Hi,
Can someone tell me what AIX device drivers are required for the StorageTek
L700 or if any StorageTek device drivers are required ?
Config is AIX 4.3.3 HBA's FC 6778.
L700 containing 6 9840 drives which are fibre attached to SAN . The robot
arm is scsi attached to the server.
The scsi
Tried Wanda's idea last night. Backup completed in what we expect the normal
time to be. This is using my logon (admin auth on the local NT resource
domain) and opening a window with the command dsmc sched.
Not sure what this tells us though I'm thinking this is still in the
foreground vs.
Nazir
The tape status is full. Once a tape is full it will not be written to
again until it is reclaimed. The value of 30.4% represents the amount of
data on the tape that has not been expired in accordance with the policies
that you have set through the management classes in which you ran
If you are intent on shutting down your database first, you don't need the
TDP, and in fact the TDP needs to run with the DB up. You will do offline
full backups.
The TDP uses RMAN, which is included with Oracle 8. RMAN implements
incremental backups, among many other things. The TDP allows
Hi all,
If a directory has been archived and the archsylinkasfile option has not
been set, is there an option that can be set on the retrieve to only
restore the symbolic links.
Many thanks
Jason
Dear listers
I have a this message :
ANS8015E File 'DD:DSCOPT', error code 109 from options processing.
what's mean error code 109 ?
Anybody can help me ?
Thanks
Cordialement
P.ZANNI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01 44 93 21 66
What Resourceutilization number are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Magura, Curtis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Background / Foreground Performance Mystery
Tried Wanda's idea last night. Backup completed in
Depending on circumstances, this might be a candidate for adaptive
differencing, TSMs version of a block level incremental. You will still
have to at least once do a complete backup of the big files though.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology,
Hi ...all
I have a question with the tapes. I have 4 Compaq DLT 7000 in TSM 4.2.1.9
in Windows NT. My server have only one SCSI adapter and only 3 of the 4 DLT
work fine, but one doesn't work. This tape work fine in Windows NT (NT
Backup). When I try to write I received this error messages:
Curious indeed... did you try falling back to the older client? If you
do, i would suggest setting up a temporary node on the server and test
under that name... there may be some incompatibilities between backups from
different client levels, and you probably don't want to be flipping back
and
We run TSM V4.1 server under OS390 V2.9. A Windows NT4 client is doing a
scheduled backup of the C, D and E drives. The C drive backup completes ok
but the D drive backup fails with ANS1228E Sending of object
xxx failed and ANS4018E Error processing
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm currently migrating from a 3494 to a 3584 library. When I use the Next
Storagepool option only one migrate starts. I have two drives in the 3494
and 6 drives in the 3584, so I have enough capacity for two concurrent
migrates, but I cannot find a way to control this. Is there any
I had the same problem with my DLT8000 drives. I had one at the end of the chain that
had problems from the start. I checked the cables and all, but nothing. I then went
into the TSM Admin config gui, (deleted all the drives first) and then readded them.
Works fine now.. TSM server 4.2.1.6 on
Thank you very much Joe for your answer, I will try this because I don't
have the machine in this site.
I try and then let you know.
Regards.
Hi John!
The migproc parameter is not valid for sequential access storage pools...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 15:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migration
Hi *SM-ers
Rather than use TSM to backup systemobjects we are using NTBACKUP to backup
systemstate. This allows us to do a bare metal restore which TSM doesn't
support. However we appear to have no option but to backup systemobjects
with TSM because we feel much safer specifying all-local rather
Hi Curtis,
do you have LARGECOMMBUFFERS set to YES in the dsm.opt? If so change it to
NO and try it once again.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With best regards,
Bien amicalement,
CU/2,
Dirk Billerbeck
Dirk Billerbeck
GE CompuNet Kiel
Enterprise Computing
update stg yourpool migpro=2
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/30/2002 02:13:02 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Migration for a sequential access storage pool
Hi *SM-ers!
I'm
Regarding the long file name issue, you should refer to APAR IC27346. This
APAR has a fairly detailed explanation of the problem and should answer
most of your questions on this subject. If you have access to looking up
IBM APARs, you can go that route. Otherwise try looking in the ADSM-L
Hi
Using TKG BareMetalRestore for TSM can do a fully automated restore of a
machine, and it's easy to use.
We have two customers running this, and a restore of a 20GB machine takes
aprox. 30-40 mins(depending on network and so on).
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
Wasn't TKG just bought out by Backup Exec???
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sparrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 and systemstate backup
Hi
Using TKG BareMetalRestore for TSM can do a fully
Yes, but Tivoli still has contracts with TKG to deliver products. And I
don't see why Veritas would mind selling the product to TSM.
The only thing irritating me, was that Veritas was ahead of Tivoli. Tivoli
should have bought TKG a long time ago.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
Hi
My question is I have a primary storage pool DISK1 and is next storage
pool is DISK2 and the next storage is TAPE1
If my DISK1 became full (lo=30 hi=95) it will migrate the data to DISK2.
