RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread neil.ruston
 I hope to attend altho have yet to confirm. [For those in the UK/EU - check out Virgin airline prices. Return flights to Vegas are very cheap right now!] neil From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark ParrisSent: 05 January 2006 22:17To:

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Tomasz Onyszko
joe wrote: Yeah they were nice bags, they just didn't seem to fit my old Dell laptop if I recall. Definitely won't fit my new HP DV8000Z (www.hpshopping.com http://www.hpshopping.com). I think though if I haul that around too much I will need back surgery anyway so it is probably a good

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Actually I was thinking about that a couple times – just yesterday I was sitting there on the bar after working out, reading a computer magazine and making notes of interesting URLs. Would be much more comfortable to take the laptop to the gym. However unfortunately they don’t have WLAN there

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
I’ve got my body tuned so it knows it’s not expecting much sleep in the conference weeks. I even took the morning shifts in the Ask-the-Expert Area to make sure that I have to get up and will not miss more of the conference than necessary. And we were always the last one leaving the public

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
damn I knew there was a catch! ;-)) jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick Sent: Fri 2006-01-06 00:48 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 Jorge, you're speaking at DEC. You already get a free pass.

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
it looks like it should be a swiss army bag with a rolling 6 pack cooler that you can take to the gym and is not a burden when drinking at the bar... ehhh I mean doing some quality community interaction ;-) is that possible Gil? J. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread neil.ruston
 ... with a swiss army knife and maglite torch thrown in for free :) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge deSent: 06 January 2006 10:15To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 it looks like it

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Tomasz Onyszko
Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote: it looks like it should be a swiss army bag with a rolling 6 pack cooler that you can take to the gym and is not a burden when drinking at the bar... ehhh I mean doing some quality community interaction ;-) is that possible Gil? You forgot about portable

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Parris
Yepp out on the Friday back on Wednesday £260 all in, that's direct too. Last year the Vancouver TZ was a killer for me hence leaving London on the Friday so I can get my head down before the start. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:57:08

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread neil.ruston
Yep, was thinking along those lines so I could sample the entertainment and nightlife, sorry I mean 'recover from jetlag', before the conf starts :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: 06 January 2006 10:34 To:

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Laura E. Hunter
On 1/6/06, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hope that Vegas is a more fun place – in Orlando they were shutting everything down at 1am, in Barcelona at least the Hilton did the same. Las Vegas (at least on the main strip) is a 24x7 town - the casinos intentionally crank down the

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread James_Day
I am going - the last two have been fantastic. Regards; James R. Day Active Directory Core Team Office of the Chief Information Officer National Park Service 202-230-2983 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |-+-- | | Gil Kirkpatrick | | |

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Todd Hofert
I have one user account and one mailbox. In AD you do have to add these additional e-mail addresses to that single user account on the e-mail address tab of the user properties. The e-mail addresses are legitimate not spoofed. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
While in LV a couple of months ago, I had the opportunity to visit the absolutely spectacular Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area (http://www.desertusa.com/redrock/). It's about 20 miles NW of LV. If you're looking for a diversion, this is a great one! And keep an eye open for the

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Al Mulnick
And when it arrives at its destination these 'secondary' addresses are showing as the sender in that configuration? On 1/6/06, Todd Hofert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have one user account and one mailbox. In AD you do have to add these additional e-mail addresses to that single user account on

Re: [ActiveDir] Way OT: DC Server monitoring tools

2006-01-06 Thread Al Mulnick
Hmm.. Plenty of good ideas, but I have to admit if you find MOM difficult and don't want to spend the time, most of the solutions talked about will have similar issues. I admit MOM interface is terrible for what you sound like you want to do. Then again, can it be simpler (the answer's yes, but

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Todd Hofert
correct. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 8:27 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As And when it arrives at its destination these 'secondary' addresses are showing as the

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Parris
Yes -Original Message- From: Al Mulnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:26:59 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As And when it arrives at its destination these 'secondary' addresses are showing as the sender in that configuration?

