RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-20 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Blair Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 When I ran across this problem about a year and half ago, I found an article that suggested a secondary WINS entry. I will keep searching to find it. It was due to the request

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-20 Thread joe
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 7:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 It doesn't fail, it then relies on broadcasting. What that article talked about was putting the same WINS server in the TCPIP settings twice so

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Wilson, Julie
Have you entered a static WINS address in the TCP/IP properties? If not try it. Julie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:25 PM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] win98 ok, i've installed

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Kern, Tom
yup -Original Message- From: Wilson, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 Have you entered a static WINS address in the TCP/IP properties? If not try it. Julie -Original Message- From

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Wilson, Julie
Hmmm...Upgrade the machine to 2K Pro :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 yup -Original Message- From: Wilson, Julie

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Wilson, Julie
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 yup -Original Message- From: Wilson, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:29 PM

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Mulnick, Al
] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 yup -Original Message- From: Wilson, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 Have you

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
Are the TCPIP settings correct on the 98 machines? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:25 PM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] win98 ok, i've installed the dsclient, i've disabled the secure

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Kern, Tom
nice... -Original Message- From: Wilson, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 Hmmm...Upgrade the machine to 2K Pro :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
What are the two? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 What shows up in the DC security logs when the 98 client attempts to attach

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Kern, Tom
- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 What are the two? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:07 PM

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Kern, Tom
i added a second wins server and that worked??!! -Original Message- From: Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 Digitally Sign Communications (always) - Set to DISABLED Digitally encrypt or sign secure channel data - Set

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Chris Blair
. -Original Message- From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 Ok, I would be checking that first WINS Server really closely at this point... joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread joe
Ok, I would be checking that first WINS Server really closely at this point... joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 i added a second

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
what's the DNS config of this client? don't remember if Win98 has nslookup, but from a different client that has, you should run nslookup %DNSname_of_domain% = should get back a list of your DCs for that domain - do you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Mulnick, Al
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 Ok, I would be checking that first WINS Server really closely at this point... joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread Justin_Leney
Return Receipt Your RE: [ActiveDir] win98 document

RE: [ActiveDir] win98

2004-05-19 Thread joe
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:15 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 When you say you added a second wins server, do you mean a physical wins server or a second one was defined (possibly

RE: [ActiveDir] win98 and win2ksp4

2004-04-16 Thread Kern, Tom
actually, the error is username cannot be found. WINS is configured and running. I even made a #PRE and #DOM entries to the lmhosts file with the /1c and /1b netbios suffix for the pdc emulator dc which is running sp3. still same error. any suggestions? thanks -Original Message- From:

RE: [ActiveDir] win98 and win2ksp4

2004-04-16 Thread Mulnick, Al
%3Dwindows%2B2003%2Bwindows%2B98%2BGPO I can't recall if all of those settings existed in 2K sp4 though. :) Al -Original Message- From: Kern, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 and win2ksp4 actually

RE: [ActiveDir] win98 and win2ksp4

2004-04-16 Thread joe
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] win98 and win2ksp4 Both are set to undefined. you'd think that'd be the same as disabled. Actually, I don't see the exact settings he describes

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line

2003-10-31 Thread Tony Murray
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan Sent: Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003 06:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line Matjaz! You finally made it over here. Welcome and good to have you. Your expertise will be a very welcome addition. Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT Microsoft

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line

2003-10-30 Thread Rick Kingslan
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matja Ladava Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line Windows 9x/Me don't have a computer account in AD, so you don't join them to the AD, you just log in to domain. Regards

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line

2003-10-29 Thread Matja Ladava
Windows 9x/Me don't have a computer account in AD, so you don't join them to the AD, you just log in to domain. Regards Matjaz Ladava -Original Message- From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir]

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line

2003-10-29 Thread Sullivan, Kevin
Command line or other it is not possible. WinNT and above are required for membership in a domain whether it is NT or AD. Win98 can 'browse' in the domain but it can not be a security principal. Kevin Sullivan -Original Message- From: Chris Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line

2003-10-29 Thread Craig Cerino
Chris, sorry but 9x machines can is only able to browse the domain to see devices it can not become a security member of an AD domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Blair Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:28 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line

2003-10-29 Thread Craig Cerino
I am also sorry for the HORRIBLE grammar typo. J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 AD from CMD Line Chris, sorry

Re: [ActiveDir] Win98 remote-administration features from AD?

2002-07-12 Thread Tony Murray
I'm not aware of any native Windows 2000 or AD tools that would allow you to remotely administer Win98 clients. Are you thinking of something similar to the XP Remote Desktop functionality? There are some built-in remote adminstration services available with Win98, but these are limited and

RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 remote-administration features from AD?

2002-07-12 Thread Paul Sobey
PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] Win98 remote-administration features from AD? McAfee used to (not sure if they still support) sell RemoteDesktop. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Friday, July 12