Re: [ActiveDir] Please help me

2006-12-07 Thread jpsalemi
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4321eventno=1822source=NetBTphase=1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] p.com.br

Re: [ActiveDir] Please help me

2006-12-07 Thread jpsalemi
ooops, sorry replied to the wrong one [EMAIL PROTECTED] p.com.br Sent by:

RE: [ActiveDir] NetBT errors 4321

2006-12-07 Thread jpsalemi
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4321eventno=1822source=NetBTphase=1 Simon Bembridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] The remote computer has ended the connection.

2006-10-17 Thread jpsalemi
Not sure if this will work or not. I seem to remember something like this a long time ago. It was a registry key: HKLM\System\CurrentcontrolSet\Control\Terminal Server\fDenyTSConnections and set it to 0

Re: [ActiveDir] GP for Remote users in Domain

2006-07-27 Thread jpsalemi
Hi WIlliam Computer Configuration/Windows Settings/Security Settings/Local Policies/Security Options/Interactive Logon:Number of previous logons to cache, setting that to 0 will turn off cached credientals. Hope that helps, John

Re: [ActiveDir] Group Policy question

2006-06-26 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Larry... http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/a834e844-8eb2-4ee2-927c-9989b4f55dd71033.mspx?mfr=true You can easily use the GPMC to delegete where they can link them, just click the OU, and the delegate tab. HTH, John

Re: [ActiveDir] Forcefully apply Group Policy

2006-06-06 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Murtaza... You can try computer configuration/administrative templates/windows components/system/group policy/registry policy processing. Checking the process even if group policy has not changed may help. Could cause some performance issues though, unless you have those machines seperated.

Re: [ActiveDir] Logged in user

2006-06-06 Thread jpsalemi
nbtstat - A ipaddress John Harding, Devon [EMAIL PROTECTED] NWINE.com

Re: [ActiveDir] FW: Assigning Software Via GPO

2006-06-02 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Christine, In a GPO you can set always install with elevated privileges to MSI's It is in both the user, and computer settings. You may want to set those. John Christine Allen

Re: [ActiveDir] Group Policy Query:

2006-05-31 Thread jpsalemi
Hi James... There are a couple articles warning against using Domain Local groups for policies. Can you try having them put in a global group in their own domain, and adding that directly to the read and apply section of the policy? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309172/en-us has some info.

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Christine.. You can use the restricted groups function to add say domain users to the power users group on the local machine. It's a little tricky as one function of it will replace any other members of the power users group, should there be any. As of XPSP2 though, you can do it additive,

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Peter... If the clients are SP2, you can use the bottom box, to use it additively. They finally fixed it. You use the bottom box, kinda backwards relative to the top...So, you would say for the group Domain Users, then that it is always a member of the local power users group. You can even

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Jef... I'm sure it works with 2003 also, was really a bug in XP that they had to fix, that the additive part just plain didn't work. I believe, but can't promise that 2000 SP4 works too. John Jef

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Yep...Absoultely right you don't have to browse, and you can't choose from there. Sorry for the confusion. What I have seen people do by mistake though, is to add Domain Users to the Domain group Remote Desktop Users instead of the local group, by not paying attention. It's a powerful piece of

Re: [ActiveDir] XP Slow Logon

2006-03-01 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Adeel, this setting: -Enabled Always wait for the network at computer startup and logon in the GPO Will slow down an XP box pretty good, they usually login cached and let things catch up with them. HTH, John

Re: [ActiveDir] Phantom Account Locks

2006-02-28 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Adam, Not sure if anyone has mentioned it or not, You'll see this often if someone has an RDP session open somewhere and changed his password elsewhere. Or if he was logged into another computer in another way when he changed it. Lots of times users disconnect instead of logging out. HTH,

RE: [ActiveDir] The system administrator has set policies to prev ent this installation

2006-02-22 Thread jpsalemi
There's a ton in goggle about this: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=The+system+administrator+has+set+policies+to+prevent+this+installationstart=0hl=enlr=lang_en; No one seems to know how, but it looks like the local policy, or registry. John

Re: [ActiveDir] MemberOf Query help

2006-02-21 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Bill... Unless I'm misunderstanding you, you shouldn't need to write a query at all, just give the group read and apply to the policy, and remove authenticated users. If you're trying to write a WMI filter for this purpose, I haven't had any luck at all trying to get that to work in this way.

