/uri:http:/www.akomolafe.com - we
know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
From: Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thu 1/25/2007 5:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: How
Nope, that's it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cline
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:38 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How to find non-primary SMTP addresses?
Out of curiosity, when setting a
Huh. you're right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wells, James
Arthur
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:44 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] How to find non-primary SMTP addresses?
It should also update the
I'm guessing you didn't like the answers you got on the exchange list?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stu Packett
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:53 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] How to find
I'm forced to ask - why do you want to move SystemMailboxes? You
shouldn't ever need to. There is a reason that the move mailbox wizard
doesn't move them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Condra, Jerry W
Mr HP
Sent: Tuesday, January 23,
What about reversible encryption? (I have no idea if this is required
for the VPN software or not - just a guess.)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Egan
(Temp)
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:39 PM
To:
It may interest you to know that MSFT doesn't really support this
anymore. They've pulled the KB articles on it that used to exist.
Regardless, it still works if you set everything up properly.
1) remove the Everyone and Authenticated Users groups from the
address list that the Default GAL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 6:32 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Different default GALs for different groups
It may interest you to know that MSFT doesn't
Windows Team != Exchange Team
We've (Exchange MVPs) pushed and pushed for this for several patches
over the last few years. Approval cycles, timeframes, requirements, etc.
all differ between the teams. I'm sure politics are involved too.
I think the closest we got was that Exchange 2003 sp2
And performance of same is quite poor. There are a few feature removals
as well.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:26 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Who
You are correct.
However, there is not a supported way to add an additional mAPIID.
I've bugged this twice and it's been closed twice.
A private-only KB documents the process (used to be public, but it was
deemed to be too dangerous).
Jim McBee (another Exchange MVP and author)
You can send-as anything with a SD in the store. :-P
Very commonly used to send from group mailboxes and DGs, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (we use the feature here).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 7:56
I've got boatloads of customers, who do development themselves, who are
rolling out Vista on production desktops.
My staff and I have already become quite facile at loading up XP VMs to
run the stuff that doesn't work on Vista.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I tell my customers 200 ms or better. In cached mode, Outlook 2003 and Outlook
2007 work just fine with that latency (depending, of course, on how much data
you are moving, but “in general”).
If you are “live” and no cached, you really want 80 ms or better, but I don’t
recommend it.
that this material is free from computer virus or any other defect.
Any loss/damage incurred by using this material is not the sender's
responsibility. Liability will be limited to resupplying the material.
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/12/2006 12:31 PM
Exchange2007 on Yahoo Groups (very low volume so far)
PowerShell on Yahoo Groups (very low volume so far)
Plus all the standard Exchange lists have had a little Exchange 2007
traffic.
Of course, most of the people who have been posting are beta-users or
MVPs or TAP people...with RTM that'll
Yeah, but don't try running it on vista.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:34 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Quickbooks
There is a fix for this. I'm pretty sure it's public at this point.
Don't ask me the KB/patchid. It's too late on the east coast after I've
already started having a few
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, November 21,
You can get a list of all the servers and SG's and stores from my blog
post sample here:
http://blogs.brnets.com/michael/archive/2006/07/11/2518.aspx
Once you have that, search on homeMDB equal to the DN for each store and
count the number of results you get.
About a 5 minute job to add these
I use it fairly commonly.
Only several of the lists I frequent, if you use MS, then the
Morgan-Stanley people get all up in arms. And typing MSFT is just too
long. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob
Sent: Thursday, November 09,
If you do a full (normal) backup using a real backup tool (ntbackup,
Veritas with the Exchange Backup Agent, etc) the logs will be flushed.
Period.
For some reason you arent getting a clean backup. Thats what
you need to be checking into.
Temporarily, you can compress (using NTFS
Much much more than that. :-) This is in my company's sweet spot. I'm
really looking forward to the beta.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:11 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is still read, I've
been recently told.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:29 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] The remote
computer has ended the connection.
I wish that were a
: Sunday, October 22, 2006 4:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] The remote computer has ended the connection.
This isn't a wish.. this is a product having issues.
Michael B. Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is still read, I've
been recently told
while i'm sure there are some out there; i've probably got
50+ SBS clients that we host their DNS - they don't tend to have big pipes,
reliable pipes, reliable power,or technical know how (you'd be surprised
how difficult it is to explain the purpose of a PTR record to someone who didn't
Now I understand your appliance architecture and how you
deal with the encryption issues.
This doesn't seem like a smart way to do it, to
me.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manjeet
SinghSent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:26 AMTo:
Title: Message
I took the time to generate the 64 GB tables with the full
US-ASCII character set (I spread it out over a couple of dozen servers and it
only took about a week) last year.
I ran it last week against one of my environments. It
cracked 1,628 passwords out of 1,629 total
Title: Message
Uh, I am the IT security department for a number of my
clients.
