Lazy
way to do it ... run the Microsoft Exchange Best Practices Analyzer Tool against
all your servers and stores. When you view the report under detailed view
under statistics summary, it will give you number of mailboxes and size of the
store for both public and
Miss read your post initially but I think you might not
have dug down deep enough in the ExBPA tool. I think the info is there by
server ...
Admin Group -
First Admin Group
Exchange Sevrers
Name of Server
Information Store
First Storage Group
MailBox Store (server
name)
It would be nice if the LimitLogin V 1.0 functionality were built into
AD some how. Haven't looked in a while. Maybe they've come out with
something better.
Robert
The information contained in this e-mail transmittal, including any attached
document(s) is confidential. The information is
Response Engineer Northeast Region Microsoft Corporation Global
Solutions Support Center
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert N. Leali
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 2:38 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FRSDiag
for keywords - as long as
those entries are in your logs ( until the logs wrap) you will get the
alert. The real deal is to see if your latest log entries have the same
error.
my .02
steve
- Original Message -
From: Robert N. Leali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent
I'm getting the following error when I run the FRSDIAG utility.
FRSDiag v1.7 on 6/28/2005 8:08:25 AM
.\jao-dc1 on 2005-06-28 at 8.08.25 AM
Checking for errors in Directory
, Security+ Infrastructure Rapid
Response Engineer Northeast Region Microsoft Corporation Global
Solutions Support Center
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert N. Leali
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:15 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
I have a single domain, multi-site environment, Windows server 2003
standard version. I have two DC's sitting on the same subnet that are
replicating to each other and both are Global Catalog Servers. When one
of the DC's go down, users loose access to resources (i.e. Exchange 2003
can't look up
GCs as well? I believe that they both need to be so if you
want them to failover for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Robert N. Leali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 3:11 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DC not failing over in single
Maybe you could install Virtual PC on the box with the tape drive and do
the restore into a virtual environment??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:04 PM
To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
Subject:
This is an interesting/humerous article that ran on the topic in June of 2004
about Time, Inc.'s disclaimer and it's validity.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2101561/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe
Sent: Sat 1/22/2005 2:59 PM
To:
risk based on
the information you plan to give out.
Email addresses are a unique identifier by the way.
And usually public knowledge.
From: Robert N. Leali
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert N.
LealiSent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:18 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgS
out.
Email addresses are a unique identifier by the way. And usually
public knowledge.
From: Robert N. Leali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert N. Leali
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:18 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
Can someone point me to a white paper or article that gives the pros and
cons and security implications of allowing a semi-trusted third-party to
access our AD with an LDAP export to an RSA server?
We are being asked to allow our users to authenticate to a third party
web portal using their
your directory away to a
semi-trusted third party? Did I paraphrase that correctly?
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert N. Leali
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] LDAP
e any action to protect
myself?"
Some folks wouldn't have a problem giving out that
information. Others would. You'll need to assess that risk based on
the information you plan to give out.
Email addresses are a unique identifier by the way.
And usually public knowledge.
From
One more thing you might look at make sure you can see all the
hidden and system files on the box, do a select all and then right click
on properties and see what total size and size on disk being used by the
files is. Then compare it against what is being reported as used space
by windows.
Do you have the site DC/DNS box using itself as the alternate DNS server
and the HQ as primary? just a thought.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;291382
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent:
WehadproblemsprocessingthemachinepoliciesandlogonscriptstillwemadechangesinourCiscoswitchesand turned on Fast
Port.Here'salinktoanarticle.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html
I read Dell switches also show the same
symptoms.
Robert
From: [EMAIL
It is possible to get virus infections even with current
virus definitions. My experience with Nachi/Welchia and 5000+ workstations
at my last employer taught me that. If you have Nachi/Welchia in your
system on just one machine, it's going to continually try to find
to a crawl at
times.
I thought patching just
prevents those holes from being exploited but does not prevent you from getting
the virus and having it use your machine to attack another unpatched
one.
Am I
wrong?
thanks
From: Robert N.
Leali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday
is causing this? I'd make sure auditing is turned on for your
domains ecurity policy and start looking at failure records on your DCs.
That aside, ADModify.Net can probably do this.
--Brian
-Original
Message-
From: Robert
N. Leali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Kerberos question
What is the easiest way to unlock multiple
user accounts in Active Directory? Random accounts locked up today and I need
a way to unlock them without having to go user by user. Is there a tool or
script already written?
Any help would be appreciated.
Robert
I think Im having the same problem
at my site and havent been able to isolate or resolve. Basically,
the mapped shares time out with a red X. I saw on a Microsoft
article than you can increase the time out period on a W2K or W2K3 server
share, but not sure if this is the solution as not
has been configured?
--
Jake
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
N. Leali
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004
9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Summer
Maintenance
I think you can use Unicast instead of
Multicast in the newer
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Summer Maintenance
I think you can use Unicast instead of
Multicast in the newer versions of Norton ghost. It goes slower but it wont
bog down the network. Also, make sure your hop count is set correctly.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo
