RE: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors

2003-10-08 Thread Cathy Hooper
at it! It's the way to go for GPO management! Cheers! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2-10-2003 16:40 Subject: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors Hello all, I am getting repeated secedit errors which seem to be due to a corrupted secedit.sdb file on the DCs

Re: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors

2003-10-03 Thread Jef Kazimer
r-Elia To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:54 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors Jef- I don't know if it helps but the flags (145) thing means the following: Machine Policy is being applied as opposed to user policy This policy is

[ActiveDir] Secedit Errors

2003-10-02 Thread jef . kazimer
Hello all, I am getting repeated secedit errors which seem to be due to a corrupted secedit.sdb file on the DCs. After using ESENTUTL to repair the DB, and group policy applies correctly. A day or so later, those that were repaired now have the same errors. Anyone have any idea where to halt

RE: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors

2003-10-02 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Title: Message Jef- I don't know if it helps but the flags (145) thing means the following: Machine Policy is being applied as opposed to user policy This policy is being applied as a background refresh (rather than foreground) No changes were detected to the GPO during this processing

RE: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors

2003-10-02 Thread John Reijnders
to go for GPO management! Cheers! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2-10-2003 16:40 Subject: [ActiveDir] Secedit Errors Hello all, I am getting repeated secedit errors which seem to be due to a corrupted secedit.sdb file on the DCs. After using