bridgeheads - typically this would
be a more powerful computer as it will now be responsible for more.
Good article to review for this can be found here:
http://www.mcpmag.com/Features/article.asp?EditorialsID=297
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified
And, for those of you that have not had the opportunity to meet or
listen to Levon - a smarter guy on DNS is hard to come by. A very
knowledgeable, intelligent guy.
Not a JUST good second choice - Levon is tops at his own game.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft
is where the computer objects ARE (i.e. the
computer container)
Thanks,
Yusuf
[RTK] You're welcome!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur
Frank,
Unless you have a particular need to use TLS, I'd forego it and use SSL
over LDAP. It's easy to set up and manage.
Here's a Q Article to guide you step by step on implementation:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q247078
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT
on your
return, yes? ;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Site Transports. And, in this would be the
Default-First-Site-Name (again, great name).
If you confirm that you have complete coverage of the link topology
(enough for the KCC to create the entire spanning tree) the erros will
resolve and the replication topology will be restored.
Rick Kingslan
this (generically - I'm not going to
hunt down the keys to solve this one issue) I can provide guidance on
how to create entries to the ADM files to create these 'tatoos' of the
registry.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any
Title: Message
Vladmir,
H. Yep - blew that one. samDomainBase is a class - not an
attribute. Many pardons, but it's apparently not what I though it
was.
Thanks
for clearing this up. I'll look into it further later.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft
Certified Trainer MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
- in place to control the creation of Universal groups
without change control or justification.
Maybe someone else will have more light to shed on this.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced
domains in a forest. A forest is more synonomous to a Windows NT 4.0
domain when viewed from a autonomous security context)
Hope this helps - and gets the discussion going
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any
,
(the second to the last perm - whatever that is don't remember), and
Associate External Account.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from
Title: Message
blush
Thanks!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur C.
Clarke
-Original Message-From:
to the right questions to ask.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Justin,
You'll find that clients keep an open channel, if you will, to DCs for
SYSVOl, etc. This is done over Port 445.
HTH!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
Marc,
Are you also backing up the system state data when you do this full
backup? And, restoring it, for that matter?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable
Marc,
Are you doing a System State Backup as well (is System State checked)?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
Marc,
Are you also backing up the system state data when you do this full
backup?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
Have you tried removing the RUN command from the Start Menu via Group
Policy?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
Richard,
Sure, I build a fire and you come throw water on it. Damn you! :-)
Thanks for this. I do now remember this. Thanks for the correction. I
do, somehow, think that we've strayed from the original requstors needs.
:-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft
will be along around 2005 - 2006.
Thanks for the input, Brian. And keep up the good work down there in
Fla. I'm taking a serious look at AA, Sec Reporter and Sec Disc.
Looking PRETTY good.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
You're
very welcome, and thanks for the thanks!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft
Certified Trainer MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows
2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]"Any sufficiently advanced
technologyis indistinguishable from magic." --- Arthur
Lori,
Is there a problem you're trying to correct, or is this just an error that you're
concerned about?
Many times, the Trust Relationship erros can be ignored - unless you are having a
particular problem. Then, I'd suggest further diagnosis with either NLTEST or NETDOM.
Rick Kingslan
Ernesto,
Help me to understand what you're doing. You say that 'After defining
it at the domain level' you go back and change the settings on each
container.
What container are you changing settings on and what settings are you
changing?
The reason that I'm asking is because the Lockout
Kevin,
You're spot on with the .dll. It's DSAdmin.dll that does the primary
work in AD UC with a CLSID of {E355E538-1C2E-11D0-8C37-00C04FD8FE93}.
This would have been the CLSID of the interface missing from Daniel's
post.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified
.
IIRC, there is no way to capute the Console session absolutely with TS -
but then I could be wrong.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur
Errr, check that. If you have more than 4GB - (and want to USE it).
Server - 4 Procs, 4GB of RAM
Adv Serv - 8 Procs, 8GB of RAM
Data Center - 32 Procs, 64GB of RAM
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any
Kevin -
Point taken. In this context, you are correct.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message
Title: Message
Yep. It will be an external trust based on NTLM. External
trusts are not affected by a seitch to native mode.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technol
Gil and Joanna,
I've created, as a demo for an MS class that I taught over a year ago,
an ASP page that used ADSI calls to do much of this. Not too tough.
I'll see if I can dig it up, if you would forward me your e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000
tring MUST BE EXACTLY 20 characters in length, including the
\0x1b, and muct be in double quotes.
Take a
look at this Q for more:
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q245172
Good
luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Window
prompted during the verification for credentials to verify the
trust - cancel out.
These are the notes that I found after being pinged by Diane's post.
Hope this helps!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
MCSE on Windows 2000
MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]
Any
.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
as
a second acquisition is Jeremy Moskowitz's book on Windows 2000 Group
Policy, Profiles and IntelliMirror.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic
other tool. It might be easier to
come up with a solution if we understood the need. Is there a particular
application or problem that is being posed?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently adv
- not the
user. This is not a currently very popular belief.
