Have you looked at MIIS?
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas W Stelley
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:19 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] How to find non-primary SMTP addresses? Slightly OT
Same topic, but this
Sure. IPsec.
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 5:09 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Shares with Computer Account Permissions
I was asked today whether it was possible to allow
, not just a particular share.
Mike Thommes
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 4:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Shares with Computer Account Permissions
Sure. IPsec
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Shares with Computer Account Permissions
Hi Laura,
That’s what I thought of first but that would stop all traffic to the
server, not just a particular share.
Mike Thommes
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura
can use IPSec to allow or deny access to a network share based on
originating host?
Would you mind elaborating on this a little bit?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:19 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject
. But in this instance it was. So I
find it hard to believe its normal. Thanks for the reply
anyway Laura.
Cheers
M@
On 12/15/06, Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you referring to Performance Monitor? If so, that's normal. You
have to pick the objects and counters that you want
launch the resource monitor from task
manager and its not blank. But in this instance it was. So I
find it hard to believe its normal. Thanks for the reply
anyway Laura.
Cheers
M@
On 12/15/06, Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you referring to Performance Monitor
So Microsoft should encourage their bad practices?
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 12:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Vista GPO
People don't seem to have a
,
_
(, / | /) /) /)
/---| (/_ __ ___// _ // _
) /|_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/ /)
(/
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
HYPERLINK x-excid://3277/uri:http://www.akomolafe.com;
\nwww.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
_
From: Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Fri 12/15/2006 10
into misinformed people? Absolutely. Clueless? Not really. Well,
not among my customers, anyway. :-)
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 2:26 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Vista GPO
Since many of us are in the habit of expressing various opinions, perhaps we
should refrain from characterizing those with which we disagree as the
height of professional arrogance and misinformed. See, if we start doing
that, I might express the opinion that referring to Microsoft's customers as
Are you referring to Performance Monitor? If so, that's normal. You have to
pick the objects and counters that you want to watch.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matheesha Weerasinghe
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 5:34 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Vista GPO
Well said. But while you’re at it, could you let someone know that I very
upset that I can’t manage my Vista GPOs from my Windows ME PC.
Thanks much. ;-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Friday
,
_
(, / | /) /) /)
/---| (/_ __ ___// _ // _
) /|_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/ /)
(/
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
HYPERLINK x-excid://3277/uri:http://www.akomolafe.com;
\nwww.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
_
From: Laura A. Robinson
/uri:http://www.akomolafe.com;
\nwww.akomolafe.com - we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
_
From: Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Fri 12/15/2006 12:50 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Vista GPO
GPO Vault Enterprise (to be called Microsoft Advanced Group Policy
Management) will be part of the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack for SA
is slated for release in Spring/Summer of 2007. The Policy Maker Standard
Edition and Share Manager tools are targeted for a subsequent release.
Laura
Or an even better, more official answer:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/4/F/64F5DC66-832A-4DF3-BAF4-3B4E7FB
9E500/datasheet-faqs.pdf
Q: When can I order Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack for Software
Assurance and when will it be available?
A: You may order Microsoft Desktop
: Vista Activation and KMS
So Laura, correct me if I'm wrong, but are you suggesting we read the white
paper?
Seriously, thank you for all of the input on this matter.
-MM-
On 12/8/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. The entire conversation
of situations
where it just doesn't work well for IT in the real world.
Thanks,
Andrew Fidel
Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/05/2006 04:43 PM
Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
cc
Subject
RE: [ActiveDir
] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: 05 December 2006 01:28
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] NetBT errors 4321
Okay, first question- is the first xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx address the same as the
second xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, or are they actually different addresses? Second,
if we're talking
http://www.websense.com/docs/Datasheets/en/v6.3/Websense_ProductOverview.pdf
http://www.websense.com/global/en/Partners/TAPartners/SecurityEcosystem/
Depending upon which websense product you're referencing, it can be an
appliance or just software.
Laura
-Original Message-
From:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: 05 December 2006 00:57
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Vista Activation and KMS
Actually, it is clearly documented, along with a lot more information on
KMS, MAK and Vista Volume Activation
Infrastructure Consultant
MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777
( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail : see sender address
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tue 2006-12-05
understanding your concerns about autodiscovery. Could you be
more specific about your environment?
