Two things.
I've not noticed a limit to the number of zones, but I've also only tried
about 100 (but that was in production, so take that for whatever its worth).
Second - manually entered records don't get scavenged, only those which are
dynamically registered. Therefore, you should be able to
I've got 809 zones in production, right now. Standard primaries tho (not
A/D integrated).
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit
Two things
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 6:01 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit
Two things.
I've not noticed a limit to the number of zones, but I've also only tried
about 100 (but that was in production, so take
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit
I've got 809 zones in production, right now. Standard primaries tho (not
A/D integrated).
-Original
Kazimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit, and
Searching for Static Records
Roger,
Thanks for the Reply!
Well I can say it can handle well over a 100. :) I'm just
second
is appalling.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Jef Kazimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit
Michael,
Sheez...The Zone Transfers alone must be mind boggling :)
Do you see any performance hits
/info/suptools/topics/dnscmd_ageallrecords.htm1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit, and Searching for Static