Now I want to migrate everything (DISK1 + DISK2) to TAPE1. Did I have just
to lo=0 hi=0 for DISK1 or
Well I can see support for Tivoli in TKG products waning in the future now
that Veritas owns it
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sparrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 and systemstate backup
Philippe, Please Please Please use a subject line. With the many emails I
receive each day, keeping track of threads is a nightmare when posts to the
board come through with no subject line. In any case, you failed to mention
which platform client was displaying the error, the TSM server or
Using Adaptive Differencing means that it's not the whole file that is
backed up because it has changed, only the changes in the file are backed
up. This mean that if your 1.8GB file is changed with 50MB each day, only
the 50MB is backed up each night.
Adaptive Differencing is an included
Both of them in order to ensure that all of the data winds up in TAPE1.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs, CO 80949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax: (240)539-7175
-Original
Hi Dirk!
Thought about that, but it requires a lot of manual intervention. I was
hoping for a automated solution, but I'm beginning to think there isn't
one...
Thanks anyway!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Billerbeck [mailto:[EMAIL
I have one full backup. What could be the solution? The files change
with minor changes every day but 1.8GB file is backuped up from scratch every
day.
Regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30.01.2002 16:39
Please respond
Hi Eric,
what about multiple move data volumename stgp=3584pool processes (I'm
assuming you don't want to use the 3494 any longer. If you want to use both
libraries together and just extend your storage pool hierarchy then forget
my idea).
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With
Like with OS X many of us are waiting for EXT3 filesystem support
Maybe now that Lou is leaving the helm at IBM we will see more development
in the Tivoli area.
At 01:30 PM 1/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
I just installed 4.2.0.0 on a Linux86 box with 2.4.7-10 version. I am
getting ANS1149E No
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, John Bremer wrote:
Like with OS X many of us are waiting for EXT3 filesystem support
Maybe now that Lou is leaving the helm at IBM we will see more development
in the Tivoli area.
At 01:30 PM 1/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
I just installed 4.2.0.0 on a Linux86 box
We are running with the default of no per the TSM Performance and Tuning
guide that I'm looking at.
Curt Magura
Lockheed Martin EIS
Gaithersburg, Md.
301-240-6305
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Billerbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks for the info Andy. However, I cannot see which PTF fixes IC27346 and
which level of the client code incorporates the fix. The Support Centre in
the UK does not have this info!
Thanks.
Paul William Tomes
IS / TSG
UISL
Bournemouth, England
Tel: 01202-407568
Original Message-
Hi Curtis,
I'm still clueless, but I think it has to be a Windows thing.
Ask one of the NT guys to look at your account and the SYSTEM account on the
machine and see what the differences are.
I'd also try turning off any virus checking software (temporarily) and see
if that makes a difference.
Eric, I went through a similar process last year. There are a couple of
things you can do. The immediate fix is to update your 3494 pool and change
MIGPROCess to 2; the default is 1. You could also do multiple Move Data
processes.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
I have been asked by my customer if it is possible to mix SCSI and SAN
attached drives on TSM servers that are to perform LAN free backup.
I know that I need to drivemapp all the SAN drives but what will TSM do with
the SCSI attached drives, is it cleaver enough to make sure that it doesn't
Hi Curtis,
what is the value of the TCPWINDOWSIZE parameter in the dsm.opt? According
to Tivoli for Windows NT it shouldn't be greater than 63 (KB). Other values
aren't supported by NT and would cause the TSM client to use the default
value of 32.
And another thing you can look for (in the
Sorry for the subject line
There is a TSM server on OS/390. When TSM start, there is the error ANS8015E with
error code 109.
I don't know why !
P.ZANNI
-Message d'origine-
De: George Lesho [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: mercredi 30 janvier 2002 16:45
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Being on OS/390, check your TSOADMIN.OPTIONS and ANRSERV.OPTIONS files, you have
something set incorrectly in one of these. If you want to, include them in a return
message.
Thanks, Ryan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Philippe ZANNI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Jan
Not a problem at all. TSM does not care how they are attached. TSM depends
completely on the operating system for the intelligence on the attaching.
The 3494 is also intelligent enough to know if someone else is using the
drive that it can't. Drive map all the SAN drives??? What you could
I certainly am not an OS/390 expert but the error code ANS prefix indicates
it is a client problem specifically with the client option file. I would
figure out which client option file was causing the error and replace it.
If it is a Windows client, save it as a DOS type text file and remove any
I have a TSM server (Win2K 4.1.5) and it also has a TSM client (4.1.3)
installed. The error log looks great except for a
recurring entry with no error code as follows:
01/23/2002 16:45:48 ConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Logoff console event .
01/23/2002 16:45:48 ConsoleEventHandler(): Process
Thanks Dirk.
TCPWindowsize is set to 63.
We do run with Shareddynamic but the retry count is set to one.
