RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Error on Domain Controller

2006-11-10 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
That indicates that something is preventing Admi. Template policy from running. Posting the relevants part of userenv.log would be helpful. Darren -Original Message- From: Paul G. DaSilva [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: 11/10/2006 10:43 AM Subject: [ActiveDir]

Re: [ActiveDir] gpo and script

2006-06-16 Thread Myke
the gpmc.chm file in the %programfiles%\gpmc\scripts folder. Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2006 9:38 a.m. To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] gpo and script Hi Myke Yes

RE: [ActiveDir] gpo and script

2006-06-16 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
] On Behalf Of Myke Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:57 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] gpo and script hi Tony, I wanna design some scripts, for Windows 2000, with the same functions as GPMC script's have. The problems is: I wanna write generic scripts, to windows 2k and 2k3

RE: [ActiveDir] gpo and script

2006-06-14 Thread Tony Murray
Hi Myke Yes it is possible. Have a look at the sample scripts that come with the Group Policy Management Console (GPMC). http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=0a6d4c24-8cbd-4 b35-9272-dd3cbfc81887DisplayLang=en Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] gpo and script

2006-06-14 Thread Tony Murray
file in the %programfiles%\gpmc\scripts folder. Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2006 9:38 a.m. To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] gpo and script Hi Myke Yes it is possible

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Russ- The right answer with Software Installation is pretty much to always use DFS. That way if the package ever has to physically move off of a server, the path doesn't have to change. Path changes aren't supported in GPSI without a re-install. So,to answer your question, yes, I would use DFS to

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:33 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit Russ- The right answer with Software Installation is pretty much to always use DFS. That way if the package ever has to physically move off

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 2:50 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit Are you saying that if I deployed an MSI to a bunch of users from

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO deployment limit

2006-06-09 Thread Brian Desmond
What you need to do is get your file servers at strategic points on your WAN (hub, edges, etc) setup and use DFSR to replicate the MSI. Then you can deploy the MSI from the DFS path and your clients will use the local copy. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Screen Saver

2006-06-06 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Title: GPO Screen Saver Hey Christine- You might want to check and see if something has changed on the filtering of that GPO. If its linked to the domain then I would guess it would be applying to all users in the domain, even if they are logged onto a TS (unless you are using loopback in

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Screen Saver

2006-06-06 Thread Christine Allen
r-EliaSent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:09 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Screen Saver Hey Christine- You might want to check and see if something has changed on the filtering of that GPO. If its linked to the domain then I would guess it would be applying to

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Screen Saver

2006-06-06 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
day, June 06, 2006 8:30 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Screen Saver It is linked to the Domain and has been in place for about 2 years. I does filter down to our servers, which I liked. What's weird is this just started happening and I'm not sure what ch

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO wierdness during forest migration

2006-05-17 Thread Nicolas Blank
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 May 2006 03:17 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO wierdness during forest migration Nicolas- I hope things are well in SA. So, one possible issue here could be in how the machines have been moved between forests. Were they re-imaged

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-17 Thread Robert Rutherford
] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: 16 May 2006 16:27 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment So, I suspect what is happening here, based on that error, is the popup you're seeing is Windows Installer trying to repair the application but not finding

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-16 Thread Robert Rutherford
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 May 2006 23:43 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment Rob Do you have access to the original MSI (it could be repackaged as an EXE)? msiexec

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-16 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert RutherfordSent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:26 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment Hi Guys, Thanks for the input but still no joy nothing is showing in the logs and I dont have

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-16 Thread Jonathon . Austin
Good assessment. When you have the machines cleaned up, Adobe supplies a deployment preparation tool for this exact purpose. You will have to do a bit of Googling for it. NEVER edit or repackage an existing MSI (not possible in every case). Always create a transform which can be applied against

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-15 Thread Robert Rutherford
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment Robert- If Installer is really doing something, it should generate an MSI*.log file in %temp% (or in %windir\%temp% for per machine installs). I would look in there for a recent one that shows what's going

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-15 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment Hi Darren, Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately there are no logs being dumped at all. The Windows intstaller screen literally just flashes for a second and then vanishes, more or less each time they open a new window or app

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-15 Thread Jonathon . Austin
Rob Do you have access to the original MSI (it could be repackaged as an EXE)? msiexec /i file.msi /L*vx c:\path\to\logfile.txt That will dump out as much possible info about what is happening. If you need help debugging the output, let me know. Cheers Jon Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO wierdness during forest migration

2006-05-15 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Nicolas- I hope things are well in SA. So, one possible issue here could be in how the machines have been moved between forests. Were they re-imaged or just moved between domains? If the latter, then what you could be experiencing is some crap (technical term) in the registry from the old domain

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-11 Thread Riley, Devin
Thanks, Darren. Good information. Devin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-EliaSent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:09 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO This is primarily because GP will only refresh if the GPO has