Laura
On 12/4/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KMS runs on Vista (now), will run on Longhorn when Longhorn is released, and
will also run
, create a DNS CNAME with a couple of KMS behind it, stuff the
FQDN in the KMS client's registry if you have a standard build, and
fugeddaboutit :-).
On 12/4/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KMS runs on Vista (now), will run on Longhorn
Doh! Okay, now I think I get what you're referencing in item 1.
There's a reason for that- LH isn't out yet. When LH is out, that won't be
an issue. :-)
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:48
, it knows it had better
behave…. :)
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 8:06 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Possessed PCs
The watch thing happened to me until the East
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: dinsdag 5 december 2006 18:20
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is it possible to determine who created an AD
object?
I'd say that you should test it. Create and link a policy where you've set
environment, it might be easier to scrap the whole
autodiscovery, create a DNS CNAME with a couple of KMS behind it, stuff the
FQDN in the KMS client's registry if you have a standard build, and
fugeddaboutit :-).
On 12/4/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
address
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tue 2006-12-05 19:44
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is it possible to determine who created an AD
object?
Have you tested this?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
and workstations - but I haven't
tested this.
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:44:47 -0500
Have you tested this?
_
From: [EMAIL
that aren't TAM supported...
YMMV and all that.
Laura A. Robinson wrote:
I am not at all talking about solutions that don't exist
today. Go to
a Vista machine and take a look at slmgr.vbs.
Laura
. Might be different for local
accounts on member servers and workstations - but I haven't
tested this.
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:44:47
: +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail : see sender address
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tue 2006-12-05 21:17
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is it possible to determine who created an AD
object?
Test what I wrote in my other response
Services
LogicaCMG Nederland B.V. (BU RTINC Eindhoven)
( Tel : +31-(0)40-29.57.777
( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail : see sender address
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tue 2006-12-05 19:44
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
,
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:05 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is it possible to determine who created an AD
object?
Just to make sure everybody understands what I
)40-29.57.777
( Mobile : +31-(0)6-26.26.62.80
* E-mail : see sender address
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Tue 2006-12-05 22:48
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is it possible to determine who created an AD
object?
BTW
Okay, folks, I think I may have an answer to the behavior I've been seeing
with an account that is NOT a Domain Admin but IS an Administrator not
showing as the individual owner of the object when the policy is set to
object creator.
The only thing I can think of is this- I've been doing this all
Which will have no effect on the ownership of the directory objects.
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Is it possible to
Actually, it is clearly documented, along with a lot more information on
KMS, MAK and Vista Volume Activation (btw, Volume Licensing doesn't exist in
Vista; VL and VA are not the same things). You probably don't want to get me
started on a big long explanation of how volume activation works, so
HYPERLINK
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/plan/volact1.mspx#StepsforImp
lementingConfigDeployingKMShttp://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/pl
an/volact1.mspx#StepsforImplementingConfigDeployingKMS
See the section entitled, To install KMS hosts for KMS activation
The short
Okay, first question- is the first xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx address the same as the
second xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, or are they actually different addresses? Second,
if we're talking two IPs, which one is the DC's IP? Basically, I can't get
enough from your genericized [I made that word up] error to figure out
So why not change the default security in the schema so that your service
account is included?
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:23 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
The watch thing happened to me until the East Coast blackout of 2003. I used
to have baskets of dead watches. Since the blackout, I've been able to wear
watches. They still die a lot faster than they do on other people if they're
battery-powered, but at least I can wear 'em now. I also beta tested
KMS runs on Vista (now), will run on Longhorn when Longhorn is released, and
will also run on Win2K3 as soon as we finish making the Win2K3 install. :-)
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
Note to self: read all other responses before typing one of your own. :-)
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 8:50 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Granting rights
)
Laura A. Robinson wrote:
Small point- dcpromo creates those zones as mentioned in
the original
question *if* you have not configured DNS beforehand, *if*
you tell
dcpromo to go ahead and do it for you, and *if* you're building the
forest root domain. If you have configured DNS
Which would probably be a licensing violation. :-)
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 4:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Can you run DHCP on a XP computer??
Yes, I believe there
Of
Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
Inline...
Thanks for replying, Laura!
Sure thing.
You wrote:
Are you able to connect to the server via Computer
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:18 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] dynamic variables within an event log entry?
Okay, the below totally cracked me up. :-) Brian gave you the ADFind
: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
Hey, I thought you loved it when people got all geeky :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: OT: RE
Was the cursor moving in what appeared to be a directed fashion (as if
somebody invisible was moving the mouse), or was it moving around
unpredictably?
