ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] dns
zone
you mean set up auditing on the ntfs file the zone is saved to?
also, under dynamic updates, it says "secure and non-secure".
how is it secure on a standard zone?
thanks a lot!
On 9/7/05, Brian
Desmond [EMAIL
if a zone is just a standard primary, is there any security or acl's you can set in windows or any auditing?
thanks
07,
2005 9:12 PM
To: activedirectory
Subject: [ActiveDir] dns zone
if a zone is just a standard primary, is there any security or acl's
you can set in windows or any auditing?
thanks
guess you could audit the dns zone files.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 9:12 PMTo: activedirectory
Subject: [ActiveDir] dns zone
if a zone is just
: Wednesday, September 07,
2005 9:29 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] dns zone
you mean set up auditing on the ntfs file the zone is saved to?
also, under dynamic updates, it says secure and non-secure.
how is it secure on a standard zone
Greetings,
Is any one using this new feature in Windows server 2003 where DNS zones can be
stored in the domain or application directory partitions of Active Directory? I
found this on Microsoft TechNet site that states that A partition is a data
structure within Active Directory used to
: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:01 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS zone replication in Active Directory
Greetings,
Is any one using this new feature in Windows server 2003 where DNS zones
can be stored in the domain or application directory partitions of
Active Directory? I
WebLog - www.msmvps.com/willhack4food
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:01 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS zone replication in Active Directory
Greetings,
Is any one
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Daniel L.
Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March
14, 2004 1:16 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS - zone delegation questions
Santhosh
,
Santhosh
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:15
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS -
zone delegation questions
Yes, you are doing it correctly.
Reverse DNS is a bit trickier
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS -
zone delegation questions
Yes, you are doing it correctly.
Reverse DNS is a bit trickier, especially
if you're not breaking IP blocks at non-classful boundaries (ie not Class C's
or Class B's). For the most part, however, you're going
: Santhosh
Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March
15, 2004 9:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS - zone delegation questions
Roger,
Unfortunately, I have
to make a commentabout the "Mastering DNS on Windows 2003" book
(ISBN:
:
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS - zone delegation questions
Yes. You are
right. Reverse DNS is a bit trickier. But it is not possible to
perform Dynamic updates on Classes Reverse Lookup
zones.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Roger
Title: Message
Yes. I was talking about the Classless
Reverse Lookup Zones. Sorry about the confusion!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:01
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS -
zone
t: [ActiveDir] DNS - zone
delegation questions
To All:
I apologize for the length of the question but,...
I am looking for a good reference/how-to on delegating DNS
zones in Windows 2003. My real purpose, I am hoping to learn this
subject, rather than just getting the answer.
To All:
I apologize for the length of the question but,...
I am looking for a good reference/how-to on delegating DNS
zones in Windows 2003. My real purpose, I am hoping to learn this subject,
rather than just getting the answer. But any help will be appreciated.
I have looked in
for the
delegated domain.
HTH,
-Tim
-Original Message- From: Daniel L.
Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 3/13/2004
8:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS - zone delegation
questions
To All:
I apologize for the length of the
question
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Migration
Thanks for the response. But I am trying to understand the
advantage of
doing a zone migration using backup and restore method
compared to doing a
Secondary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Migration
Hi all,
Ineed helpto finalize a DNS design. Here is the scenario.
NT 4.0 PDC is holding a DNS zone called Mydomain.com.
Unfortunately, I have
to use
Hi all,
I need help to finalize a DNS design. Here is the scenario.
NT 4.0 PDC is holding a DNS zone called Mydomain.com. Unfortunately, I have
to use the same Mydomain.com for Windows 2003 AD domain. It is a parallel
migration. What is the best way to migrate Mydomain.com to new Windows
We are seeing reports that for the following attribute.
The DNS zone becomes available for scavenging at:
1/7/1601
Obviously 1601 is way to much in the past to start a scavenging process.
Does anyone know what might cause it to be reported this way. The Date and
Time on the Server are up to
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:24 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Scavaging information
We are seeing reports that for the following attribute.
The DNS zone becomes available for scavenging at:
1/7/1601
Obviously 1601 is way to much
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Zone Scavaging information
Time values in AD
Oops...forgot to change my subject line...
Can I get some feedback on the following scenario?
1 root domain controller running w2k, dns, dhcp
2 newly created child domain servers
For the sake of consistency is it necessary to have AD-Integrated zones
installed on all DC's or should I place
24 matches
Mail list logo
