URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Vazquez Vegas, Sergio
Hi people! I've done a very large backup from a node with a determined Management Class. Is there any way to rebind all the files in that backup to another one? I mean, can I change the retention of that backup without doing the backup again? Thanks in advance Este mensaje de correo

Urgent!! TDP for Informix 64bit version and Solaris 8

2002-02-01 Thread Marc Layne
Hi all I need to know if TDP for informix supports 64 bit version of Informix running on Solaris 8 platform. If not, does anyone know when this will be supported???. This is the environment: Operating System: Solaris 8 - 64 bit Database: Tools: 7.30 FC 7 64 bit Engine: IDS9.30 FC1 64 bit Kind

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Andrew Raibeck
1) If you want to make a permanent change to the management class, just update the management class's copygroup attributes and activate the policy set. 2) If you want to change the management class to which the files are bound, put the necessary INCLUDE statement(s) in the options file to

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Vazquez Vegas, Sergio
Thanks by the answer but I wondered whether ther is a way of rebind files already backed up withou running again the backup. -Mensaje original- De: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:01 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: URGENT:

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Michael Bartl
Hi Andy, is there also a way to rebind inactive versions that do not have an active version? I changed the RETAINONLY value for the management class, but there was no rebinding of the already inactive versions. I think I could create a new Policy Domain with different retention periods and then

PRESCHEDULECMD on OS390 unix, rc 127

2002-02-01 Thread MC Matt Cooper (2838)
Hello all, I am trying to get a PRESCHEDULECMD script that will automount all the users HFSs for backup. I know there is a command for automount but I have to update the list of users automounted daily. We are just getting into this area and it is growing. Anyway, I execut the

Tivoli SAN definition - tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte

2002-02-01 Thread Jason Morgan
Hi, I am having trouble the tivoli.tsm.device.fcprte fileset. I have uninstalled the tivoli.tsm.devices.rte fileset as recommended along with the messages. I have then tried to install the tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte fileset with only the messages being installed. Has anyone encountered this

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Jack Musselman
No! Rebinding only occurs upon the next backup cycle. If you do not do another backup, the files will not be bound to a changed policy of a management class. Jack -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vazquez Vegas, Sergio Sent: Friday,

policy domain suggestion

2002-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A client asked me to create the following policy domain: The incremental backup of every night has the copy group *) Versions Data Exists = nolimit *) Versions Data Deleted = nolimit *) Retain Extra Version = 33 *) Retain Only Version = 33 The backup of the Friday has to be retained for 4 weeks.

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hi Michael! Changing an inactive file's management class/copygroup attributes would, of course, change the way the inactive versions are managed without having to do any rebinding or re-backing up. This may not be feasible if you don't want to alter the management policy for other files bound to

TSM on a SAN.

2002-02-01 Thread Stuart Pitt
Hi, TSM 4.2 NT 4 SP6a Library Compaq MSL5026 Currently trying to get TSM working on a San. I am unable to see the library, that is also on the San. Do I need an additional piece of software, or am I doing something wrong. Regards Stuart

volume history file

2002-02-01 Thread Leijnse, Finn F SITI-ITDSES31
Hi, We have just taken control of a TSM server on AIX rs/6000 with TSM V3.7 and 4x drives in a LIB_3575. The first thing that struck us was that the library had run out of tape slots to put more scratch tapes. We found out that there was never a delete set-up for the volume history file and by

Re: Data Recovery on Expired files

2002-02-01 Thread Warren, Matthew James
Also, to be absoloutley sure that tapes would not have been overwritten, set the volume re-use delay on the storage pool to as long as you keep DB Backups for. Otherwise, you may restore to an older DB Backup and find that the restored DB expects files to exist on tapes that have been

Re: Tivoli SAN definition - tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte

2002-02-01 Thread Allen Barth
Jason, you cannot have both. ..rte is scsi support ..fcprte is scsi AND fcp support de-install the .rte and then install the .fcprte Al Jason Morgan jmorga31@CSC. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] COM cc:

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Seay, Paul
This was discussed recently. Create a new management class and set it as the default or put a management class definition in your incl/excl for each line and run the backup again. Remember it will not backup anything that has already been backed up but it will rebind everything. If you would

Re: TSM on a SAN.

2002-02-01 Thread Mike Swinhoe
Have you installed the tape drive on the TSM Host server to make it the library manager? Regards, Michael Swinhoe Storage Management Group Stuart Pitt STUART.PITT@ITo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NNOGY.COMcc:

Re: Tivoli SAN definition - tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte

2002-02-01 Thread Allen Barth
OOPS, it's early and I hit the reply before all your text registered in the grey noodle. Is there enough room in /usr? Have you installed the device drivers for the fcp adapter card? Jason Morgan jmorga31@CSC. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: policy domain suggestion

2002-02-01 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Based on your copygroup settings: The backup of the Friday has to be retained for 4 weeks. For the above case, your copygroup settings guarantee that you will be able to recover any backup version up to 33 days ago, which exceeds the 4 week (28 day) requirement. The backup of the first of

Re: volume history file

2002-02-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
Deleting volumehistory doesn't affect storage pool tapes. It will delete old DB Backup or EXPORT tapes, and return them to the scratch pool. If you have DRM active, normally DRM would eject the DB Backup tapes, but perhaps no one has been running the DRM commands to remove them.