Re: [ActiveDir] Slow Link Question

2006-02-21 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Noah.. I believe the 500 k is for group policy processing. Some parts of policies will not process if the client thinks it's a slow link. Although, this is not the most reliable thing in the world. There's a separate setting for offline files: Under Computer Configuration/Administrative

RE: [ActiveDir] ADUC updates - Was Expired Accounts

2006-01-13 Thread jpsalemi
Please make it easy to turn off drag and drop? Advanced option perhaps? Thanks, John List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] ADUC updates - Was Expired Accounts

2006-01-13 Thread jpsalemi
Policy setting even better, thought about it after I hit send. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] lcollins.com

Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Steve,... Looks like you have a loopback policy. That would be under computer configuration/administrative templates/system/Group Policy/User Group Policy loopback processing mode Hope this helps, John

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Steve... That's about the only way to apply user settings to computers, using the loopback. Not sure of your OU structure, if you had your users seperated, you could apply the actual user policies (loginscripts etc.) at the user OU level. As long as that was a different scope it would

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
Not to doubt your expertise Darren, but we use a worksation loopback here for the screen saver. Not my idea, but in our situation, it is easier to figure out machines that need to be exempt, rather than users. They could run a certain test for weeks on one pc, but on their administrative pc, the

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
Absolutely I'd love to know the answer also. I've seen this behavior for years, and just figured it was the nature of loopbacks, and having other policies in their scope. The case in point as I said before, is that if your users are in a different OU structure (scope) and you put say the login

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
Sorry, I did forget one thing though. We have had situations where a loginscript policy was misplaced, and in the scope of the loopback, it will cause the specified device is already in use error. Which does suspiciously sound like the login script ran twice, and does not dismount first. I know

Re: [ActiveDir] Dynamic client DNS registrations

2005-12-01 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Russ...We don't use dynamic update here, but you can see that it can be set to enabled. HTH, John Administrative Templates Network/DNS Client |---+-| | |

RE: [ActiveDir] Dynamic client DNS registrations

2005-12-01 Thread jpsalemi
There are some things like this one that you don't see in the GUI when you enable them. It applies to XP and 2003, not 2000 The explanation text in the policy specifies that. John Rimmerman, Russ

Re: [ActiveDir] OT? Remote Assistance.

2005-10-20 Thread jpsalemi
Not sure if you ever got this going? If not, do you have either of these policy settings set? computer configuratin/windows settings/security settings/local policies/user rights assignment/deny access to this computer from the network or access this computer from the network? For sure, the

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-10-03 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Bagus.. In the GPO, Computer Configuration, Windows Settings, Security Settings, File System, you can browse to the directory there, and assign rights. Probably to *.*, I don't remember what it needs to write to. You may even have to give full control to Domain Users. Not sure. But you can

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-09-30 Thread jpsalemi
Hello Bagus.. I believe Lotus Notes requires the user to have Modfiy rights to the Notes\Data directory. You can assign this with a GPO, if you wish. The sharing, I'm wondering if you have simple file sharing turned on? It's in explorer, tools, folder options, view, uncheck the box that says

RE: [ActiveDir] Working on policy for IE

2005-09-28 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Jeff... Might I suggest putting the sites you wish to be in the trusted sites on your Internet Options on your administrative machine, then open the policy, and tell it to import. It works fine here doing it that way. John

Re: [ActiveDir] Folder Redirection Offline Files

2005-09-28 Thread jpsalemi
Well, using offline files on desktops is really not worth the hassles..On laptops it's more than handy, on desktops, no real value we've found. So, you could just have a policy that does turn it off for desktops, if the machines they log into are desktops. But