If you don't do it this way, you willhave to go back as a Domain Admin
group member and take ownership of the folder the first time a user
needs help with their stuff.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft
Kevin,
What ARE the errors that you're getting with NTFRS? FRS log?
What are the errors that are showing up in th DS log, system log?
These will go a long way to helping us help you. Otherwise, MHO, we're
shooting in the dark.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft
, for that clarification.
I would like to carry on this conversation outside the list, so if you
would forward me you e-mail address, I'd appreciate it.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any
-
From: Rick Kingslan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 7:07 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Can you isolate a virus to an OU?
Gil,
Thanks for this clarification. I'll have to get ahold of
Stuart and
get a further insight on this. As to that article
to talk to. :-)
Here'a link to this book - this is one of the few books that has earned
a permanent place in my traveling library.
http://btobshop.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=2MO
3BBOVELbtob=Yisbn=1578702429
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft
a
classic memory leak, but again, I haven't been able to find where/what it
is.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur
Title: Message
Eric,
It
might be easier to answer this one if you help narrow down the scope. Why
are the current methods not acceptable? Are you looking for a scripted or
a programmed solution?
A bit
of detail and we'll gladly offer an opinion, at the very least!
:-)
Rick Kingslan
Title: Message
Marvin,
Going
to Linux is not going to solve the problem. Linux uses the same basic DNS
methodology, so learning DNS would resolve it, and prevent you from having to go
to Linux.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP
this helps!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur C.
Clarke
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
of AD) is the
only way to make this happen. Removing stale records or attempting to
remove a server from the 'gone server' once it's already been removed is
like closing the barn door once the horse is already out. You're a bit
late to prevent the problem.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT
, no - it won't.
Hope this helps - I apologize for any misunderstanding I might have
created (or, panic - for that matter!).
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from
Strange, yes. But, this given the fact that in Windows NT 4.0 I had an
impossible time making them STAY! ;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic
, allow the client to KNOW
which DC to authenticate with.
Everyone else gave you great advice on the DNS stuff, so I'll let that
stand.
Good
luck!
Rick Kingslan - MVP
[Windows NT/2000 Server] Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I
on Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000"Any sufficiently
adv
Joshua,
Ummm Can't add much here. The domain and records are hosted on your
DNS, so the redirection of the name server records at NetSol should be
it.
You have a minimum of two DNS for this purpose, right?
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified
of a few other things.
You won't get, in addition to bunches of other stuff, Group Policy
application, Kerberos authentication (though you'll get NTLM v2), etc.
As to Native mode - I can't think of any reason that you must be on
SP6a. Though, I could be wrong. :-)
Hope this helps.
Rick
. Not, however for mixed mode logon. GC's
are nice to have, especially if you want to use UPNs for logon.
In fact, if EN is using UPN's, the user will be denied.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently
IIRC, that will require anonymous access as an interorgperson is not an
authenticated (via the trusting system).
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from
in the fact that LMHOSTS *DOES*
still matter! :-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
?ArticleID=23565
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=21128
Enjoy!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
Marvin,
Look at this Q article:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q216498ID=KB;EN
-US;Q216498
Common problem...
HTH!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
reliabilty solution with Exchange,
where another DC is the reliability solution with Domain Controllers.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic
!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur C.
Clarke
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
460. Detailed
explanation of both Authoritative and
Non-authoritative.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur
' Jedi...)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Kevin,
Good redirect. Good article, too!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
new records, no modify
or delete), it is somewhat of an onerous process.
Though, I have used LDIFDE in the past, but wrote the script to preapre
the LDIFDE input file.
Let me know if you require specific code snippets on how to make this
happen.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000
Title: Message
Brian,
AD-integrated is going to point to itself.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur
well in the
test environment with a copy of our current forest.
My .02 worth...
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
in the other domains should
become cut off from the forest DNS, then it makes it kind of hard for
the locals to locate the GC and, in some cases, other DC replication
partners.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently
a commitment to
a direction and securing itthat is the hard part.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft
Certified Trainer MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows
2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]"Any sufficiently advanced
technologyis indistinguishable from magic." --- Arthur C.
Clarke
-Origin
information. Notify from the
Primary is a good thing to have as well.
Now, if the Unix DNS is set up to recognize any and all comers that
request, well - that's a potential security problem. ;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows
Eric,
Good call - another good book. Bill English does a fine job with this
book.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
, especially
in this case where it has already been conceded that the requester is a
newbie?
Just interested in your opinion. What am *I* missing?
Thanks!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced
in
the trenches where all the FUN is!).
The ResKit have their place, and I appreciate MS making this information
available. My personal fav in ResKit is about 20 pounds and 7000 pages
- the CD tools alone for W2K server are worth the price of admission!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000
learn it anyway. ;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
. This is opposite of the way that GPO works, as the
farther from the Local settings we get, the less effect local settings
can impose.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
, as the Local would take precedence in this case.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072129484/qid=1020227433/sunbeltunivers0c/002-7561459-5001646
Enjoy!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur
With all due respect, that is what the active sessions do indicate - not
LOCAL sessions at the DC console, but the sessions established via
network connections.
