RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-17 Thread Alexander Suhovey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clay, Justin (ITS) Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:42 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy Alexander, I have to agree that in all

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
Thanks Sergio, that will help a bunch! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivarez, Sergio J Mr ANOSC/FCBS Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:54 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
It very well might, thanks Susan! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:04 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Alexander Suhovey
I wonder if this approach would work in modern hostile environment where patches just keep coming. Don't you think that locking down workstation(s) in this way will put a great deal of additional work to the change management process? In case you don't have one you'll really need it. You see,

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy I wonder if this approach would work in modern hostile environment where patches just keep coming. Don't you think that locking down workstation(s) in this way will put a great deal of additional work to the change management process? In case you don't

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Alexander Suhovey
I wonder if this approach would actually work for today's situation where patches just keep coming. Don't you think that locking down workstation(s) in this way will put a great deal of additional work to the change management process? In case you don't have one you'll really need it. You see,

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
] On Behalf Of Alexander Suhovey Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:02 PM To: Alexander Suhovey Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy I wonder if this approach would work in modern hostile environment where patches just keep coming. Don't you think that locking down workstation(s

Re: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-14 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:02 PM To: Alexander Suhovey Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy I wonder if this approach would work in modern hostile environment where patches just keep coming. Don't you think that locking down workstation(s) in this way will put

RE: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-13 Thread Olivarez, Sergio J Mr ANOSC/FCBS
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/rstrplcy.mspx Thanks... ... ... ... Sergio J. Olivarez - Contractor GD-NS From: Clay, Justin (ITS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:27 PM To: activedir@mail.activedir.org

Re: [ActiveDir] Hash-based Software Restriction Policy

2006-02-13 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
NIST Scientific and Technical Databases - National Software Reference Library: http://www.nist.gov/srd/nistsd28.htm I know in forensics they get the hash sets from NIST for grep'ing purposes. Would that help? Clay, Justin (ITS) wrote: Hey All, I was curious if any of you have set up