RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread knighTslayer
] On Behalf Of joeSent: 08 July 2004 23:05To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest First off, you may want to look into what you can do with that SAP app in the future, your hands are bound in a bad way and at some point you will find yourself between a rock

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread joe
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest Hi Joe, Thanks for your detailed email. I want the SAP domain to have a separate security policy than the users domain. So I think I am going to go down to the two tree domain road. So within my forest I have two tree

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread knighTslayer
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 09 July 2004 13:20To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest Define what you mean by want the SAP domain to have a separate security policy than the users domain. Using multiple trees in asingleforest will not buy you anything

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread Rachui, Scott
Of knighTslayerSent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:01 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest I guessed I got confused then! As I understand it I don't want SAP to be a child of users as I don't want it to inherit any domain security polices like password

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread knighTslayer
:01To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest I guessed I got confused then! As I understand it I don't want SAP to be a child of users as I don't want it to inherit any domain security polices like password expiration etc. I get what you are saying

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread knighTslayer
with practice! thanks guys. Ad From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachui, ScottSent: 09 July 2004 14:21To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest A child domain won't inherit the parent domain's password policy. In fact, different

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
great book - but the first edition doesn't mention the security boundary topic.) /Guido From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of knighTslayerSent: Freitag, 9. Juli 2004 15:29To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest ah, okay. I have just bought a b

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread joe
PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest Joe, Each NT4.0 domain I have has two domain controllers, a BDC and of 'course a PDC. When I upgrade the users domain PDC to ADS then that will be pretty straight forward. When I upgrade the last BDC and switch to native mode

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-09 Thread joe
eddition of this really great book - but the first edition doesn't mention the security boundary topic.) /Guido From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of knighTslayerSent: Freitag, 9. Juli 2004 15:29To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a F

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread Henderson Richard
I would start fresh with a new forest then migrate over users services using MS migration tools which work well. I have previously done an in place upgradeofNT4 although it workedwell there is more flexibility with with a new domain. Obviously the additional hardware requirements can

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread knighTslayer
sorry, new kit is out of the question, I should have mentioned that. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henderson RichardSent: 08 July 2004 11:47To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest I would start fresh with a new forest

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest sorry, new kit is out of the question, I should have mentioned that. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henderson RichardSent: 08 July 2004 11:47To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest I

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread Justin_Leney
Return Receipt Your document: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest was received by: Justin Leney/US/DCI at: 07/08/2004 09:48:33 AM

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread Adams, Kenneth W \(Ken\)
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of knighTslayerSent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:29 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest Hi Kenneth, I'm currently replicating the situation now using VMware. So, if I have this right

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread joe
First off, you may want to look into what you can do with that SAP app in the future, your hands are bound in a bad way and at some point you will find yourself between a rock and hard place for something due to it. If you guys wrote the SAP app, work on making it more flexible, if someone

RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest

2004-07-08 Thread joe
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henderson RichardSent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:47 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2 NT4.0 domains to a Forrest I would start fresh with a new forest then migrate over users services using MS migration tools which work well. I have previously