Yes, complex passwords were used. Here are a few it
cracked, just as samples:
F0ur.Sc0r3
grVnBEqRo*2Yb
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cK
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
All I can say is that it's about darn time he posted it!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:14 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:Microsoft Exchange Troubleshooting
The feature is in Exchange 2007.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bart Van den
Wyngaert
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:10 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Adding disclaimer on E2K3 on a SBS 2K3 box
No. You need to install the Exchange Management Tools on
places where you need those tabs.
That begin said, review this article and the linked
article:
http://blogs.brnets.com/michael/archive/2004/09/14/209.aspx
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
HBooGzSent:
r I own that book already.I was hoping
to avoid doing the scripting part... but that being said, how much of that will
work in NT domains to get groups and their members/memberships?
On 8/1/06, Michael B.
Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can
certainly get all the piece parts from
You can certainly get all the piece parts from
here:
http://rallenhome.com/books/adcookbook/code.html
And you can use joe's wonderful adfind (or dsquery if you
were to insist) to do much of the gruntwork. I show you some examples
here:
the point of adding that text via the
tool?What's the benefit?
On 7/18/06, Michael B.
Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Feature
request: give me a way, in the attribute list, to specifyarbitrary text
for output. E.g., in this case for disabled: adfind -default -bit
-f"(objectcategory
Feature request: give me a way, in the attribute list, to specify
arbitrary text for output. E.g., in this case for disabled:
adfind -default -bit -f
(objectcategory=person)(objectclass=user)(useraccountcontrol:AND:=2)
-csv -nodn givenname sn text:disabled
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Actually, you've got that a bit
backwards.
The Exchange GUI for 2007 is built completely on
Monad/PowersHell cmdlets. In more recent builds, the GUI displays the cmdlet it
executes to help the admin (if he/she so chooses) to learn the scripting. I
don't think those builds are generally
WMI is deprecated in E12. EMS (the Exchange Management Shell,
today’s “official” name for the Exchange version of PowerShell/Monad) gives one
access to lots and lots of information. So does the next version of mumble.
Further this deponent sayeth not, not being exactly clear
I suspect you are making this overly complicated. Can you state your
query in words?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:14 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] LDAP
Ive seen O2007 display it both ways, and I think its
much more Exchange dependent (whether its been promoted to MAPI format
or continues in Internet format).
The list software should not append a plain text footer to a
base64 message without encapsulating the original message and
Perhaps -af (!(ourProperty=TRUE))
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:32 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OldCmp question
I've
created a new boolean schema property to flag all
http://blogs.brnets.com/michael/archive/2004/06/24/168.aspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Antonio Aranda
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:02 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] exporting list of members of a security
Actually, it's probably 512 bytes to 1024 bytes.
Take a look at edns0, assuming you are running Windows Server 2003.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832223/en-us
And
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828263/en-us
And
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828731/en-us
(I've asked for these three KBs
Ah yes, now that I see the original message - I bet a
quarter it is the edns0 issue with a PIX firewall running a relatively old
version of PIX/os.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin
A.Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 4:37 PMTo:
as you determine the problem, please let us
know so I can bill Michael for $0.25. :-)
Steve
--- Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah yes, now that I see the original message - I bet
a quarter it is the
edns0 issue with a PIX firewall running a relatively
old version of
PIX/os
Yes. I loaded it two nights ago. Pretty cool. First build Ive
found comfortable to use (old POS box no aero).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 12:44 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
See Microsoft KB 327378 (Exchange 2000 and Exchange 2003
mailbox size limits are not enforced in a reasonable period of time; fix
requires Exchange 2000 SP3)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Egbert
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:50 PM
To:
that
are associated with an Exchange Server 2003 mailbox
Is
it really true that you can only install hotfix over SP1 not SP2?
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And more on it:
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/03/22/422799.aspx
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Finally!
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;903158
And more on it:
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2006/03/22/422799.aspx
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:57 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Disabled Active
Do you have Deleted Item Recovery turned on your message store?
KB 178630 and check it out.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:55 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
???
I'm running Windows Mobile 5. I deleted a contact from my handheld (an i-mate
Jasjar) and synched it. The contact I deleted was in my deleted items folder,
just as I expected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley
Sent:
Really -- if DIR is turned on, you shouldn't have to do that. They should
either be in your Deleted Items folder or in Deleted Item Recovery. I just
tested and it worked for me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
A. No.
B. Yes (unless they are downloaded into the personal store and removed).
While there can certainly be exceptions, generally speaking, the right
place for e-mail is the Exchange store. Having the delivery location as
a personal store removes a large number of benefits - including access
to
I
would add that the Exchange Server Disaster Recovery Operations Guide covers a
number of specifics that should be of interest (http://microsoft.com/exchange/library).