HP C1557 A

2002-02-01 Thread Oliver Martin
I want to define a TSM library with an HP C1557A ( SureStore 24x6 Autoloader ), and I only could define a library with the type manual and not with the type scsi. Is that true ? Oli

3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Gene Greenberg
SMers I'm currently using a 3575 tape library and have to make or not make a recommendation to move to a 3494 library. For those who have one already I'd be interested in your eval of the 3494, good, bad or indefferent. Thanks for your help Gene

Re: TSM on a SAN.

2002-02-01 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
What type of library is it? What Fibre Channel components are you using? -- Joshua S. Bassi Sr. Solutions Architect IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (415) 215-0326 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
I have installed 20 or so of these libraries. They are absolutely the best tape library in the industry. -- Joshua S. Bassi Sr. Solutions Architect IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM Cell (415) 215-0326 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

3995 C62 Installation on 7025-F80

2002-02-01 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
Good afternoon, SMers! Has anyone ever installed a 3995 C62 Library Dataserver on a RS/6000 7025-F80? We have a 4-K adapter feature code 6206 PCI SCSI-2 Single Ended Fast/Wide . Also, we are trying to figure out whether or not you have to set the dip-switches located on the back of the 3995.

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Prather, Wanda
It's an absolutely fabulous piece of enterprise-class hardware. I can't think of any reason you would be sorry you had one. -Original Message- From: Gene Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3494 Tape Library

Re: TSM on a SAN.

2002-02-01 Thread Joe Cascanette
Our setup here is Windows 2000 server, with TSM 4.2.1.6 connected to a Compaq SAN via fibre switch. We have a Modular Data Router connected to a 9236EX DLT library and to the SAN via fibre, this MDR takes data via the fibre and sends it down the SCSI cable to library. Not sure if you need a

TDP for Oracle on Sun Solaris 7 64-bit kernel - TSM Client, API and TDP package compatibility

2002-02-01 Thread Kent Monthei
We have a TSM v4.1.2 Server on Sun Solaris 7 (64-bit kernel). I need to install TDP for Oracle for testing with an Oracle 8.1.7 database RMAN, could use some guidance. What's are the compatible version-combinations of: TDP for Oracle pkg: TDPoracle TSM API pkg:

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Bill Mansfield
I would also suggest that you look at the 3584 tape library. It has some limitations vs. the 3494, but it is considerably less expensive. The major differences are: - The 3584 cannot be attached to a mainframe. Not an issue when replacing a 3575. - The LTO drives in the 3584 are poorer at load

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Davidson, Becky
We have a 3494 and it works great. We also have a 3584 which works well. What kind of purpose are you going to use it for? Becky -Original Message- From: Gene Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3494 Tape Library

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Charles Anderson
The 3494 tape library is the best thing since sliced bread. However, learning how to use the aforementioned bread can be kind of .. difficult. However, being an IBM product, there is more than adequate documentation for you to learn from. -ed

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread William Rosette
We have had a 3494 tape library for the last 2 years and it has been kind of cumbersome. The cost effectiveness seems to run on the costly side for what I am getting. I have heard (not experienced) of other tape libraries with greater capacity, less cost, and less foot space, but I do not know

Re: Tivoli SAN definition - tivoli.tsm.devices.fcprte

2002-02-01 Thread Jason Morgan
The strange thing is , I de-installed both the tivoli.tsm.devices filesets and installed the 4.2 filesets and everything seem to work ok. I am not sure if I can run version 4.2 device support with a 4.1 server. Cheers Jason. Allen Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 01/02/2002 15:50:52

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Pearson, Dave
We use the 3494 tape library with 8 3590 tape drives. We use for both UNIX/AIX and IBM Mainframe. It been good to us. We had the library for the last 5 years. LTO may hold more info... But the library is so solid. I understand for restoring data , the 3590 get better performance then the LTO

Re: 3494 Tape Library

2002-02-01 Thread Gene Greenberg
The 3575 we are currently using backs up aix servers as well as nt systems. The biggest problem has been to keep enough scratch tapes available. I'm currently rotating around 600 tapes that hold appox. 20gb eachdepending on compression. Also in the past we have not had the luxuary of a fiber

Re: URGENT: Rebinding

2002-02-01 Thread Jim Taylor
I have asked this question with TSM support before. Responce: NO There are only two ways of chaning the retention period of a backup. Redo the backup. - or - Change the retention parameters within the manaement class used to do the backup. However, this will change the retention of any

Re: Cannot delete copy pool volume

2002-02-01 Thread Jim Taylor
Try running an 'audit volume xx' Then try the delete -Original Message- From: Tom Hrouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cannot delete copy pool volume Hi all, my problem is the copy pool volume cannot be deleted.

Re: HP C1557 A

2002-02-01 Thread Hunny Kershaw
Oliver, That is not true. HP C1557C is a dual LUN autoloader meaning it has the same SCSI ID but different LUNs for the drive and the library. You will define the library as SCSI as you would with other SCSI libraries. The drive is LUN 0 and the library is LUN 1. If this is on Windows and SCSI

Re: TSM on a SAN.

2002-02-01 Thread Kelly Lipp
We recently made this work at one of our sites. No problems. Pretty cool actually. Even taught ourselves how to zone stuff and everything. We did have a problem with a Storage Agent client in the config. I don't know what ever happened with that, though. Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions