I believe that you would need to do one of the following.
Either enable LanMan authentication, enable netbios over TCP/IP, disable
Security Options under Settings, Local Policies, Security Options:
Microsoft Network Server and Microsoft Network Client: Digitally sign
communications = disable.
Or
I read in another newsgroup that Microsoft will only release the patch when
there is a great rain in Spain, which would then cause a flood in the Great
Plains, for which you would then need to patch to stop the corruption or
suffer great pains.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Jason
-Original
Hot off the press.
Solution Guide for Windows Security and Directory Services for UNIX
Using Active Directory and Kerberos for authentication and identity store in
a heterogeneous UNIX and Windows IT environment.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=144F7B82-65CF-4105-
I see that in the User Properties, Account tab, Log On To...button,
there is a way to restrict users to logon to only certain workstations. This
seems to be a great way of ensuring that visitors to a facility get very
limited access. Unfortunately I don't see that this feature can be
I would also suggest that for any in-place
upgrade you slipstream any and all hotfixes into your W2K3 media. You can
look at KB article 814847 for more information and it can save you some trouble
for being patched for a particular security issue to upgrade and re-open it
back up again.
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS does SPs now
You should see a "roll-back/recall"
in SUS 2.0. I didn't hear about the SP's being available in
SUS until this morning when I saw that it was something that was available to
be published, so something or someone must have pulled the trigger for this
John,
This link will explain SUS in full detail.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/windowsupdate/sus/susdeployment.asp
Basically it is like bringing a scaled down windows update inside your
firewall. There are some limitations, but as IT branches around the globe
are figuring out there are
Title: Space on computer
The properties only calculate what you
have rights access. No access...No file size counted against properties.
You need to find a utility that uses the backup operator bit, something like
TreesizePro or other space calculating tool.
Jason
-Original
Title: Active Directory Subnets
I have a question about AD Subnets and programmatically adding them to Sites. We have a rather large list of subnets that need to be assigned to Sites and I didn't want to hand-to-hand combat those entries if possible.
I was looking at using this script I
Title: Message
What is group policy
or a GPO?
Group policy is a new Windows term for common configuration settings.
An administrator can create a group policy which applies to users or computers.
This group policy can set certain computer settings such as who can login to
the computer
in each group, with each
group in seperate OU's.
Chris Flesher
The University of Chicago
NSIT/DCS
1-773-834-8477
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crenshaw, Jason
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:38
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: ADS Login Scripts
Perhaps the main script is being
replicated to all DC's but the middle tier script is not. I would check
all DC's to ensure that each part of the script is there.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Fackenthall, Byron
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I was just about to say the same thing; DC's are much easier to compromise
with extra services and features loaded up on them.
As Scotty would say, Aye sir, the more they overtake the plumbing,
the easier it is to stop up the drain.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Gil Kirkpatrick
Tony is correct; there is no impact on legacy clients and applications. If
you are all W2K DC's now, you are using the same existing authentication
mechanism you will be using in native mode.
Most gained benefit - Universal Groups
Newsworthy Side note - no down-level NT 4.0 DC's
Jason
Title: Message
You don't need the AD add-on
extension for 9X clients unless you need the extra functionality such as DFS
failover, same site login, and etc.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Schlegel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003
7:16 AM
To:
I am running the latest version of Norton 8.X on RC2 without any issues as a
managed client.
Jason Crenshaw
Sandia National Labs
-Original Message-
From: Mike Baudino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir]
We use a product called Extremez-IP to handle our Windows challenged
friends. For one, the product forces Mac clients OS 9.x and below to use IP
instead of AppleSmack. It really helps out in file transfers and all the
other network activity one would expect from a fine network product. It
also
17 matches
Mail list logo