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cline
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 11:07 AM
To:
. Good info as always.
Thanks!
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:02 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] dynamic variables within an event log entry?
Nope, it's not a typo
PSS is up to speed on Vista. :-)
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dmitri Gavrilov
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:31 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Vista Stuck on Completing Upgrade
What's DECO? (I'm guessing a typo, but want to make sure you're not
referring to some third-party DHCP service.) If you are referring to the
Microsoft DHCP service, I think whoever told you that is confused, perhaps
by having seen the DHCP client service in the services list?
Laura
_
When I go near wireless mice/keyboards, they stop working. (I can provide
witnesses to this.) Want me to visit your office? ;-)
Laura
P.S. How densely clustered are these users? Does one user's interference
stop if you turn off the other user's mouse? Seems like it'd be a quick way
to verify
The mouse, or the guy?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cline
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 4:38 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Possessed PCs
Yep, that was it. The one guy sitting between them all replaced his
pagefile across disks
(not partitions, disks), you get an associated read/write bump as a result.
P.S. They may have said that in the article you reference below; I didn't
actually click the link and read it. :-)
Laura (Robinson, not Hunter)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
There must be a pagefile on the boot drive in order to facilitate a crash
dump [*if* that is a concern for the environment]; dumps cannot be directed
to another partition. So in that respect, it does matter, but it is not a
hard requirement that there be a pagefile on the boot drive.
Laura
That's only if you select the custom size radio button and try to set it
to less than 16MB. If you select the no paging file option, it works fine.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Brunson
Sent: Thursday, November 30,
When I do that, I try to dedicate an entire spindle to the pagefile, if
possible. It eliminates competition for disk I/O from other sources. If I
can't devote a full spindle, I do tend to do a pagefile partition just
because it gives the pagefile a nice, clean sandbox of its own without data
Larry wrote:
It's also a good idea to split pagefiles across multiple spindles
It will be on a RAID-5 array, so technically yes, it will be
across multiple spindles.
Yup. I usually create a separate partition on the array and drop the
pagefile there. That's mostly just because I'm a
You know, you can actually do your own crashdump analysis. We even used to
teach people how to do it back in the NT4 days. I loved that class. :-D
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Hoehn
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006
Do a 'net search for Active Directory display specifiers. It discusses why
some stuff shows up and other stuff doesn't, as well as how to change it.
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WATSON, BEN
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:35 PM
To:
to know, thanks for the info Laura.
~Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:24 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
That's only if you
Thank you! I've been giving myself a headache trying to remember the name of
the file! I couldn't remember the extension.
That said, Ben, still take a look at the display specifiers whitepaper; not
all attributes display names match the actual attribute names. I've not
checked the one in
Are you able to connect to the server via Computer Management? Meaning, in
the Computer Management console, can you right click on the server and
choose Connect to.. or whatever it says, then connect to the problem
server? If so, can you see the service statuses and event logs on the
server? You
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
Beats having to read SEC17a and NASD guidelines on a saturday night.
Martin Tuip
MVP-Exchange
- Original Message -
From: Laura A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:21 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: OT: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
You know, you can actually do your own crashdump analysis. We
even used
Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 2:21 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: OT: RE: [ActiveDir] Split pagefile
You know, you can actually do your own crashdump analysis. We
even used to teach people how to do it back in the NT4 days.
I loved that class. :-D
Laura
1. This is one of the eight gazillion reasons to discourage the use of
accounts that are Domain Admins for routine purposes that can be achieved
without that level of rights.
2. By default, when a member of the Domain Admins group creates an object in
the directory, the Domain Admins group becomes
Inline...
Thanks for replying, Laura!
Sure thing.
You wrote:
Are you able to connect to the server via Computer Management?
Yes.
Then you can use that to reconfigure the pagefile, making very, very sure
you click Set. :-) After you've connected to it in CM, right click the
something like this once, but I could
be thinking of something else way off base :-(
In any case, I completely agree that delegating the creation right is
the [way!] better option here!
Thanks as always,
DaveC
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura
) tool that popped into my head to do
this. Other suggestions? Thanks!