The part that just baffles me is that all of the various parameters that
have been suggested by the list are (or least should be) the same. It's the
same dsm.opt file, same disk, same
From: Matthew Glanville
You might want to turn on TSM client side compression...
In my experience notes databases can get at least 50% compressed.
Your backups will most likely go down to 2 hours, or even more.
TSM: update node node_name compress=yes
Give it a try. For low bandwith lines I
Becky,
the fact that TSM doesn't care how the drives are attached is the part that
scares me. To me it sounds like:
-TSM might mount a tape in driveX, which could be SCSI attached
-TSM tell the storage agent to use driveX (which it doesn't have a clue
about as it is SCSI) and the backup will
Actually, they were bought by Veritas Software.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
You will see that each time the Win2K box is re-booted. My belief is that is
the scheduling service reporting that is has been told to shut down by the
OS when the system is shutting down. You can safely ignore it.
-Original Message-
From: George Lesho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
In the 3.7 and 4.1 client you see that message whenever the scheduler is
stopped.
If you know the system was rebooted or someone stopped/started the scheduler
service, then it's normal.
If not, check the Win2K SYSTEM and APP event logs to see if the scheduler
died unexpectedly (it could have
Paul,
The problem was fixed in version 3.7.2 starting with 3.7.2.16. The problem
was fixed in version 4 starting with version 4.1.1 and up.
Be sure to read the APA R text carefully! If you are running 4.1.3, then
the problem should be fixed there, unless your file names are exceeding
the TSM
The StorageAgent can only map drives which its operating system knows
about! The mapping process maps StorageAgent RMTs to TSM server logical
drives.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc.
121 Cheshire Lane #700
Minnetonka, MN 55305
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 952-931-1203
F:
This is one of those questions that has an obvious answer: of course TSM
knows which drives it's working with. The mapping is set ahead of time and
the library manager knows what drives the storage agents can and cannot see.
It won't attempt to mount a tape in a drive the storage agent can't
Matt,
Are you running two, maybe 3 compression routines. i.e. once at the client, once at
the server level (you'll see if you q devclass f=d on a sequential storage device) and
once at the hardware level
(micro code).
If so, have you kept check on the amount of data in your stgpool. I
From: Matthew Glanville
Joe,
I do not believe there is such a thing as 'server' level compression. My
understanding is that the device class compression settings are reflecting
the hardware level compression settings, they can override what the
microcode may have set the 'default' to.
We have
SMers,
Does anybody out there know any utilities that can be run from AIX
for the 3995 optical drive. Utilities like tapeutil or mtlib (3494)
If so could please email me ...Thanks in advance.
Demetrius
Matt,
Don't be so sure... my MVS folks are telling me that there is no way TSM is over
riding their micro-code hardware level compression. (but I will double check with
them and again as well as with
Tivoli).
With regard to compressing data twice, I disagree. There's something very
HI, I need HELLLP!!
TSM backup processes that last week took 51 minutes, now take 8 - 28 hours.
We know of no changes to the TSM 4.2.1.9 Server running on OS/390 V2R9.
It looks like the servers are ready to send data and TSM is ready to
receive. The routers are indicate very low
Do you mean TSM sessions, client backing up to TSM server? or processes, TSM server
copying or migrating data to tape?
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Hunley, Ike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need help with TSM
Thanks for your response. I mean TSM sessions, client backing up to TSM
server? or processes, TSM server copying, migrating data to tape and
archiving.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take a large file (at least 100 MB, preferably larger) and FTP it from one
of your servers to your OS/390 host.
See how long it takes.
Do it 3 or 4 times until you can get consistent timings.
Then try backing up that large file with TSM 3 or 4 times, see how long it
takes.
(Preferably use the
Ike, I don't know much about your environment but if there were no changes
to TSM configuration, I would look at the client corresponding to the slow
session. If your
client is AIX, run entstat (actually entstat -d ent0) to check your network
interface.
If there are large error totals, you may
Tivoliv has me changing BUFPOOLSIZE to 1/2 the region size.
-Original Message-
From: George Lesho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need help with TSM process slowdowns
Ike, I don't know much about your environment
When a session is in idle wait, what could it be waiting for? Per Tivoli I
increased BUFPOOLSIZE. It seems not to have had much affect.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and
affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail
message. Any
Compression is set at the OS level in the mainframe. So, whatever your MVS
folks say is what it is.
-Original Message-
From: Wholey, Joseph (TGA\MLOL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: low bandwitdth and big files
Date:Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:55:17 -0500
From:Bruce Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New install of TSM and MMC
Is this mgmt console only in ver 4.2 or is it also available for 4.1?
Bruce Kamp
Bruce,
A TSM snap-in was included with 4.1 but its function was limited to the
local
Hi TSMers,
We are running TSM 3.7.4.0 on AIX 4.3.3 . I tried the command
cancel session PID=9465 but had no luck.
Normally, the admin session is cancelled when we exit but ocassionally it
remians there. This only happens spasmodically
and is from the command line backup client
66 matches
Mail list logo
