RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit, and Searching for Static Records

2003-11-26 Thread Jef Kazimer
Roger, Thanks for the Reply! Well I can say it can handle well over a 100. :) I'm just second guessing this strategy, but unfortunately it's the only way I can think of cleaning up records. A problem was, that with the Class B zones, I needed to AgeAll records to clean up the thousands of

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit, and Searching for Static Records

2003-11-26 Thread Roger Seielstad
I wasn't aware that staticly entered records could be scavenged - wouldn't that defeat the purpose of it being static? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Jef

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS, Reverse and Limit, and Searching for Static Records

2003-11-26 Thread Jef Kazimer
They can't be, unless you use the /AgeAll in DNSCMD. It adds a timestamp to ALL records within that zone.This makes them ready for scavenging (if the zone and server have it on). Since scavenging was not on originally, the PTR records have no timestamps. Even so, the zones had it off, so I