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread joe
 On the strip the only way to know the time is to look at your watch or the sun. I hear they are trying to outlaw both. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B. Simon-WeidnerSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:00 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:

[ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Douglas M. Long
Title: Way OT: DC Server monitoring tools Man, can someone tell me what I am doing wrong here. I just cannot figure this out. Dont laugh; I am sure it is something stupid. adfind -default -rb ou=wsusclients,ou=xpclients -f (objectcategory=computer) I assume this should search for

RE: [ActiveDir] Way OT: DC Server monitoring tools

2006-01-06 Thread Peter Johnson
I certainly have found the AM interface a lot less overwhelming and pleasant to work with as opposed to MOM although MOM 2005 SP1 is a vast improvement. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick Sent: 06 January 2006 15:34 To:

RE: [ActiveDir] Way OT: DC Server monitoring tools

2006-01-06 Thread Rich Milburn
Al makes a good point Enterprise Management is not typically an open-the-box, fire-and-forget solution. In fact I havent seen a single product out there that comes close at least not one that I havent been terribly disappointed with. WUG (Whats Up Gold) used to be pretty close (talking 6

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
are you sure the OUs are correct? it works for me when I try it... (see below) Jorge D:\TOOLSadfind -default -rb ou=computers,ou=org -f (objectcategory=computer) AdFind V01.28.00cpp Joe Richards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) December 2005 Using server: rootdc001.ADCORP.LAN:389 Directory: Windows Server

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread joe
Title: Way OT: DC & Server monitoring tools What does the part at the bottom say... the part that says Best Match of: That will tell you how much of the DN it knows to be valid. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. LongSent: Friday, January 06, 2006

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread joe
Only the primary SMTP should be listed as who it is from... Secondaries should just be used for receipt last time I checked in E2K3... Even for replies. in fact the account this is coming from has SMTP proxyaddresses of proxyAddresses: smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]proxyAddresses: smtp:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread joe
For some odd reason, many (but not all) of Mark's messages come through my outlook (POP3/SMTP from Exchange) blank. But if I look at the message in OWA it looks fine. Very odd. It would be a nice feature if it can be controlled. ;o) -- There are no bugs, only features that have yet to be

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Al Mulnick
That's what interests me, because E2K3 is *known* to change the from to the primary address when it passes through the SMTP stack. The configuration described intrigues me because of that. Might have to setup a 2K3 server to find out what's changed. On 1/6/06, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Douglas M. Long
Yeah, I just checked again to make sure, and the OUs are correct _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:15 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax are you sure

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Douglas M. Long
Title: Way OT: DC Server monitoring tools It tells me DC=domain,DC=com Of course with the correct domain for domain though. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:31 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE:

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
is the OU structure you mention below setup from the left or from the right? if it is from the left, it should be from the right (lower level -top level), then it should be: OU=xpclients,OU=wsusclients if you structure is: OU=xpclients,OU=wsusclients corresponds to: DOMAIN.COM

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Laura E. Hunter
This may sound whacky, but did you type the command in manually, or did you copy/paste all or part from here or the joeware site? I've had adfind/admod get cranky on me when I do a copy/paste, but then work perfectly when I type in the exact same thing manually. Just a thought. - Laura On

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Parris
I have two mailboxes - hence two primaries_ -Original Message- From: Al Mulnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:02:54 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As That's what interests me, because E2K3 is *known* to change the from to the

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Al Mulnick
That would be a different expectation though. If you have two mailboxes, and you have send as rights for both, then you would be able to well, send as that address. You have that right. However, if you authenticate as user1 and user1 has a primary address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a secondary

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Douglas M. Long
Oh lord, I feel like a total shmuck. That is exactly what my problem was. I don't know how many times I looked at that command and didn't notice it. You would almost think I have never seen LDAP format. Ha Thanks _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

2006-01-06 Thread Becker, Jim
Title: Way OT: DC & Server monitoring tools .forgiven you're- eventually it do all we ,OK That's From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. LongSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:18 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: adfind syntax

[ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Pohlschneider, Chris
Title: OT: Patch Management Does anyone have recommendations for patch management software that could be installed on a desktop type system to manage a network with 120 nodes for updates and patches. I was looking at WSUS, but the requirements are that you need a server OS, plus the minimum

[ActiveDir] Deploy ActiveX Control

2006-01-06 Thread John Tomawski
What is the best practice for deployingActiveX controlsfor Internet Explorer through active directory? I need to install or allow the installation of multiple ActiveX controls for use with a specific vendors website. Currently ActiveX controls are disabled through group policy. If more details

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Za Vue
Title: OT: Patch Management Pretty much all patch management applications require a server. -Z.V. Pohlschneider, Chris wrote: Does anyone have recommendations for patch management software that could be installed on a desktop type system to manage a network with 120 nodes for

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Shavlik runs from my Desktop. Za Vue wrote: Pretty much all patch management applications require a server. -Z.V. Pohlschneider, Chris wrote: Does anyone have recommendations for patch management software that could be installed on a desktop type system to manage a network with 120 nodes