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Christine.. You can use the restricted groups function to add say domain users to the power users group on the local machine. It's a little tricky as one function of it will replace any other members of the power users group, should there be any. As of XPSP2 though, you can do it additive,

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Peter Johnson
: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Hi Christine.. You can use the restricted groups function to add say domain users to the power users group on the local machine. It's a little tricky as one function of it will replace any other members of the power users group, should there be any. As of XPSP2 though, you

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Subject 05/10/2006 08:39 RE: [ActiveDir] GPO AM

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Software Deployment

2006-05-10 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Robert- If Installer is really doing something, it should generate an MSI*.log file in %temp% (or in %windir\%temp% for per machine installs). I would look in there for a recent one that shows what's going on. Darren From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Jef Kazimer
John, Just curious, was these option *ONLY* availiable in XP SP2? Any hope it exists in Windows Server 2003 SP1? :) Thanks, Jef From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:49:21 -0500 HiPeter... IftheclientsareSP2

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
ail.activedir.org cc Subject 05/10/2006 09:52 RE: [ActiveDir] GPO AM

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
] GPO John, Just curious, was these option *ONLY* availiable in XP SP2? Any hope it exists in Windows Server 2003 SP1? :) Thanks, Jef From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:49:21 -0500 HiPeter... IftheclientsareSP2

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Christine Allen
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:58 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Hi Jef... I'm sure it works with 2003 also, was really a bug in XP that they had to fix, that the additive part just plain didn't

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Hi, Is there a special security template I need to add because I can pick any local groups like power users. -Christine Christine N. Allen Systems Engineer BMC HealthNet Plan 2 Copley Place Boston, MA 02116 617-748-6034 617-293-4407 [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Riley, Devin
8:02 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Yes. Here's the KB article referencing the fix (works for Win2K as well): http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810076/en-us From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef KazimerSent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread jpsalemi
Subject RE: [ActiveDir] GPO 05/10/2006 11:05 AM

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

2006-05-10 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
, May 10, 2006 9:47 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO In my experience, this now works but there is still one issue. In my testing, groups that you add to the local group can be removed by a local admin and group policy does not replace them. As a result, I use

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO console version 1/2003 Admin tools.

2006-04-13 Thread Olivarez, Sergio J Mr CTNOSC/GD-NS
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO console version 1/2003 Admin tools. Christine- Default behavior whenever you edit a GPO is that GP Editor will check the version of the ADM files that exist in c:\windows\inf on the workstations where you're editing the GPO, and, if newer

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO question

2006-04-07 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Johnny- The problem with using Folder Redirection policy in the first place is that its all about moving files around. So, if you were to do something to change it when users log onto a Citrix box, you'll have files copying back and forth every time they move from one scope to another. You might

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO question

2006-04-07 Thread Mathieu CHATEAU
Hello Johnny, you can use the loopback in replace mode which should do the trick (then a user gpo should be in the OU, even if empty) Friday, April 7, 2006, 5:38:20 PM, you wrote: FJ We have a GPO in place for all users to do Folder Redirection of My FJ Documents. We are experiencing

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Mark Parris
Have you removed Authenticated users from the GPO? -Original Message- From: Joe Lagreca [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:08:10 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working I am trying to implement GPO Security Filtering to

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Joe- Are you removing the Authenticated Users ACE before you add the discretionary group? You don't have any Deny ACEs on that GPO, do you? Darren -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Lagreca Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 10:08 AM To:

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Joe Lagreca
Yes, I did remove Authenticated users, or else the GPO would apply to everyone in the domain, rather than just the group I am trying to apply it to. On 2/23/06, Mark Parris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you removed Authenticated users from the GPO? -Original Message- From: Joe Lagreca

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Joe Lagreca
Authenticated users was removed from the GPO. I have deny apply group policy only for all the admin groups, so I don't accidentally appy the GPO to any of them. The group I am trying to apply the GPO to, is not part of any other group. Joe On 2/23/06, Darren Mar-Elia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Lagreca Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 12:55 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working Authenticated users was removed from the GPO. I have

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Mark Parris
Not unless you applied it at the root. Only members of the OU. -Original Message- From: Joe Lagreca [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:54:44 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working Yes, I did remove Authenticated

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Mark Parris
I would now utilise the gpo modelling aspect of the gpmc to see where my issues lay. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris Sent: 23 February 2006 21:34 To: ActiveDir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working

2006-02-23 Thread Joe Lagreca
Of Joe Lagreca Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 12:55 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Security Filtering to a group not working Authenticated users was removed from the GPO. I have deny apply group policy only for all the admin groups, so I don't

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO problem - Network card disappearing

2006-01-12 Thread jkleyheeg
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO problem - Network card disappearing We had this issue occur with systems also. Turned up to be an issue with the firewall configuration on the PCs. This configuration problem was created by group policy, which was limiting the services

