RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-18 Thread gturner
PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:35:37 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Re: small correction: it's not the USNs that are increased = it the version Re: number Re: Re: and as far as I understand it, an object won't inherit an attribut until Re: it's used

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-18 Thread activedirsmaporg
, Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:35:37 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Re: small correction: it's not the USNs that are increased = it the version Re: number Re: Re: and as far as I understand it, an object won't inherit

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-18 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
... /Guido -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Well, first GT, below I think you're thinking of version numbers

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-18 Thread gturner
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Re: thanks Brett for the confirmation and clarification Re: Re: If we set meta-data elements for all attributes for unset attributes Re: just to get a delete of the attribute to win (remember there are Re: 100s Re: of unset attributes

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-17 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:50 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Brett, thanks for post reply ADC - ex2k3 active directory connector CA - is connection agreement defined within ADC ... So is

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-17 Thread activedirsmaporg
] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Auth restore will auth restore attributes that _exist_ in the backup as they were at the time of backup, but not auth restore attributes that didn't exist

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-17 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
). /Guido -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore We actually go one step further than this ... we also if we're in LVR mode

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-17 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
] Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Guido, thanks for post reply full recovery of the domain is what i have fallen back to - was looking for a sanity check on this issue of authoritative (or not so as it seems

Re: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-16 Thread activedirsmaporg
Auth restore will auth restore attributes that _exist_ in the backup as they were at the time of backup, but not auth restore attributes that didn't exist. Ergo it kind of works as a merge of old attributes that were set and new attributes that were set post backup. ... So is the CA data perhaps

RE: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore

2004-08-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] w2k authoritative restore Auth restore will auth restore attributes that _exist_ in the backup as they were at the time of backup, but not auth restore attributes that didn't exist. Ergo it kind of works as a merge