Title: Using non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Does anyone have experience or comments regarding the use of non-standard TLDs within a production AD forest?
E.g. x.nom
The name will be used within a production environment - a separate forest will exist for testing and QA.
2006 10:20
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Does
anyone have experience or comments regarding the use of non-standard TLDs
within a production AD forest?
E.g.
x.nom
The
name will be used within a production environment
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
JohnsonSent: 21 July 2006 09:56To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Ive always gone the
opposite way. I like the idea of using a completely non-standard TLD for my
forest root
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Johnson
Sent: 21 July 2006 09:56
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Ive always gone the opposite way. I
like the idea of using a completely non-standard TLD for my forest root so
:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Hi
Neil
Correct. The TLD is the
normally the last bit the in the string. So in the real world Internet examples
of TLDs are .com,.edu etc plus the country codes such as .za for
South
Africa which
July 2006 12:34
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Thanks again. We're on the same wave
length :)
I appreciate that .local can work but as
you state, it's best to avoid names that can become obsolete if the company
name
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006
12:34To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Using non-standard TLDs within Active
Directory
Thanks again. We're on the same wave length
:)
I appreciate that .local can work but as you state
, Sakari
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
JohnsonSent: 21. heinäkuuta 2006 12:30To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Hi
Neil
Correct. The TLD is the
normally the last bit
JohnsonSent: 21 July 2006 11:44To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Thats a really good
solution. So the forest root domain name would be nomura.nom and then there will
child domains below that?
From:
[EMAIL PROTE
] On Behalf Of Sakari Kouti
Sent: 21 July 2006 12:47
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Hi Neil and Peter,
If two companies both happen to choose
corp.local for their forest name, they cannot create forest trusts, if the need
later
of the DNS
name
Jorge
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sakari
KoutiSent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:47To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Hi Neil and Peter,
If two companies
PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 July 2006 13:07
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
It will be something .nom,
where something is to be determined.
Whether children or additional trees, is
also to be determined
Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Sent: 21 July 2006 13:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
I guess CORP.MICROSOFT.COM would still
be an issue when trying to create a trust when the other company has
CORP.SOMETHING.ELSE
Reason
RE: [ActiveDir] Using non-standard
TLDs within Active Directory
for the LOCAL tld, you need
be aware that it can cause issues with MAC computers
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/836413/en-us
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107800
Jorge
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
JohnsonSent: Friday, July 21, 2006 13:44To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Hi Jorge. Is the
issue related to NetBios names or DNS names? i.e
ubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Hi Neil and Peter,
If two companies both happen to choose corp.local for their
forest name, they cannot create forest trusts, if the need later arises. Of
course, if one of them is a chemical company in the west coast and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
JohnsonSent: 21 July 2006 09:56To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
Ive always gone the
opposite way. I like the idea of using
Also a good idea.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 July 2006 14:05
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
For this and other reason I like to use
, Jorge de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/21/2006 06:43 AM
Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
ToActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
cc
SubjectRE: [ActiveDir] Using non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
for the LOCAL tld, you need be aware that it can cause
On 21/07/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proposal here is to use .nom and the company name is Nomura.
Which is all fine and dandy until the French get envious of the .name
TLD and decide they're going to have their own equivalent...
--
AdamT
A casual stroll through the
as to avoid future
issues.
I appreciate all the feedback :)
neil
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 21 July 2006 13:30To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Using
non-standard TLDs within Active Directory
neil,
In a re-design we
21 matches
Mail list logo
