RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-28 Thread Guest, Mike
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1 (1) I remember seing it somewhere (while writing this, I remembered the location which can be found in the link below! ;-)) ). INTEGRATING R2 onto a server does impact that server. It just adds options to the Add/Remove Programs list. Installing

Re: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-28 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
:* RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1 (1) I remember seing it somewhere (while writing this, I remembered the location which can be found in the link below! ;-)) ). INTEGRATING R2 onto a server does impact that server. It just adds options to the Add/Remove Programs list. Installing one of the new

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-28 Thread Guest, Mike
@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1 Uh... afaik R2 always has 2 disks (or thinks it should) On MSDN there's two disks for both Standard and Enterprise in the ISO downloads. Exactly what does this media look like? Guest, Mike wrote: As an interesting aside, We noticed

Re: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-28 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: 28 July 2006 14:41 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1 Uh... afaik R2 always has 2 disks (or thinks it should) On MSDN there's two disks for both Standard and Enterprise in the ISO downloads. Exactly what does this media look like? Guest

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-27 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Title: R2 vs w2k3 SP1 whenthe R2 binaries are installed on the server the only thing that happens is that the R2 options are INTEGRATED (not installed). The options still need to be installed additionally. So yes, the only differenceis the list in Add/Remove Programs. There is a small

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-27 Thread neil.ruston
Title: R2 vs w2k3 SP1 whenthe R2 binaries are installed on the server the only thing that happens is that the R2 options are INTEGRATED (not installed). The options still need to be installed additionally. So yes, the only differenceis the list in Add/Remove Programs. [Neil Ruston]is that

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1

2006-07-27 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 vs w2k3 SP1 whenthe R2 binaries are installed on the server the only thing that happens is that the R2 options are INTEGRATED (not installed). The options still need to be installed additionally. So yes, the only differenceis the list in Add/Remove

RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)

2006-02-20 Thread joe
, February 17, 2006 4:19 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1) Joe, shameless brown-nosing Got my order of your book from Amazon the other day (and yes I ordered from the link on your web page). It's sitting on my dining

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-19 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
this SP... /Guido -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Suhovey Sent: Samstag, 18. Februar 2006 01:41 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Do you guys/gals know whether it is true that R2 disk 1 is the same as Windows 2003 SP1? Yep, the same. You can also use the w2k3 cd, then install sp1 and then integrate R2 into the OS SP1, except when the license agreement screen comes up, it lists the OS as 2003 R2 R2 is a new distribution

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:45 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 R2 CD1 == w2k3 SP1. R2 CD2 == addon components. Does that help? neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Derek Harris
To give all of us who paid for Software Assurance a warm fuzzy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 So

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Alexander Suhovey
/f9d70026-ae8b-4969-87 55-1ea1edc4e38e1033.mspx --Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 So Windows

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread joe
, Justin A. Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 So Windows 2003 R2 is nothing more then Windows 2003 SP1??? Then why release R2 at all? Justin A. Salandra MCSE Windows 2000 2003 Network and Technology Services Manager

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Brian Desmond
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 So Windows 2003 R2 is nothing more then Windows 2003 SP1??? Then why release R2 at all? Justin A. Salandra MCSE Windows 2000 2003 Network and Technology Services Manager Catholic Healthcare System 646.505.3681 - office

Re: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Catholic Healthcare System 646.505.3681 - office 917.455.0110 - cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:45 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Bahta, Nathaniel V Contractor NASIC/SCNA
, no kernel changes from R2 to SP1. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Suhovey Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:47 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 All the answers are there on official

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Coleman, Hunter
You're just upset that ADAM has gone Mormon :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:49 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 A couple of reasons 1. As people keep

AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)

2006-02-17 Thread Joe Pochedley
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:49 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 A couple of reasons 1. As people keep buying the product they will buy the SP1 version of it which has significant updates for security, etc. Best

RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)

2006-02-17 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1) Joe, shameless brown-nosing Got my order of your book from Amazon the other day (and yes I ordered from the link on your web page). It's sitting on my dining room table just waiting to be read. Hopefully I'll have

RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1

2006-02-17 Thread Alexander Suhovey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta, Nathaniel V Contractor NASIC/SCNA Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:04 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1 [..] Microsoft does not declare

RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1)

2006-02-17 Thread Joe Pochedley
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 4:47 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: AD2000 to 2003R2 (thread hijacking - was RE: [ActiveDir] R2 and W2K3 SP1) Hope you don't mind me answering this... The same rules