Re: Invalid version: 2, could not load org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory

could you post a stack trace generated by the exception ? On 25 Jan 2007, at 07:59, Julian Exenberger wrote: Hi I suddenly receive this error as well and I am definitely using activemq 4.1 rajdavies wrote: np -kenneth, using Mule has that affect on people (sry - couldn't resist!)

Re: Activemq 4.2 integrtion with weblogic 9.2 error

there is a later snapshot - built on the 24th January 2007 - would you mind trying with that one cheers, Rob On 25 Jan 2007, at 08:55, krishnadas wrote: Hi fellow members, When i tried to install activemq4.2 rar with weblogic 9.2 i got the following error.I used apache-activemq-4.2-

AMQ4.1.0: messages stucked in the queue when send fast

Hey, I've been fighting the following problem for few hours now. Lets limit it to a very trivial test. Send, say 10, messages in a for loop, without waits between iterations via JmsTemplate of Spring. ObjectMessage. Not all messages are consumed. Sometimes all, more often ca 8-9. Through JMX,

Re: Dropped IP packets

Hi, I've found out the reason for this: my messages were too large. So I'll have to employ streaming! I found this when looking for help to my problem: Hiram Chirino wrote: if the OS can't keep up with the ip packets due to full 100% CPU usage it will start to close sockets. And thus

Re: AMQ4.1.0: messages stucked in the queue when send fast

magic.moose wrote: Hey, I've been fighting the following problem for few hours now. Lets limit it to a very trivial test. Send, say 10, messages in a for loop, without waits between iterations via JmsTemplate of Spring. ObjectMessage. Not all messages are consumed. Sometimes all, more

a new jms broker started by Consumer

All, Sorry for long message. I tried to set up ActiveMQ broker and got following error when try to create a connection at consumer side. ActiveMQConnectionFactory factory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("tcp://localhost:61616"); connection = factory.createQueueConnection(); I don't

Re: a new jms broker started by Consumer

Gulp! - a known issue this is fixed in 4.2 cheers, Rob On 25 Jan 2007, at 14:16, Tony Qian wrote: All, Sorry for long message. I tried to set up ActiveMQ broker and got following error when try to create a connection at consumer side. ActiveMQConnectionFactory factory = new

Re: Destination is not an instance of SpyDestination

This looks like jboss.mq is not compliant with the JMS spec. Messages from a foreign JMS provider (including the Destination) should be able to be pass through any other JMS compliant JMS provider cheers, Rob On 25 Jan 2007, at 14:14, miniman wrote: All i have an EJB which i use to send

Message lost during failover

Hi, I am testing JDBC Master/Slave failover as described here: http://www.activemq.org/site/jdbc-master-slave.html. The setup works but I noticed there can be lost messages during the failover. My setup is the following: * ActiveMQ 4.1.0 (linux distribution), ran wih the wrapper. * Postgresql

Re: a new jms broker started by Consumer

Hi Tony, well, maybe I responded too quickly. This certainly looks like another issue that was in 4.1 - but without more details I can't be certain You can get snapshots here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2- snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/ cheers, Rob On 25

Can't set prefetch size!

Hi. AMQ4.1.0, Jencks, Spring 1.2.7. Prefetch size for all queues is always 10. I tried to CHANGE it in many places: - in broker url (both in conf xml and embedded into connectionFactory). - in activationSpec destination name. - in xml config queue (name || physicalName ??). It stays 10...

Re: AMQ4.1.0: messages stucked in the queue when send fast

How can I get a version with a patch applied? svn only? M.M. Christopher G. Stach II wrote: magic.moose wrote: Hey, I've been fighting the following problem for few hours now. Lets limit it to a very trivial test. Send, say 10, messages in a for loop, without waits between iterations

Re: Destination is not an instance of SpyDestination

I am using the sample code and simple messages to send messages from an external client into activemq via an embedded broker on jboss... Should this not work out of the bag ? rajdavies wrote: This looks like jboss.mq is not compliant with the JMS spec. Messages from a foreign JMS

Re: AMQ4.1.0: messages stucked in the queue when send fast

magic.moose wrote: How can I get a version with a patch applied? svn only? M.M. Christopher G. Stach II wrote: AMQ-1078? I attached the diff to the issue. You just need to recompile that single class after you patch it. -- Christopher G. Stach II

Remote C# app listening

Can a remote C# client receive messages from an embedded Jetty broker that is running vm://localhost:61616 as long as that port is open to the outside? Or do I have to run an activemq broker standalone on the server, and have jetty connect to it via tcp, and also the remote client via tcp?

couldn't add consumers after existing consumers are killed (deadlock in broker)

i am using activemq-4.0.2. i am running a test with 6 producers continously sending stomp message to a queue, with 6 consumers on the same queue. if i kill -9 all the consumers (which are all in one process), and restart the consumers again, sometimes (about 30% of the time) the consumers cannot

Newbie question: use of activemq-web-console with remote broker

Hello: I would like to use the activemq-web-console to connect to a non embedded broker. Is it reasonable to attempt this configuration? I have tried with both v4.1.0 and v4.2, but an embedded broker is always started that conflicts the remote broker. Thanks in advance for help on

Re: couldn't add consumers after existing consumers are killed (deadlock in broker)

I feel your pain - this is fixed in 4.2 - you can get a snapshot here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ activemq/apache-activemq/4.2-incubator-SNAPSHOT/ cheers, Rob On 25 Jan 2007, at 18:53, igah wrote: i am using activemq-4.0.2. i am running a test with

Re: couldn't add consumers after existing consumers are killed (deadlock in broker)

thanks for the info. is it possible to get a patch to 4.0.2? i cannot really upgrade to 4.2 at this moment. thanks a lot. I feel your pain - this is fixed in 4.2 - you can get a snapshot here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/

2007 Extended Daylight Saving Time

Are they any issues with ActiveMQ and this years extended daylight saving time?

Re: topics - activemq-cpp

I'm not sure what client you're using, but I assure you it isn't activemq-cpp. For one, there is no class AMQTopic. Perhaps you're using the openwire-cpp client? Or maybe the amazon client? On 1/25/07, Lalit Nagpal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I try to REPLY BACK to a message like this

Use jencks to async receive message, there are always some messages are left in the queue

(1)Environment: use Activemq and Spring to send message, use Activemq and Jencks to receive message asynchronously. We use jconsole to monitor. (2)Phenomenon: We use non-persistent queue to send message asynchronously, use jencks to receive message asynchronously, jencks use multiple-session

Re: Use jencks to async receive message, there are always some messages are left in the queue

Waves wrote: (1)Environment: use Activemq and Spring to send message, use Activemq and Jencks to receive message asynchronously. We use jconsole to monitor. (2)Phenomenon: We use non-persistent queue to send message asynchronously, use jencks to receive message asynchronously, jencks use

Suggestion on how to get a unique id for a queue?

Hello: In my app I employ activeMQ + Spring…and it consist in many client who communicate with a server who respond with different message for different client through many queue, this queues are created in the client side.. Now I need an automatic way to obtain a unique name for each queue in