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Uh... we run WSUS on a SBS box...the specs/mins aren't that outrageous for us. Za Vue wrote: Pretty much all patch management applications require a server. -Z.V. Pohlschneider, Chris wrote: Does anyone have recommendations for patch management software that could be installed on a

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Za Vue
We tested on wkstations and servers and decided it was not worth the hefty price. My opinion is that it is too slow, tested on a duel CPU P4 system. (Personally I think the GUI is ugly) We ran into firewall issues as well. I have a dedicated W23K server for WSUS, no problem. Microsoft

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Title: OT: Patch Management The specs requirements listed seem to be overkill to me. Also, you can work around that by approving the updates in groups, or applying them to computers in phases. The integration with GPO and the fact you can set it up and roll the whole thing out from your

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
I'll get right on that... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Onyszko Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:22 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote: it looks like it

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Oh.. let's see.. patches Adobe and Flash and many of the other third party stuff I have in my office. Not to mention [I think] easier interface that WSUS as it only shows patches you need and lists them with the year-patch number that I know not the KB number I don't. Besides.. as a SBSer

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sorry one other thing.. when I want to have instant gratification and control... I patch ..right then and force a reboot of all workstations/servers, etc. There's no waiting for them to check in, or scripting a faster checkin [horrors] to get a faster patch deployment. Also it had SBS

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Rocky Habeeb
So ... You reboot on the fly ... And I'm sure everybody is fine with that ... And everything is tested ... And you can promise all your users that none of their 700 apps are going to crash ... Just asking, because if that's the promise of Shavlik, then I'll stop working on trying to get my WSUS

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
After I test on a test network at home, after I apply them to my 'canary boxes' and check and make sure everything is fine, after I watch the chatter on the patchmangement.org listserve and google on the newsgroups for the KB article number to see if everything looks good and check my own SBS

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Rocky Habeeb
Curses! I don't want to do all that!!! ;-) I'm a gui guy, because I don't have the scripting skills yet. So are you saying Shavlik is more (and/or easier) gui than WSUS? And I'm not into annoyance either so what are the big annoyances here in WSUS versus Shavlik? Seriously. I'm trying to learn

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
E-Bitz - SBS MVP the Official Blog of the SBS Diva : Patching Webcast for your viewing pleasure: http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2005/12/22/79673.aspx At the end of this SBS usergroup webcast is a demo of WSUS and then a demo of Shavlik. Click, deploy patches now, reboot. Rescan.

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Patch Management

2006-01-06 Thread Noah Eiger
Susan: I have been looking on several my machines for the kitchen sink service (ksinksvc.exe?) I don't see it. Is this needed for deploying dish-washing apps? ;-) -- nme -Original Message- From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,

Re: [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 Server

2006-01-06 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
I guess you will have to try the process explorer from www.sysinternals.com In that you can search for handle of the file, and corresponding process which is holding that handle. Try not to give full name of pdf, just give initial few letters. I have been to able to kill even the most critical

RE: [ActiveDir] User Password Expiration

2006-01-06 Thread Lee, Wook
How about using some kind of one-time passcode associated with a PKI-based login? If some central authority held the passcode generator and only handed out the passcodes on request, that might get you to the behavior youre looking for. Still, its not trivial to set up something like that.

[ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Tom Kern
Is there any quick easy way to get the size of all your Exchange 2k mailbox/public stores in your Org? Thanks

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread deji
Try get mailbox size and exchange in google. Sincerely, Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCT Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.readymaids.com - we know IT www.akomolafe.com Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Joe Pochedley
Windows Explorer? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 2:29 PMTo: activedirectorySubject: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size Is there any quick easy way to get the size of all your Exchange 2k mailbox/public stores in your

Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Tom Kern
I checked Google and all I get are links to check the size of one mailbox. I'm trying to avoid explorer. I have a lot of exchange servers and i'd just like to get the size of each store in each storage group on each server. Explorer would kill me and ESM only gives you per mailbox size. I'm

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Carerros, Charles
Two suggestions: 1) Open EMS, navigate to the Mailbox Store under your store name. Export the list, import to Excel and add the size column (This will also allow you to easily find out who is using too much space. 2) Navigate your Exchange server and find the folder that you have your