Dirk is 100% correct. It can be controlled via that interface.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified
Title: Message
James,
Thanks
for tossing this out there. Yes, there are some great features to this,
and it puts a GREAT face on HFNetchk. There are a few folks that have
complained of inconsistent results, but I haven't experienced it
yet.
Overall, great tool.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft
Wade,
There are three that are a 'must have'
http://support.microsoft.com
http://www.microsoft.com/technet
http://www.eventid.net -- I suspect this is the one that you're
looking for.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I
Masters MUST be on different DC's in a multi-domain
environment.
And, having all your eggs in one basket (all FSMO's on one box will
work) is not best practice by any means.
Good luck, Rob!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT
It was there yesterday. In fact, it's there right now.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message
True, you can build (RBFG) a RIS floppy boot disk, but only if it's a
supported NIC. Not all can be emulated through the floppy PXE routine.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
point for how you want to design
a domain structure. But, unless you have differing security
requirements, keep it simple to a single domain with OU's and delegation
of authority at the OU level.
Just my .02 worth.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified
Eric,
Tell me I'm reading this wrong - two different forests - one for each
company - each forest with two domains? Or, is this a new forest with
two trees (tree root domains)?
Thanks!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT
root.
Political or namespace issues, separate trees. Don't get along or lack
of trust - separate forests.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic
events.
These things never play out as we even plan, as you well know from your
experiences.
That's why the lists and newsgroups can be so much fun. We get to
speculate and surmise, without ever having to really gather information
about the other side
;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows
understand it (unless there are two in the same
room, and then their interpretation will differ) and their word is
marginally binding.
Get it? OK - then explain it to me back, because I've so confused
myself AGGGH!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified
you get
above, say, 100.
They do have some newer programs associated with License 6.0 (yes, MS
DOES version their license programs!) for the Small Office / Home Office
segment.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any
Then, you'll need to access this link and follow the directions
carefully. This procedure is very successful in the many cases where I
have used it.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q216498ID=KB;EN
-US;Q216498
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft
in Forest B?
Or, vice versa?
Consider this the same (in very high altitude terms) the Domain Admin in
DomainCorp.local and the Domain Admin sales.corp.local. Does the
Domain Admin in either domain have any administrative permission in the
other?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified
Trainer
/ no site.
But, at a cost of no autonomy for the locations with no DCs. Hmmm.
It's a six of one, half-dozen of another, I suppose. But, I don't know
your business requirements and technical policy, either. ;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA
Joseph,
True. I wouldn't recommend turning this setting of in an AD environment
- unless this was an outward facing connection to the Internet. Not
everyone is interested in hearing our machine's pleas for a DNS that
will kindly do DDNS updates...
;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows
of the PDC
emulator in Win2k to a BDC. From there, a BDC can replicate it to the
rest of the BDCs using LMRepl.
As I said, not pretty, but it does get the job done.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any
Joshua,
Yep, sure is. Check here -
http://www.bookpool.com/.x/reasw5jj8m/ss/1?qs=windows+XP+resource+kit
HTH!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from
folks end up anyway ;-)
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
--- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
missing something?
Also, do you get an opprtunity to look at the event logs to get a
picture of what events are associated with the failure?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
MCSE on Windows 2000
MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]
Any sufficiently advanced
, (possibly answered above) if another machine with the Admin
tools on the net attempts to access using AD Users and Computers, what
happens?
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
MCSE on Windows 2000
MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]
Any sufficiently advanced
This is for our less experienced Group Policy readers, as I know that
David is well versed in this
You will not be able to assign the Group Policy settings to the default
Users container - it must be assigned at the OU, Domain, or Site object
to be of any use.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan
migration plan is of some value as
well.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur C. Clarke
-Original Message-Fro
/repairandrecovery/filerestore.asp
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer MCSE+I on
Windows NT 4.0 MCSE on Windows 2000 MVP [Windows NT/2000
Server]"Any sufficiently advanced technologyis indistinguishable
from magic." --- Arthur C.
Clarke
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL
. It will, however,
not allow you to modify the NetBIOS domain name. You're stuck with the
downlevel name. Again, until .Net.
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
MCSE on Windows 2000
MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]
Any sufficiently advanced technology
, and all domains in a forest share schema and
configuration partitions. Hence, no autonomy.
Good luck!
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
MCSE on Windows 2000
MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from
Yeah, yeah - would be like you to jump in and take the EASY one!
How goes, Dean?
Drop me a note - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Kingslan - Microsoft Certified Trainer
MCSE+I on Windows NT 4.0
MCSE on Windows 2000
MVP [Windows NT/2000 Server]
Any sufficiently advanced technology
901 - 1000 of 1005 matches
Mail list logo