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO problem - Network card disappearing

2006-01-11 Thread Joseph B. Luptak
We had this issue occur with systems also. Turned up to be an issue with the firewall configuration on the PCs. This configuration problem was created by group policy, which was limiting the services which created a problem with SP2 for XP which used different services then XP SP1. Not

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO refresh interval

2006-01-10 Thread Matheesha Weerasinghe
ach policy applicable to each individual GPO or is the net result value from LSDOU used? Thanks M@ Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO refresh intervalDate: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:55:43 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Not sure I understand the question. Each system wil

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO refresh interval

2006-01-10 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO refresh interval Sorry I should have been more specific. The "group policy refresh interval for computers" setting in the Computer Configuration/Administrative Templates/System/Group Policy if configured at LSDOU levels for a computer or user, how

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO refresh interval

2006-01-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Not sure I understand the question. Each system will apply GP at an interval dependent upon its role. For DCs its every 5 minutes. For member servers and workstations its every 90 min plus a +-30 minute randomizer. For a given system, the next processing interval is determined when

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-11 Thread Steve Rochford
e the perl code :-) joeware.netfine now - I'd guess it was just one of those things that make life such fun! Steve From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 10 October 2005 15:37To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-11 Thread joe
joeware.netfine now - I'd guess it was just one of those things that make life such fun! Like DNS. ;o) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve RochfordSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:54 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-10 Thread Steve Rochford
datediff("s",now,sTime) 0 wscript.sleep 6 loop oShell.run sCmdend if From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: 08 October 2005 04:21To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Now that I hav

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-10 Thread Steve Rochford
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, DevonSent: 07 October 2005 21:46To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs How would I use schtask to assign to more than one computer. It seems like that may be our only option. I cant believe its

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-10 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kamlesh ParmarSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:58 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Interactive doesn't help in LOCALSYSTEM context for GUI apps, only CMD.EXE canpop

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-08 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harding, DevonSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 4:46 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs How would I use schtask to assign to more than one computer. It seems like that may be our only option. I can't believe its

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-08 Thread joe
ity. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh ParmarSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:58 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Interactive doesn't help in LOCALSYSTEM context for GUI apps, only CMD.E

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs What is your OS? Is it a user specific task or a computer based task? If it is a task scheduled to run after the user logs on I'm sure it is permissions, or lack there of. Tim Vander Kooi Microsoft Systems

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Harding, Devon
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs I can't visualize why it shouldn't work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:14 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread joe
Error messages? Do you get anything? Do you know for sure the script is running? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, DevonSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:28 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Well

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Harding, Devon
] GPO Permissions with .vbs Error messages? Do you get anything? Do you know for sure the script is running? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:28 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Alain Lissoir
Is it running interactively first? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 8:08 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Error messages? Do you get anything? Do you know for sure

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Rich Milburn
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:00 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs At.exe will always reqire admin rights, but normal user account can always

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread joe
it as a startup script? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, DevonSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:28 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs If I put this in the Logon Scripts, it runs but just for local

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Rich Milburn
--- I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:28 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Harding, Devon
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs I tested several scenarios: 1) batch file in startup script in GPO with non-privileged user logging on job appeared in AT. 2) Your script in startup script in GPO with non-privileged user logging on job appeared in AT. 3) Your

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Harding, Devon
) -Devon From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:11 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs I tested several scenarios: 1) batch file in startup script in GPO with non

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
nt: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:00 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs At.exe will always reqire admin rights, but normal user account can always schedule task using, Task Scheduler.. So use command line utility schtasks.exe, it should

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs What is your OS? Is it a user specific task or a computer based task? If it is a task scheduled to run after the user logs on I'm sure it is permissions, or lack there of. Tim Vander Kooi Microsoft Systems Administrator Explorer Pipeline From

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Harding, Devon
Of Kamlesh Parmar Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:45 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs This is specific to opening the internet explorer with higher privileges... (nothing to do with script runing at logon or startup) If I knew

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread joe
] On Behalf Of Kamlesh ParmarSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 2:45 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs This is specific to opening the internet explorer with higher privileges... (nothing to do with script runing at logon or startup)If I knew

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread Brian Desmond
a compelling reason to learn C# or VB.Net to me. ;) Thanks,Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:02 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-07 Thread joe
_vbscript_, that might be fun for people who don't do perl. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian DesmondSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:15 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs This should be a piece

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-06 Thread Harding, Devon
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs What is your OS? Is it a user specific task or a computer based task? If it is a task scheduled to run after the user logs on I'm sure it is permissions, or lack there of. Tim Vander Kooi Microsoft Systems

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-06 Thread Rich Milburn
not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:48 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs The problem