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: TS Security Warning and GPO

2005-09-26 Thread jpsalemi
I would probably try user configuration/administrative templates/system/code signing for device drivers: Determines how the system responds when a user tries to install device driver files that are not digitally signed. This setting establishes the least secure response permitted on the

RE: [ActiveDir] Offline Files Question

2005-09-15 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Noah.. I have not tested with SP2, but the hotfix is part of SP2. I did test it on SP1 with the patch. The patch did not create the keys either. You need to do it manually. All of what they said I did find to work correctly with the additon of the reg keys. It still isn't close to being

RE: [ActiveDir] Security Group Policy Not Applying

2005-09-13 Thread jpsalemi
It sounds like a restricted groups policy being attempted wrong.But, from what I've seen, it won't even let you try that. John Sudhir Kaushal

Re: [ActiveDir] Offline Files Question

2005-09-09 Thread jpsalemi
You can work around it, not really an easy fix though. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811660 steve patrick [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Offline Files Question

2005-09-09 Thread jpsalemi
Well, that's why I said it' s not easy...You have to create the keys... If you have SP2, adding the keys should work. I never tested it with SP2, but did try it with the patch, pre-SP2. Of course they want everyone to install SP2, and someday soon, will not support anything less. John

RE: [ActiveDir] Account lockout

2005-08-02 Thread jpsalemi
Hi JakeNot sure if these have been mentioned or not? The one we see the most is when someone disconnects from an RDP session, rather than logs out, then changes their password. Next to that, persistent mapped drives, then scheduled tasks with the old password. John

Re: [ActiveDir] Policy that could effect accessing network share

2005-06-29 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Jeff... Up in the Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security settings\ Local Policies\User Rights Assignments There is both a Deny access to this computer from the network and an allow. You may want to look there. John

RE: [ActiveDir] Policy that could effect accessing network share

2005-06-29 Thread jpsalemi
In the Security Zones under Internet Explorer Maintanence under User Configuration. You can set the settings on your IE settings, and Import them. It will import All of your settings though. So, be sure of what you set there. John

RE: [ActiveDir] Policy that could effect accessing network share

2005-06-29 Thread jpsalemi
OpppsYes, that is a GPO John Cothern Jeff D. Team EITC [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] Browser toolbar customization

2005-06-07 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Fred... Try User Configuration/Administrative Templates/Windows Components/Internet Explorer/Toolbars/Configure toolbar buttons. You can choose what you wish to show there...I believe John Freddie

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO oddity

2005-05-31 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Russ... Enforced overrides Block Inheritance Enforced means run always and last really. You shouldn't even need the block. Should run last by default without the enforced. John Rimmerman, Russ

Re: [ActiveDir] Software restriction quandry

2005-05-31 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Jeff If i understand you right, I think I'd do a variation of #2... A seperate software restriction policy user basedThen a global group that has deny apply set on the delegation. That way you only manage the group. Remember too, these only apply to XP+, and you have to restart

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Newbie Help

2005-05-12 Thread jpsalemi
Hi... I 'm pretty sure you have to assign the SP to a machine, rather than a user. John Tabs The Cat [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] IE Settings not applying under Terminal Services

2005-04-28 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Justin.. I use merge when they get user settings from other policies, like login scripts, normal user settings...etc. If you want them to get these settings only when on a terminal server, you can use replace. Then these will be the only settings they get. John

RE: [ActiveDir] Policies:

2005-04-20 Thread jpsalemi
Hi James... A policy shouldn't affect a subnet only, unless it's a site policy. Unless Im misunderstanding you? Sounds more like private addressing actually. 169.245 ip range? At least to me. That would keep clients only accessing others on their perceived subnet. John

RE: [ActiveDir] Administrative rights

2005-04-20 Thread jpsalemi
Hi John.. I've seen some very odd behavior sometimes as you describe, where even as DA, and being in the local group, I've had to do a runas, and specify the local user, Administrator, to install something. Also, if it's an MSI, you can set it to always run at elevated privliges with policy,

Re: [ActiveDir] My Docs Home Folder Redirection

2005-04-14 Thread jpsalemi
Hey George.. Does the remote site have offline files turned on? John George Arezina [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Filtering for GPO's

2005-04-11 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Russ... Loopbacks have two modes, merge and replace...They basically make computers take user settings. So, the short answer is yes, you can reverse the setting on the OU, set the timeout to disabled...If you want them to get other user settings you have defined, then merge may be what

RE: [ActiveDir] raid failure

2005-04-11 Thread jpsalemi
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;269075 Looks like the ced means nothing really... John Kern, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] Filtering for GPO's

2005-04-08 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Jeff Probably the easiest way to do this, at least in my world. Is with seperate OU's and loopbacks. We faced a similar problem with laptops. We couldn't tell who a laptop user was, as they could log into a desktop anytime, but we wanted to apply settings to laptop users. So we have an

RE: [ActiveDir] Filtering for GPO's

2005-04-08 Thread jpsalemi
Absolutely... I personally just find OU's easier to manage than groups. Must be the graphical representation.. John Beelders, Ivor [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] SLOWWWWWW Logons

2005-04-08 Thread jpsalemi
I just have to ask... Are you using folder redirection on these accounts? Can the home drive be wronglike in oshkosh, and the user is in timbuktu? Any hints in event viewer? John Salandra, Justin

Re: [ActiveDir] event viewer access

2005-04-07 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Tom... In W2k3, you can set the rights... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;323076 On 2000, and 2003 there is a policy setting in the local user rights assingments manage auditing and security log Which can be set to a global group. However, you have to be careful

RE: [ActiveDir] event viewer access

2005-04-07 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Tom... The article says you have to enable these settings: Important: To view the group policy settings that are described in this article in the Group Policy editor, first complete the following steps,

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Blocking SP2 rollout

2005-03-15 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Mark.. This is a policy setting that you can set at the computer level I haven't had to do this for SP2, but I'm sure it calls an MSI, If you put a hash on that MSI, the machine shouldn't be able to run it. It's up in the security settings, and you have to create rules and disallow that

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Blocking SP2 rollout

2005-03-15 Thread jpsalemi
One more thing, explorer needs to be restarted, logout and in, or reboot, for it to take affect. John Abbiss, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Blocking SP2 rollout

2005-03-11 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Mark... You can just put a software restriction hash GPO on it, and disallow it until you want it. Then you can just remove it, when you wish. John [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO for standardizing the background/wallpaper

2005-02-08 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Joe.. If I remember correctly, you need to enable active desktop, and the active desktop wallpaper...But, put a bogus path to bogus file in there. I think it comes up with the default blue that way, but not sure if you can specify a different color. John

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO doesnt apply

2005-01-31 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Michel... Is MSN supposed to be MSN messenger? I dont think the policies are for that, but for Windows Messenger.Or maybe I'm just not reading this right. Not that it would make applying them any differently, but you might be able to just eliminate that policy, if that's the case. John

Re: [ActiveDir] AD startup scripts problem

2005-01-28 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Mark... I believe it's running at system level on startup, and i believe system has no network rights. John Mark Abbiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] How can a local user account be affected by a policy

2005-01-28 Thread jpsalemi
Sorry if I missed it, didn't see a reply to this? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q293655 John Cothern Jeff D. Team EITC

[ActiveDir] Drag and drop

2004-12-08 Thread jpsalemi
Hey allHope someone has the answer to this. We consistently have problems with some admin dragging and dropping an OU by mistake inside another, wreaking havoc with AD. Not to mention the errors etc. Politically, we have way too many admins, too much rights...etc. Slowly approaching that

RE: [ActiveDir] Drag and drop

2004-12-08 Thread jpsalemi
Thanks, we'll give it a try. John Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] t.us

Re: [ActiveDir] Offline Files

2004-11-30 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Noah.. That's a couple of the issues with offline files. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=811660 John Noah Eiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] IE settings