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Check the application event logs on the exchange servers for ESE 220. Text of those should show the size of each store as the backup of the store begins. Given a list of your Exchange servers, you could script that up to check them all and dump out the results to a file. From: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Lee, Wook
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 Im doing my regular lounge act at DEC. I dont know if Ill be able to make it to DEC 07 if I have to pay to play (the DEC that will live in Infamy if they make us pay, haha). Maybe theyll let me come if I volunteer to help set up or maybe do janitorial

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Brian Desmond
Exchange 03 exposes all of this via WMI. Exchange 5.5 and newer has an API which you can write some CPP and dump a table off and manipulate. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom KernSent: Fri 1/6/2006 2:29 PMTo:

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread mike kline
Looks like DEC is a great event and a lot of the heavy hitters and MVP's from this list will be there. Just wondering about it, is this a good conference for the average AD admin/designer or is this aimed at the advanced experts. I think my company will send some of us so I'm trying to get a

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Eric Rasmuson
This script should do exactly what you're looking for. http://gsexdev.blogspot.com/2004/12/listing-file-sizes-of-all-exchange.html I've used some of Glen Scale's other scripts. His is a very useful Exchange blog. Eric From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom

RE: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Parris
Its was a long way to travel London Vancouver last year but I went with an open mind, but I found the event to be very informative and I am glad I went. This year I am doing the west coast trip again to experience the delights of DEC and this year to cater for varying levels of AD

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Parris
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 As a by the way if any expats or people in the know want something typically English bringing over let me know. The likes of Red Phone boxes; London Buses or Beefeaters are not included. The likes of English mustard, Jam and sweets are.

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Robert N. Leali
Lazy way to do it ... run the Microsoft Exchange Best Practices Analyzer Tool against all your servers and stores. When you view the report under detailed view under statistics summary, it will give you number of mailboxes and size of the store for both public and

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
we almost forgot and a rubber chicken! ;-) Jorge From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick Sent: Fri 2006-01-06 18:37 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 I'll get right on that... -Original

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Robert N. Leali
Miss read your post initially but I think you might not have dug down deep enough in the ExBPA tool. I think the info is there by server ... Admin Group - First Admin Group Exchange Sevrers Name of Server Information Store First Storage Group MailBox Store (server name)

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-06 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Okey dokey. I figured this out after a bit of repro in my lab. Its kinda interesting. So, basically the duplicate GPO processing is a function of using Loopback policy in merge mode only (replace mode doesn't cause this). And, when I looked at the userenv log, it made total sense why it was doing

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Fuller, Stuart
Aimed at both Hunter and I are "average" AD admins and have found it very useful. The best part is sitting aroundat night talking with Joe and Dean.:-) _Stuart Fuller From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike klineSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:34

[ActiveDir] Exmerge Script Utility

2006-01-06 Thread Stu Packett
Title: Exmerge Script Utility Exchange 2003 SP1 I am about to do an Exmerge, but I have to manually enter over 1100 subject lines. This is very time consuming. I also don't have any scripting experience. Is there an application out there that will do an Exmerge script for me? Thanks in

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange store size

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Arnold
I thought Ford made that model? Regards, Mark Exchange MVP who just could not let this years daftest Exchange question go without comment. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley Sent: 06 January 2006 19:38 To:

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
 Correct. The behavior can be changed by various commercial tools. Probably one of the best known (and cheapest) is ChooseFrom. http://www.ivasoft.biz/choosefrom.html From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:55

[ActiveDir] USB Detection in my Network

2006-01-06 Thread Ravi Dogra
Hi All, Is thr any way by which i can check for USB Enabled PCs in my Network. I have been given a task to generate a report for any kind of Vulnerability. Thanks in advance. -- Ravi Dogra List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange - Send As

2006-01-06 Thread Michael B. Smith
Mark's content-transfer-encoding is set to base64/utf-8, and "more than likely" the message format properties of your default pop3 virtual server are incompatible. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:55 AMTo:

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006

2006-01-06 Thread Brian Desmond
Oh you mean you witnessed them being civil to each other? That doesn't happen too often, especially after hours. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Fuller, Stuart Sent: Fri 1/6/2006 5:30 PM To:

RE: [ActiveDir] Exmerge Script Utility

2006-01-06 Thread Tony Murray
Title: Exmerge Script Utility Hi Stu Can you provide a little more information on what it is you are trying to do. It may be that scripting using something other than ExMerge (e.g. CDOEX) would be the better option. Tony From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stu

[ActiveDir] Exchange Does Not Always Use Local GCs

2006-01-06 Thread Tony Murray
Very interesting blog entry from the MS Exchange team: http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/01/05/416998.aspx Tony