Hello,
I'd like to know if it is possible to delete *only
one* object in the tombstone instead of purging all the objects ?
Thanks,
Yann
Hello
Tiroa,
it is not
possible to purge Tombstones, no matter if one or all. For all you'd be able to
modify tombstone lifetime and the system time, however I strongly doubt this
would be supported by MS (tombstone-lifetime is supported, modifying systemtime
to enforce garbage collection
Hi,
In an environment running Exchnage 2003 SP1
under Windows 2003 SP1...I've delegated WP (write property) on the member
attribute of a mail-enabled distribution list to a specific user. That
user is nowable to modify the members of the group via ADUC (the change
does get applied), but
Nothing specific, but I think you can say that the Exchange-enhanced ADUC is trying to do something it doesn't need to do. You have a better answer which is to give the user a different tool. Trying to remember if the Outlook tools allow you to manage the groups (I believe they will if you have
Outlook does indeed let you manage groups if, in ADUC, you
tick the check box "Manager can update membership list" and you define a manager
of the list (on the "Managed By" tab).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Monday, May 22, 2006
The Exchange GUIs (and many MSFT GUIs) are traditionally
bad with this kind of stuff.The GUIs will suprisingly often require more
permissions than you really need to do things because they aren't necessarilly
doing the work correctly. On the flip side MSFT likes to try and enforce
security
Most likely I'll use that "Manager can
update" attribute and have him do this via Outlook. The end user
previously had ADUC for this when permissions werealso 'abit
heavy'(!), so I didn't even have that in mind at first, and then of course
I got curious about the errors...
Thanks for
Title: [OT] Service ChangeConf
Is there another way to delegate the startup type of a service besides using CC (ChangeConf), this would be fine but it also gives whomever has access to change the service context to localsystem.
-Brandon
Thanks. I suspectedthiswhen
both DSMODand ADMODmodified the object without error during
testing. We'd rather go with the principal of least
privilege!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:35 PMTo:
Title: [OT] Service ChangeConf
I don't believe so, at least not through the SCuM, it isn't
that granular. You would need to delegate the actual registry value for startup
and allow the "admin" to get to that value to tweak it
manually.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
Hello Ulf,
Thank you very much for your answer and have a nice day.
Best Regards,
Yann
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] de la part de Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Date: lun. 22/05/2006 14:34
À: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Objet : RE: [ActiveDir] Delete only one object in the
You're welcome, and have a nice day too!
Gruesse - Sincerely,
Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Profile Publications:
blocked::http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F
2F1214C811D
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811
D
Weblog:
I have a web server running IIS6 hosting 3 websites-using host header.
How can I access the individual URL using IP?
-Z.V.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
: -Original Message-
: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue
: Sent: Tuesday, 23 May 2006 10:54 AM
: To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
: Subject: [ActiveDir] IIS 6
:
: I have a web server running IIS6 hosting 3 websites-using host
What if all 3 websites uses the same name, index,html?
-Z.V.
Ken Schaefer wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue
: Sent: Tuesday, 23 May 2006 10:54 AM
: To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
: Subject:
Ignore... I figured it out.
Z.V
Za Vue wrote:
What if all 3 websites uses the same name, index,html?
-Z.V.
Ken Schaefer wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue
: Sent: Tuesday, 23 May 2006 10:54 AM
: To:
A hosts file does the trick.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 8:54 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir]
I wouldn't be adverse to seeing at least adfind and admod in the support or
resource kit tools. :)
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B.
Simon-Weidner
There is quite a bit of docs out there on designing good
disk subsystems for Exchange. It comes down to how many IOPS are needed. If your
design isn't around that, you will probably end up with issues.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
Access is crap to use for a multiuser app. Don't discount the fact that the
perf could be simply related to that.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade
Sent:
How will the remote site users be using the local DC? Will
Exchange be local? Anything besides domain function on the DC? If no to both of
those items, a single RAID 1 will _probably_ be ok but that is shooting from the
hip knowing nothing about your environment or your directory soYMMV. As
This is a dart thrown against a wall. Use it for a starting
point but make sure you verify it makes sense for your environment. I have been
in environments where that recommendation is actually high and others where it
is woefully low. Again with the Eric comments, test test test and verify
What are you looking for? Redundancy, speed, pure capacity?
If you are just looking for a place to stick all of these
images and you want fast access to them and redundancy isn't important (i.e.
your daily backups are good enough) you could go with a stripe set. If you need
the redundancy
Yep I agree with Steven here.
If you really feel you need to change this, stop feeling
that way. ;o) It can impact mail delivery when someone tries to respond to a
message as well as calendar entry ownership, etc.
If you ABSOLUTELY must change the legacyExchangeDN, then
search the
Yep, this is a PITA in Windows. It is why you should have
really good process and standards around ACLing. Thing is most people don't
think about it until after they are in trouble.
Take a look at the script at http://rallenhome.com/books/ad3e/source/ch_26_list_aces.vbs.txt,
it shows you
I agree with Al, the solution is in the wireless hardware
for this, not in AD.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Friday, May 19, 2006 8:33 AMTo:
Speaking of Exchange...
Any good resources for Exchange info?(IE real world lessons, etc) I just got told today that we are going to be leaving a company we just bought on Exchange instead of migrating them to lotus notes (Talk about dodging a bullet). Sadly I have not done Exchange work since
Title: Message
I would set the output up for csv output (see -csv) which
will make things easier to parse out. Once parsed you should be able to drive
the modifications pretty easily.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL
Does the application dictate what the directory can do?
Or should the directory dictate what the application does?
But
Exchange isn't the only app for the directory... Exchange is generally
leveraging the NOS directory for E2K+ deployments, now if you got o a resource
forest for
I saw the Wizard and got a heart and a can of
oil.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:02 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re:
As someone else
mentioned, for the storage aspects of Exchange, look at the HP storage docs, I
keep hearing good things about them. In general go to every link on the Exchange
site and read the white papers and docs.
For AD itself, I tend to
lean towards isolating DCs for Exchange into
You need a GPO expert here but it sounds like the GPO
processing is finishing up and it is closing out all of the outstanding
processes it spawned.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Title: Removing ADAM from configuration set
Define "it doesn't
work".
Also go chat with Snyder, he had a fun little tool called
Whack-A-DC that was used for the lifeboats that you may be able to modify for
this.
But yes, the ADAM tools aren't all polished yet, and may
not be polished
That is a trifle scary... Rerun that and see if it has changed, also change
your query to use objectcategory=person instead of objectclass=user unless
you have indexed objectclass, you will find it runs faster that way.
If the counts are still off like that I would start looking for the specific
Yeah if you can get through the boatloads of obnoxious
registration logon crap on the HP site, there are Excel sheets for Exchange and
sharepoint for figuring the hardware you need (storage and servers). Works
great.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
Big fat ditto - and even better in the support tools.
Gruesse - Sincerely,
Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Profile Publications:
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811
D
Weblog: http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
Website: http://www.windowsserverfaq.org
36 matches
Mail list logo