2004-11-22 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Rosen. It'll probably work if you use an XP machine for the administrative policy editing machine. Install GPMC on it, and edit the policy from there. Be aware though, some of those settings work differently at the domain level, than at an OU level. They decide they are the boss and if you

RE: [ActiveDir] OU and Policies

2004-11-15 Thread jpsalemi
Well, it depends... If you wish all your terminal servers to get the same policy, just put them all in one OU... Apply the policy there, and you're set. If you have multiple different policies to apply, you may need more OU's. Policies have a scope ...It's kind of like it has to be over the

RE: [ActiveDir] OU and Policies

2004-11-12 Thread jpsalemi
On terminal servers, loopbacks work well. Makes the user settings apply to the computer. John Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] OU and Policies

2004-11-12 Thread jpsalemi
Loopbacks can be set on either merge or replace. replace is probably what you need. John Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] OU and Policies

2004-11-12 Thread jpsalemi
No, you can have layers of user policies, and OU's, and change settings later, filter by groups etc. The problem with this approach is, once you set a setting, there's no way to get them back to not configured. If you enable something, later on you have to disable it. This is not desireable in

Re: [ActiveDir] Odd Issue after ADPREP

2004-11-09 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Justin, There's a script you need to run. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/windowsserv/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/dssbf_upwn_zscr.asp John

RE: [ActiveDir] Accept backupuser logon

2004-10-05 Thread jpsalemi
Don't they have to be in the remote desktop users group on the DC? John Douglas M. Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Accept backupuser logon

2004-10-05 Thread jpsalemi
Maybe you need to add builtin\backup operators to this one: Allow log on through Terminal Services: BUILTIN\administrators John Douglas M. Long

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Inheritance

2004-09-21 Thread jpsalemi
Yes, unless it's enforced Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] com

Re: [ActiveDir] Using CMD

2004-09-02 Thread jpsalemi
cd /d drive:path cd /d c:\path have fun, John Jacob Stabl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ActiveDir] printing GPO listing

2004-08-31 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Michael... Best thing to do is install the GPMC for free, and it's also a very good tool.. You can save reports as html's and print themeven export to excel after that, if you need to. hth, John

RE: [ActiveDir] Apply GP to computer account or user account?

2004-07-26 Thread jpsalemi
Well...you can It just has to be at a higher OU level, over both the user, and computer objects. John Jared Manhat

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO question concerning LOCAL GPO

2004-07-02 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Jeff...If you can get them to use cached credentials on the laptops, you can do a loopback policy. They'll cache it locally and get the settings even when off the wire. Not sure this fits your needsAnd it does make for some complaints, travellers doing presentations etc. John

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO - File and Printer Sharing.

2004-06-22 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Rick... You can turn off the server service, even with a GPO, but then no one gets there, not even admins...as far as i know. It's a bit awkwards...but, in computer configuration/windows settings/security settings/local policies/user rights assignments/deny access to this computer from

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO - File and Printer Sharing.

2004-06-22 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Rick.. I'm not positive on this...but, i think this key controls that... and you could write an adm file to do it. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Paramaters] AutoShareWks=dword:0001 Have fun, John |-+--

Re: [ActiveDir] User Icons

2004-06-21 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Debbie, take a look here http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;281923 |-+-- | | Ellis, Debbie| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | m | | |

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, GPO and Technet

2004-06-21 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Daniel I may be missing something here, but i don't think i've ever seen them work correctly from a drive letter? Even if i share something out from my local machine, for testing (like SP2), i always end up doing \\computer\drive$\share\file Might be something you want to try.

