a.m.To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Link speed really has nothing to do with the decision to split into separate domains. You've got a LOT of control over replication and really can build a topology tha
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
I
(mostly) agree with Roger. You have a high degree of flexibility with
replication control. And with Windows 2003 forest functional level you get
LVR, which obviously helps to reduce the replication
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Link speed really has nothing to do with the decision to
split into separate domains. You've got a LOT of control over replication and
really can build a topology that works for just about any WAN desig
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
> but not
quite that “intimate” to all fit in a single domain ... slow links connect
global sites thus necessitating the split in the
domains
you'd need more arguments for us to be able to fol
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Right. Mostly for administrative and exchange consolidation. And to implement a logically consistent naming convention.
The domains are related enough to put into a single forest, but not quite that
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Haha good point, Phil :)
Thanks,
Jan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: Sun Sep 04 23:49:58 2005
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phil Renouf Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 9:47 PM To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org <mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Commissioning new servers shouldn't be a problem. My worry is consolidating the Exchange enviromnents during the domain migration.
The largest of the three domains spans 3 cities, each with a clus
D]
c - 312.731.3132
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Phil RenoufSent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 9:47 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Your best bet is going to
.
Thanks,
Brian
Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c -
312.731.3132
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Renouf
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005
9:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving
forest root domains to child domains in
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Thanks, Phil.
I thought so too. This is my method of last resort.
Actually, if it weren't for the exchange servers I would gladly do it this way.
I wish there was a better (and easier) way to do
Your best bet is going to be to create two new child domains in one of the forests and migrate all the objects from the other two domains. This is a pretty common domain restructuring task so there is a lot of information out there about how to do these kinds of migrations. You can use ADMT to do t
Title: Moving forest root domains to child domains in another forest
Hi! I have a huge task to do. I have three separate Windows Server 2003 forests, each with a single domain (and Exchange 2003 servers to boot). I have to combine all three into a single forest and end up with just one ro
13 matches
Mail list logo
