RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Copy Outgoing Messages

2007-01-03 Thread Aaron Steele
Dan, I did some quick searching and found a white-paper from MS on Outbound Journaling and how one might set that up. That might be your best course for further research. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=d357e733-0e22-477c-b884-0c38fbb51533displaylang=en /aaron From:

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Copy Outgoing Messages

2007-01-03 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Inbound is a piece of cake. Outbound needs journaling http://support.microsoft.com/?id=281926 (not sure if 2007 makes this easier?) Aaron Steele wrote: Dan, I did some quick searching and found a white-paper from MS on Outbound Journaling and how one might set that up. That might be

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Copy Outgoing Messages

2007-01-03 Thread Wells, James Arthur
@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Copy Outgoing Messages Inbound is a piece of cake. Outbound needs journaling http://support.microsoft.com/?id=281926 (not sure if 2007 makes this easier?) Aaron Steele wrote: Dan, I did some quick searching and found a white-paper from MS

Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Exchange 2003 IMF v2 configuration

2006-11-02 Thread Bart Van den Wyngaert
It is always possible to perform the transitioning, but as it is a very small customer... You can guess I have to talk to them about it. On 10/31/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup IMF no can do with the POP connector... it picks up the messages and

Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Exchange 2003 IMF v2 configuration

2006-10-31 Thread Bart Van den Wyngaert
That's the answer indeed, I'm using the POP3 connector... Thanks Susan! On 10/31/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First off are you using SMTP? And not the Pop connector? Check out this article: http://www.vladville.com/articles/exchangesp2imf.asp

Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Exchange 2003 IMF v2 configuration

2006-10-31 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Yup IMF no can do with the POP connector... it picks up the messages and bypasses the IMF capability. Honestly POP is not really a business class protocol and the POP connector was placed there for 'transition purposes'... and folks have been transitioning for a loonnnggg time. If you

Re: [ActiveDir] OT - Exchange 2003 IMF v2 configuration

2006-10-31 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
First off are you using SMTP? And not the Pop connector? Check out this article: http://www.vladville.com/articles/exchangesp2imf.asp Bart Van den Wyngaert wrote: Hi all, I'm having problems with the configuration of the Exchange 2003 IMF v2 (SP2) on a SBS 2003 system. I've enabled it

RE : Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange 2003 ADC Time Sync Issues - Event 8139 - Call to MS PSS

2006-09-08 Thread Yann
Hello,With no luck solving my pb, i called MS PSS for assistance.Thanks,YannYann [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:Hello Tony,Yes, i saw it and i mailed to Scott Anderson who is the author. Headviced meto check that my CAs arewell configured, that was i did. Its pb was exactly the

Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange 2003 ADC Time Sync Issues - Event 8139

2006-09-07 Thread Tony Murray
Yann Did you see this?: http://www.mcse.ms/message568787.html Tony -- Original Message -- From: Yann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:25:02 +0200 (CEST) Hello all, I have 2 sites Exchange 5.5

Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange 2003 ADC Time Sync Issues - Event 8139

2006-09-07 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Latest hotifixes... does that mean you pay for NT4 patches or latest hotfixes when that OS was supported? As that could mean two different things Tony Murray wrote: Yann Did you see this?: http://www.mcse.ms/message568787.html Tony -- Original Message

RE : Re: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange 2003 ADC Time Sync Issues - Event 8139

2006-09-07 Thread Yann
Hello Tony,Yes, i saw it and i mailed to Scott Anderson who is the author. Headviced meto check that my CAs arewell configured, that was i did. Its pb was exactly the same as mine except that replication from AD - Exch 5.5 does not work.I set diag logging on my ADC to maximum,added a

RE: [ActiveDir] OT Exchange 2003

2006-02-17 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Second one under Microsoft Internet Technology.. http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd HofertSent: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:17 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir]

Re: [ActiveDir] OT Exchange 2003

2006-02-17 Thread John Singler
from a posting Michael B. Smith sent awhile ago: The MSExchange.org list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist The Sunbelt Exchange list: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/?forum=exchangelist A Yahoo

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread Michael B. Smith
Exchange supports the concept of a native mode organization as well as native mode admin groups. Its non-intuitive, but you can have a native mode organization without all your admin groups being native mode.If Irecollect properly, the only native mode admin groups are those created in ESM

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread Al Mulnick
Site Folder Considerations The first Exchange server that is installed into an administrative group contains the administrative group's site folders. The site folders maintain copies of the offline address list and the free and busy data for that administrative group. The site folders also

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread Rittenhouse, Cindy \(Police\)
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server Site Folder Considerations The first Exchange server that is installed into an administrative group contains the administrative group's site folders. The site folders maintain copies of the offline address list

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread chris . ryan
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server document

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread Al Mulnick
AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server During the Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003 migration, all public folders and system folders were moved to the first Exchange 2003 server and then removed from the Exchange 5.5 server using pfmigrate

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread Rittenhouse, Cindy \(Police\)
On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:15To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server Hmm.. It's possible that the clients are using one of those replicas then. It's also possible that some clients take longer than they sho

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread Al Mulnick
: Tue 8/23/2005 11:34 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server I have the procedure to update the DN of the siteFolderServer, but I am not familiar with sending a meeting request for the AG to accept to cause it to update. Could you please

RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server

2005-08-23 Thread chris . ryan
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT-Exchange 2003 Site Folder Server document

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-03-24 Thread Lucia Washaya
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep document

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-03-22 Thread 'Jacqui Hurst'
. Hopefully this information will help to prevent others from experiencing such issues. Jacqui From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacqui Hurst Sent: 17 February 2005 04:55 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-03-22 Thread Ricardo . Konno
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep document

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-02-17 Thread Burkes, Jeremy [Contractor]
Are you running the forestprep directly on the server that holds the schema master role? Jeremy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacqui HurstSent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 11:55 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-02-17 Thread 'Jacqui Hurst'
the country code address templates containers. Jacqui From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burkes, Jeremy [Contractor] Sent: 17 February 2005 11:44 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep Are you running

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-02-16 Thread deji
Assuming that the necessary components (SMTP, NNTP, ASP, etc) are already in place on the Exchange server, the only thing I have seen that causes that error is where there is no GC at the site where the Exchange server is located. I have no explanation for why it is so, but I ran into this twice

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Forestprep

2005-02-16 Thread Jacqui Hurst
Pre-requisites all in place and all DC's are GC's so I guess it can't be that. I feel a PSS call coming :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming that the necessary components (SMTP, NNTP, ASP, etc) are already inplace on the Exchange server, the only thing I have seen that causes thaterror is where

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 SP1

2004-05-28 Thread Michael Wassell
] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 SP1 Yep, good thing to publish. Another cool thing, something I actually was involved in a lot of the testing over the last year or so is http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3D0884E6-C603-4 91D- BF57-ACF03E046BFEdisplaylang=en

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 SP1 documentation

2004-05-27 Thread Missy Koslosky
It's my understanding that this information will be released ASAP. I know that it was definitely in the works last night. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Michael Wassell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 4:14 PM Subject:

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 SP1

2004-05-27 Thread joe
: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 SP1 Also continuing the OT note, it seems that the long-awaited server-side spam filtering system (IMF) is available too: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2003/imf/default.asp Apologies

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 SP1

2004-05-25 Thread Ken Schaefer
Also continuing the OT note, it seems that the long-awaited server-side spam filtering system (IMF) is available too: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2003/imf/default.asp Apologies if this has already been posted. Cheers Ken ~~ From:

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Hardening Guide

2004-03-09 Thread Nicolas Blank
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: 09 March 2004 09:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Hardening Guide Good god Rick, you are going to scare the crap out of everyone and I'm not going to be allowed near Redmond nor anywhere else I am going

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange 2003 Hardening Guide

2004-03-08 Thread joe
Good god Rick, you are going to scare the crap out of everyone and I'm not going to be allowed near Redmond nor anywhere else I am going to wear a tag that says, Hi, my name is !joe Ok if you don't get that c humor. Although We now have a fun issue where the RUS is building