Mike Thommes
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] dynamic variables
WMI filtering.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:51 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Exclude Vista from GPO
I have a GPO set to install Symantec CE 10 on all machines on
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:16 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain and Subdomain. Duplicating accounts
Besides significantly increasing the likelihood
From the sound of things, he didn't actually raise it at all yet; he
implemented some other change to see if replication was successfully
prevented by his repadmin approach. (not that you're wrong, just that I
don't think he's even encountered that yet)
Now, in answer to the original question,
May I have that fork when you're finished?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura E. Hunter
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: M$
Great, thanks joe. Now I have
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A.
Robinson
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$
May I have that fork when you're finished?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Darren is correct. A quick and simple test- create the following policy and
link it to an OU where you've placed a test user account:
1. User Configuration\Administrative Templates\Start Menu and Taskbar\Remove
Documents menu from Start menu- set to enabled
2. Run gpupdate if you're logged on
That's not entirely accurate, which may be why you see it not working as
advertised. :-)
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/71e76587-28f4-4272-a3
d7-7f44ca50c0181033.mspx?mfr=true
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott,
I may have missed it if somebody already posted this, but Windows PowerShell
is now available for download:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=10ee29af-7c3a-4057-
8367-c9c1dab6e2bfDisplayLang=en
Enjoy!
Laura
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ
Is this the same set of machines that are being talked about in the strange
DC error thread? I don't remember who it was who originated that one and I
want to make sure I'm not asking for something you've already provided.
So, if the answer to the above is no, my next question is, can you
$
I'm too lazy to write and send you the bill (result : no explanation) and
also I'm too bored to enter in this game where you need to be, let's say
important
Over and out (mom)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006
1. Is phmaindc1 a DC for PHIPPSNY.ORG?
2. Is phprint1 a member of PHIPPSNY.ORG?
3. Are you able to provide any of the other information I asked about in my
other response?
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hboogz
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006
Why I asked the questions I asked:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4eventno=1968source=Kerberosp
hase=1 eventno=1968source=Kerberosphase=1
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hboogz
Sent: Thursday,
Then answer my questions! ;-)
Laura
snip
however, i have another thread whereby Kerberos is just killing me.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Besides significantly increasing the likelihood of people logging onto the
wrong domain and generating support calls along the lines of where's my
stuff?
Not really. AD accommodates the same name in multiple domains, as long as
the UPNs are different (which they are, or account creation would
://jacwf.phippsny.orgjacwf.phippsny.org
Secondary File
HYPERLINK http://phippsny.orgphippsny.org Primary
AD-Domain Update Aging
Command completed successfully.
=\
i'm stuck.
On 11/16/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I apologize if I keep asking questions you've already answered, but how many
sites are involved here?
Of course, by the time this hits the list, any replication that hasn't yet
occurred probably will have. :-)
Laura
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
It's not an issue.
Laura
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bart
Van den Wyngaert
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Is it 2000 or 2003?
Well actually I didn't use
]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Kerberos is Killing Me!
AD sites.
3 one including the DR-site.
regarding the question about demoting then promoting...if i have to go that
route, should i keep the same server name ?
On 11/16/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
in that thread.
=)
On 11/16/06, Laura A. Robinson HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then answer my questions! ;-)
Laura
snip
however, i have another thread whereby Kerberos is just killing me.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Clearly there are differing opinions about whether it's merely "slang" or
whether it's an inappropriate slur. Simpler just not to use it, don't you think?
I mean, I don't refer to the USAF as the "useless air farce" and expect its
members to think that's funny.
I
don't take offense when
There's a reason for the "OT" portion of the subject line, you know.
;-)
Laura
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
RutherfordSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 6:42 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
M$
Exactly. M$ just isn't funny. Borg, kool-aid, those are funny. M$ isn't.
Go figure.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta,
Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNASent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:46
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
Disclaimer #1: "You" in the below refers to a generic "you", not a
specific person.
Disclaimer #2: My opinions are in no way intended to represent those of
my employer. They're my own, and they were my opinions long before I became a
Microsoft employee.
That
said...
You
know what I find
You
may doubt it, but I don't. It's a moniker that implies (aside from childishness
on the part of the person who uses it) that Microsoft is a company that is all
about corporate greed. That's an unfair characterization and IMO, is insulting
to the 75%+ of Microsoft employees who spend a
That's the secret share we use for the man. It's where we keep the
collective intelligence that allows us to represent our single self as
multiple entities.
Laura
I am Dsylexia of Borg. Your a$$ will be laminated.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 5:24
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] OT: M$
it's friday, can't we all just get along?
--
Original message -- From: "Laura A. Robinson"
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