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-06 Thread Harding, Devon
Itll only schedule tasks on logon scripts, not startup. Someone correct me if Im wrong. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:41 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-06 Thread Derek Harris
PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Itll only schedule tasks on logon scripts, not startup. Someone correct me if Im wrong. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich MilburnSent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:41

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs

2005-10-06 Thread joe
I can't visualize why it shouldn't work. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, DevonSent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:14 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Permissions with .vbs Itll only schedule tasks on logon scripts

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-10-03 Thread jpsalemi
Subject Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems 10/02/2005 08:50 PM

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-10-03 Thread Bagus Laksono
] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems Hi Bagus.. In the GPO, Computer Configuration, Windows Settings, Security Settings, File System, you can browse to the directory there, and assign rights. Probably to *.*, I don't

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-10-02 Thread Bagus Laksono
.. Thank you, Regards BaGus - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems Hello Bagus.. I believe Lotus Notes requires the user to have Modfiy rights to the Notes\Data

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO problems

2005-09-30 Thread jpsalemi
Hello Bagus.. I believe Lotus Notes requires the user to have Modfiy rights to the Notes\Data directory. You can assign this with a GPO, if you wish. The sharing, I'm wondering if you have simple file sharing turned on? It's in explorer, tools, folder options, view, uncheck the box that says

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-28 Thread Mark . H . Lunsford
to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ? Yeah we need a good search mechanism for this list, this was discussed nearly to death last year or the year before when that functionality change

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO filtering by properties of User Object

2005-09-27 Thread Coleman, Hunter
I think the way I'd approach it is to build a script that checks users for roaming profiles, and puts them in a security group if they do. Schedule the script to run on a regular basis. Then use the security group for GPO filtering. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO filtering by properties of User Object

2005-09-27 Thread nelson yong
Thanks for the input. Will try that. Rgds Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27/09/2005 09:56 PM Please respond to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org To ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org cc Subject RE: [ActiveDir] GPO filtering by properties of User Object

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-26 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Worked like a charm! You have the possibility to use Member option and/or memberof option Using the member option you ENFORCE (or replace) which objects (users/groups) are a member of a group. If you add an object as a member of the group and it is not on the restricted groups list, it

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-26 Thread joe
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ? Worked like a charm! You have the possibility to use Member option and/or memberof option Using the member option you ENFORCE (or replace) which objects (users/groups) are a member of a group. If you

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-24 Thread Roger Seielstad
, September 23, 2005 2:42 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ? But then it defeats the purpose of restricted group, as you want to be sure that, only known members are part of the restricted group. If the operation is merge than

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-24 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
is then oout. Roger Seielstad E-mail Geek From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:42 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-24 Thread Roger Seielstad
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 2:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ? I agree it would be better to give that option of append

Re: [ActiveDir] GPO Restricted Groups gotchas ?

2005-09-23 Thread Kamlesh Parmar
But then it defeats the purpose of restricted group, as you want to be sure that, only known members are part of the restricted group. If the operation is merge than it is not restrictedby definition? When u ask for merge or append, you are doing some group membership modification.You better use

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-26 Thread Cothern Jeff D. Team EITC
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crawford, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:03 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro Here is such a script. Just unrem the correct strOS line that you're working with and set strSource and strDestination to the correct

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-26 Thread deji
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crawford, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:03 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro Here is such a script. Just unrem the correct strOS line that you're working with and set strSource

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-25 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP & 2000 Pro Actually my point was less around the initial organization of AD than around changing an AD design to accomodate short-term requirements. I am all for the approach you've described below if it meets the administrative and business n

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-25 Thread Crawford, Scott
, 2005 5:19 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro I'd create the Workstations OU and the Servers OU. Then write a script that looks at each of the machines in the computers container, and based on what you find in the operatingSystem attribute have

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-25 Thread Robert Bobel
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro Most of what Ive seen is that they first organize by Geo then by organizationally (or the other way round) then further divide the objects by roles like Mobile users, Desktops, service accounts, de-provisioned users etc. I cant image organizing

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-24 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
WMI filters aren't processed by Win2K so that won't work on that platform. Your best bet is probably to put all the XP win2k machines in one security group and then security filter the GPO based on that group (i.e. remove the Authenticated Users ACE from the sec. filter on that GPO and add the

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-24 Thread Ken Cornetet
WMI filters don't work for windows 2000 (server or professional). Create separate Ous for your servers and for your workstations. Link your GP to the workstation OU. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Wednesday, August

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-24 Thread Tony Murray
Is there any reason why you can't put the workstations and servers in separate OUs and then link the GPO to the OU that contains the workstations? If this is not possible then you might consider group filtering, i.e. put all servers in a group and exclude them from the policy. Tony

RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP 2000 Pro

2005-08-24 Thread Harding, Devon
I have over 2000 machines in my computers containers. Is there any other way? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:53 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO on XP

  1   2   3   4   5   >