In general, it is becoming somewhat rare that I recommend for people to recover
an Exchange server. In a disaster
for /?
An excerpt thereof:
FOR /F "eol=; tokens=2,3* delims=, " %i in (myfile.txt) do
@echo %i %j %k
would parse each line in myfile.txt,
ignoring lines that begin with a semicolon, passing the
2nd and 3rd token from each line to the for body, with
tokens delimited by commas and/or
Lets
here what you did.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor W.
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange - ESM - All Address Lists
and All Global Address Lists disappeared
I
Michael and Tony, I will try it and will let you know the outcome.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: vrijdag 3 februari 2006 2:04
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange - ESM - All Address Lists
and All Global
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: maandag 6 februari 2006 17:06
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange - ESM - All Address Lists
and All Global Address Lists disappeared
This
may sound silly (and in a way, it is), but try accessing them a little
differently
Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: maandag 6 februari 2006 18:40
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange - ESM - All Address Lists
and All Global Address Lists disappeared
Good.
So, can you right click on Address Lists Container in the left
pane and blow the permissions down? (Dont
As Tony said, if they are deleted and you need the specific
contents back, an authoritative restore is your appropriate
response.
If the defaults work for you, you might just try rerunning
forestprep and domainprep, then touching each store setting the GAL for the
store.
I have seen
subinacl.exe from
microsoft.com/downloads
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crawford,
ScottSent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 5:46 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Script to change
owner?
Is there anyway in script
(preferred) or
It may have changed in the last year, since I no longer do
Unity support, but Cisco Unity required you to create a "UnityInstall" account
and use that (with specific permissions of course) to install Unity and any
updates. There is also a UnityAdmin account and there are two Unity Exchange
You
just posted there a little while ago. I was in a meeting. :-P
Exchange
Server 2003 service pack 2 adds functionality to meet this need.
For
earlier versions of Exchange, see
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/884863/
There
might be third party stuff that does what you want,
folder
directory object deletion, is that because Exchange is cleaning up the object
from AD after a user deleted it via mapi?
Thanks again.Sorry i couldn't wait for you to get out of
your meeting :)
On 1/26/06, Michael B. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You just posted
Although my most useful information about tough vbscript questions has
come from here and from Robbie Allen's various books, there is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 12:17
Didn't like my answer in the Sunbelt group, eh?
Server Data Objects are your portable way to do this, regardless of your
domain mode (at least through Windows Server 2003). It wraps the
MprAdminUserSetInfo and MprAdminUserGetInfo functions on both Windows
2000 and Windows 2003.
For example,
Correct. The behavior can be changed by various commercial
tools. Probably one of the best known (and cheapest) is
ChooseFrom.
http://www.ivasoft.biz/choosefrom.html
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:55
Mark's content-transfer-encoding is set to base64/utf-8,
and "more than likely" the message format properties of your default pop3
virtual server are incompatible.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:55 AMTo:
You
shouldnt be attempting to back up the MDBDATA folders at all. Use an
Exchange-aware backup application to back up all Exchange information.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mischler
Timothy J Contractor NASIC/SCNA
Sent: Thursday, January 05,
Yep, you can programmatically create a MAPI profile using any number of
free or for-charge tools.
I personally always liked richprofile.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 2:42 PM
To:
You are Exchange Server 2003,
right?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Creamer,
MarkSent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:39 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD or is this
Exchange task?
I think Im pretty
close on this, but am
You should be able to run it on any Exchange 2003 Server
that hosts a PF store.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:28 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD or is this
Exchange task?
Good
You
should not be able to install a 2003 backend in an administrative group where
you have 2000 front ends. You should be able to install a 2003 front-end in an
administrative group where there are other 2000 front-ends.
function returns true if an error occurred
isFrontEnd, a byref
In regards to the OAB v4 -- it'll appear after it's
generated. A default generation schedule says "overnight".
As to "Manage Settings" issue - I haven't a clue. I haven't
deployed sp2 on my real production servers yet, and my test servers and
mini-prod environment don't exhibit that
Title: [Way OT] DNS MX load balancing questions...
You
should have two separate MX records
@ IN MX 10 mail1.mydomain.com.
@ IN MX 10 mail2.mydomain.com.
Mail1 IN A 10.1.1.1
Mail2 IN A 10.2.2.2
RFC
2821 requires a mail server to choose MX records randomly when the records are
the
The existing mechanism place in Exchange 2003 prior to sp1 was able to
detect problems, and ensure that they didn't cause problems in the
Exchange environment -- however that could mean that a store was shut
down when a -1018 was detected. And that's a real problem to the user
environment!
This
script enumerates all the Windows profiles on a computer and then lists all the
MAPI profiles for each user too.
If
a computer is turned on and no firewall is getting in the way and the Remote
Registry service is running, you can access any key/value on the computer
remotely.
] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:36 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Scripting/WMI/MONAD - was FSMO role transfer
I gotta tell ya -- I just started vbscript-ing a few years ago (with
great
help from joe and Alain here) -- C# with .NET 2.0
everyone on board up
front early complaining if that is the only thing that is going to make
Exch
Dev listen.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:36 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject
I gotta tell ya -- I just started vbscript-ing a few years ago (with
great help from joe and Alain here) -- C# with .NET 2.0 just rocks
(whether fat or not -- need to use those 64 bits for SOMETHING). Visual
C# 2005 makes it a breeze...I'm looking forward to the managed classes
for Exchange etc.
It can be. It's easily scripted.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] FSMO role transfer
That's
There is no way for MS to think of every eventuality and to support
every possibility that a customer (or even a large group of customers)
may want and/or desire.
At NT4 and before, if that was the case, you were pretty much SOL;
unless you could do some pretty heavy C-or-C++ coding.
Starting
It is not supported to change the name of a server on which Exchange is
installed.
Thus you can't change the name of a DC while Exchange is installed upon
it. Exchange will break.
For more information: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/842116
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
public
folder wackoness after a domain rename that needed some hotfixes.
Michael B. Smith wrote:
It is not supported to change the name of a server on which Exchange
is installed.
Thus you can't change the name of a DC while Exchange is installed
upon it. Exchange will break.
For more
tools for Exchange 2003. The following
are available as separate downloads.
* /Exchange Domain Rename Fixup:/ Repairs Exchange Server attributes
in Active Directory after using the Windows Server 2003 domain
rename tool
Michael B. Smith wrote:
I don't see anything
. Not Microsoft approved of course, would not recommend it and
Sharepoint freaks.
Michael B. Smith wrote:
I don't see anything in that article that disagrees with what I said.
You can't change the name of a DC while Exchange is installed on it.
In fact, the article you quote specifically agrees with me
] Rename domain - DC with Exchange installed
See follow up note regarding reading comprehension level on a Monday.
Michael B. Smith wrote:
Those still agree with me.
You can't change the name of a DC while Exchange is installed on it.
This means you can't rename a domain if Exchange is installed
t'cha
Disabling OpenGL screen savers used to be a constant battle
for me with my SBS'er clients.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 6:41
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
Here is why you don't do it:
http://blogs.msdn.com/stephen_griffin/archive/2004/07/03/172257.aspx
See also KB 266418 -- it isn't
supported.
Here is a small script that sends e-mail that you can use
instead:
http://blogs.brnets.com/michael/archive/2004/11/30/251.aspx
From: [EMAIL
Script it.
For a single server, it's really pretty easy.
I provide a canned solution using a handleful of scripts, blat, and
ServersAlive to loads of my small customers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz -
It was made in the Exchange product team meetings with the
Exchange MVPs.
I can assure you, our reaction was not positive. I think it
is a serious mistake.
M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:03 AMTo:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=DCCE0536-7EDC-40B4-9950-8B6906ABDA2Ddisplaylang=en
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sem
3Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:03 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding IP's to
expand into why you think 64bit only would be a problem? I'd
like to at least understand this a bit better. If you need to, feel
free to drop the note off-line so we don't drift too far OT.
Al
From: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir
Is your CA onWindowsServer 2003in a
Windows 2000 domain?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding,
DevonSent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 11:44 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] CertSvc
Error
I keep getting these errors on my
root
Wow, that's pretty harsh, don't you think?
Are only MS employees and Directory Services MVPs allowed to make
smart-ass comments or have opinions?
Ed is a very well known and well respected Exchange MVP.
And he happens to be right, in my opinion. Any Exchange administrator
should be well aware
It's been discussed
here several times. An interesting read:
http://blogs.technet.com/exchange/archive/2005/11/04/413669.aspx
Exchange Server 2003
Service Pack 2 DSProxy Referral Process
Changes
From a book proposal I wrote:
According to the United States Small Business Administration (the US SBA, at
http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/arsbfaq.txt), small firms:
* Total approximately 23 million in the United States.
* Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms.
* Employ half of all private
Honestly, that looks like a mismatched MTU to me. It's
worth checking.
If you turn off EHLO, as someone else suggested, that
should limit the maximum size of the TCP packet rather
dramatically...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Thursday,
ng, its an IPsec tunnel NOT a gre tunnel.
The mtu size on my side is the default for a cisco 2600 router(i think
thats the setting of the media being used in the router-
etherenet=1500,etc).
Thanks
On 10/13/05, Michael B.
Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Honestly
Not enough information.
Is this one of it's domains for whichthe Exchange
serverhas a recipient policy? That's the most likely
reason.
Can you tell us more about the
scenario?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:33
1 - 100 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