RE: [ActiveDir] Software Restriction Policy

2004-06-18 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Edwin... You can write the policy to only allow specified snap-ins You can then write an adm file for the enterprise manager (you'll need the guid for that) Then you can explicitly allow it. John |-+-- | | Lou Vega

RE: [ActiveDir] Quick Launch Bar

2004-06-17 Thread jpsalemi
Hey Edwin... If you don't roam it, it will still use the local one, not go away. From the way i understand it. This is from the GPO... Lets you add to the list of folders excluded from the user's roaming profile. This setting lets you exclude folders that are normally included in the

Re: [ActiveDir] Quick Launch Bar

2004-06-16 Thread jpsalemi
Hey EdwinWe haven't been using roaming profiles here, but what i can tell you is that the quick launch is in the Application Data directory. We experminted with redirecting it here so the quicklaunch would follow users around, but ran into many problems with it. Lots of slowness in

Re: [ActiveDir] spyware(OT)

2004-06-11 Thread jpsalemi
There was an interesting article the other day : http://searchwin2000.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid1_gci969259,00.html?track=NL-120ad=484520 Because of licensing issues we try to not let our users download adaware etc John |-+-- | |

RE: [ActiveDir] spyware(OT)

2004-06-11 Thread jpsalemi
You could probably put it into a gpo, might be a lot of work maintaining... Probably a login script, using vbs or something...You can set them to run silently in the GPO. I was looking at the reg.exe command, doesn't seem to be a silent switch on import. I'm sure one of the scripters would

Re: [ActiveDir] Wierdness with IE Proxy GPO settings

2004-06-09 Thread jpsalemi
Hi David... I've seen behavior like this myself. I've defined a software restriction policy at the domain level, for when we get a worm in house and i can get my hands on code. This is processed before the default domain policy, and we also have a modified domain policy at that level. At

RE: [ActiveDir] question on gpresult.exe

2004-06-09 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Daniel.. I'm wondering if you have some groups double-nested one is a member of the other, and the reverse also? We use group nesting a lot here, running a gpresult enumerates all groups, but i had no duplicates. John |-+-- | |

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Problem with Empty Temporary Internet Files option

2004-06-04 Thread jpsalemi
You might try under computer configuration/administrative templates/system/group policy registry policy processing process even if group policy objects have not changed Although you'll need to apply this at the computer object John |-+-- |

RE: [ActiveDir] adding PCs

2004-06-03 Thread jpsalemi
We removed it completely also.. |-+-- | | Free, Bob| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | Sent by: | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | |

RE: [ActiveDir] (OT?) Slow resume from computer Lock

2004-04-21 Thread jpsalemi
just for kicks you may want to check in an rsop.there is a setting under computer configuration/windows settings/security settings/local policies/security options --- Interactive logon: Require Domain Controller authentication to unlock workstation. could be turned on, and for some

Re: [ActiveDir] Domain clients hangs before logon, multiple issues

2004-04-01 Thread jpsalemi
you don't say, unless i missed it, if you're using dhcp? if so, and any kind of personal firewalls, could just not be getting an iptrying and trying...we've seen this with checkpoint. i would also guess that ipsec, or any kind of packet filtering would do the same, if not configured

Re: [ActiveDir] Internet Explorer Connection Proxy Settings GPO Issue

2004-03-26 Thread jpsalemi
i dont' think you're missing anything. i've seen this same behavior with a policy i had set for software restrictions at the domain level. it had blank proxy settings, and it was overriding the proxy settings i had set at the users level, and blanking out the proxy settings we had been

RE: [ActiveDir] Remote Desktop

2004-03-25 Thread jpsalemi
i have a question here: unless something has changed, domain admins should be populated in the local administrators group when you join the domain...so, by default they should have remote access rights. there are ways to block this with policy, and the most obvious one would be to use

RE: [ActiveDir] Remote Desktop

2004-03-25 Thread jpsalemi
well, at least on my xp box setting a gpo on my test ou computer configuration/administrative templates/windows components/terminal services/allow users to connect remotely using terminal services...setting this to enabled, checks the box, and greys it out imho, much better to

RE: [ActiveDir] Remote Desktop

2004-03-25 Thread jpsalemi
it must be the default xp templates...if you create the policy from an xp box, it should use them.. |-+-- | | Philadelphia, Lynden -| | | Revios Toronto| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| |