then manage the group membership to grant/revoke permissions. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [ActiveDir] Maximum distinguished name length?

2005-09-30 Thread Chuck Chopp
Coleman, Hunter wrote: From AD's perspective, the RDN is Some User (or cn=Some User). It does not include anything beyond that, such as OU or container paths. OK, I think that clears it up for me. From the Novell eDirectory point of view, given that you can have a context handle set to any

RE: [ActiveDir] use of IP ports during change password

2005-09-30 Thread Roger Mackenzie
Thanks, Joe. We've refined what is happening by network tracing. For the record the behaviour at a client can be 'random' with success or failure to change the password observed on the same client machine on different occasions. The behaviour varies in that the client may initially use DNS to

[ActiveDir] OT: Microsoft MOM Mailing list?

2005-09-30 Thread Harding, Devon
Off Topic: Does anyone know if there is a MOM 2005 mailing list out there? Devon Harding Windows Systems Engineer Southern Wine Spirits - BSG 954-602-2469 __This message and any attachments are solely

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Microsoft MOM Mailing list?

2005-09-30 Thread Coleman, Hunter
http://www.listleague.com/ Go to "View Hosted Lists by Interest", then Microsoft Management, then MOM From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, DevonSent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:46 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] OT: Microsoft

Re: [ActiveDir] Group Policy processing aborted

2005-09-30 Thread Al Lilianstrom
Looks like a problem with the GigE adapter (both the Dell and the Super Micros are Intel Pro1000 based) and the switch not getting negotiating properly before the network starts up. It looks like mediasense is causing a problem. I found

[ActiveDir] Integrated DNS zones

2005-09-30 Thread Becker, Jim
Our AD is an empty forest root domain with several one-offdomains. Some domainsincluding the root are Win2003so we've AD-integrated their respective DNS zones and set the replication scope to All DNS servers in the AD forest. For one DC in one domain though, the root zone comes up with

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging

2005-09-30 Thread Figueroa, Johnny
Thank you, great article -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:42 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Aging and Scavenging Take a look at an article

Re: [ActiveDir] user log on to only one workstation at a time

2005-09-30 Thread Ravi Dogra
Hey Steve, Thanks dear but please help me out and tell me the scope of success when using this utility. is this reliable? what about administration, is it easy or will become hard? is it possible that i can shadow any user in organization? Thanks again! On 9/29/05, Steve Linehan [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] user log on to only one workstation at a time

2005-09-30 Thread Steve Linehan
As far as success there are many enterprise customers leveraging this utility and it went through several rounds of beta testing before being released. It was written to replace the resource kit utility cconect.exe as a more reliable and scalable tool. As far as administration the tool has