smime.p7m
Description: application/pkcs7-mime
Yes, but there are many unsupported clients which work fine. And for many
not-so-popular OSes the client is not available for the current version.
In fact TSM is not very multi-platform, ADSM was. TSM can just use ADSM
clients. My opinion, nobody else's.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please
Just a point
TCPWindowsize parameter is measured in kilobytes not bytes. And according
to Administrator's reference it must be between 0 and 2048. If not in
range on client complains with ANS1036S for invalid value. On server
values out of range mean 0, i.e. OS default.
However this are side
Thanks for information. Have a nice weekend!
Wolfgang
There is no remote client like the TSM web client for the TDPs.
We know about the requirement and it is logged in our
requirements database. It is on our list of things to do.
Until then, you will need to use remote utilities like
Terminal
Hi List, I`ve been trying to install TDP for Oracle for AIX 2.2.1 in a AIX
5.1 box, but I can not make the utility TDPOCONF work, it seems that my
tdpo.opt file is not right but I cant not find where the problem is, when I
issue and tdpoconf showenv or try to set the password I get an ANU 2534E
You can setup backupcopy group to point the disk pool but archive group to
send direct to tape.
Isn't this an option?
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
Reclamation for a Volume does not work, ANR1092W will be showed.
I did a audit vol yesterday.
Today the Volume is not longer under TSM Control !
Do i realy need to call the service representative, like explained in the
message 1092?
How about to clean up the table entry in the TSM DB?
Stephen,
You may add these parameter these will improve speed
The will increase the comm buffers
TXNBYTELIMIT25600
TCPWINDOWSIZE63
-Original Message-
From: Firmes, Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vrijdag 17 mei 2002 0:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slw Novell
Hi:
I would like to know where to get more info about that parameters
(txnbytelimit/txngroupmax/tcpbufsize/etc...) and tuning them (of
course).
Thanks
Ignacio
-Mensaje original-
De: Flemming Hougaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Viernes, 17 de Mayo de 2002 07:59
Para:
Hello,
i'am using TSM client version 4.2.1.20 for several NT4 SP6a and W2K
clusterd environments.
There is no problem with the functionality for backup/archive etc.
But during the scheduled backup for the disks of a cluster group resource
i receive the following
message within the according
Hi all;
It's a question for people who know the products : TSM/HSM
and GPFS (Global
Parallel File System).
It's a problem with HSM : Tivoli Space Manager.
When the product HSM is associated with GPFS , it causes a
great increase of memory utilisation on the machine TSM
server.
In few days, the
Herfried,
yes, he did. Maybe you missed it because this was explained in other
thread (Client shceduler).
If the date is not accepted the server will run as the date/time is not
changed at all and there would be no problem.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor
Backup direct to tape involves the communications. Migration is purely
server process. So its check can eliminate some TCP bottlenecks (if any).
For local client there should be no big difference.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Hello,
does anybody knows how to disable multi-path feature on IBM 3575 library?
I have big troubles with this feature; the id of the lib manager is the same of the
drive 1, and there seems to be communications problem. I'd like to have different ids
and the only way to do it is to disable
Hello,
please could you describe the problem. I am in the middle of an
update to TSM 4.2 and currently I am using the AIX 4.2.2 client
on a couple of boxes.
Bye
Rainer Tammer
On Thu, 16 May 2002 15:16:50 -0700, Jim Smith wrote:
Bob,
We have determined that there is a problem with the 4.2.2
Hello TSMers,
Do you have any idea if a netbackup site like this one exists?
Thanks.
Nicolas Duchêne
Telematics Services Europe
Advanced Technical Services
Secured Storage Services
Boulevard E. Paepsemlaan , 18E
1070 Brussels
Rue du Commandant Naessens, 23
4431 Loncin
BELGIUM
Tel:
I made the tcpip performance changes to the dsm.opt and I am still getting slow
transfer times. I tested via ftp and was able to tranfer 40,000 files in a few
minutes. So it appears that the TSM client is still not working.
here are the stats from my last selective backup:
Total number of
Try moving your TCPBUFFSIZE to 512 instead of 32.
Brandon Eckmann
Network and Technology Services
Wayne State College
Wayne NE.
|-+
| | Firmes, Stephen|
| | Stephen.Firmes@STORAGENE|
| |
Hi all
Firstly let me thank those who helped me out last night getting my server
back up after the recovery log filled.much better than IBM support...!
I have found the culprit that caused the log to fill. It seems that when
the incremental backups are running for a win2k cluster the log
How much of this data are you trying to send direct to tape? That's what it looks like
your includes are trying to do, and that will obviously be slower that going to disk.
Are you ftp'ing to disk but backing up to tape?
I think, to get all the objects (files and folders) in sys: and
I have an admin that is trying to get the TSM client (TSM420_LINUX390.tar.Z)
running on:
3. The version of linux we are using is a 64-bit implementation of red hat
linux 2.4.7 called ThinkBlue. It was done by Millenux which is a partner
with IBM Germany in
its porting and is specifically
I don't know how to go back but when we went from single path to multipath
the ROM chips in the library had to be changed. So I assume that to go back
you have to get single path chips. The robot should be set to a different
lun but same target as a drive. What type of problem are you having?
Make a new device class, set a max drive limit for it, and change your
copypools to use that device class.
Zlatko:
OK: tcpwindowsize is in KBytes (actually my setting is 1280).
I have the same question (why client is idling?).
We have users working on that server from 9:00 until 22:00 (every
day...), backup jobs start about 00:15/01:15
I've monitored the nodes in disk i/o operations and network
Refer to the IBM manual Magstar MP 3575 Tape Library
Dataserver OPERATOR GUIDE GA32-0381. Chap 2 explains
how to change this stuff from the LCD panel.
Also after making changes, halt TSM and restart so it will read
new config. May need to make some OS level changes also
(devices) and
Stephen,
Did you check on the half / full duplex setting on the network card ?
Full-duplex advised
If possible..
Did you also try to backup a large single file size ca 10mb's or larger,
what is the performance then ?
Regards marco
-Original Message-
From: Firmes, Stephen
I am sure TSM will wait. And while we're on this subject, we are looking at
Disaster Recovery plans and the path we must take using TSM to recover a
couple hundred servers. It looks bleak.
We are finding that, due to incremental forever backups, recovery times are
extremely long because of tape
After a very bad manipulation several nodes as well as their associated
filespaces was destroyed.
I make a migration forced with my diskpools on my tapepools every evening
I make a backup of my diskpools on one short_tapepool every evening
I make a copy of my tapepool on one long_tape pool every
Luis,
I apologize, that is a pretty useless message (and not very helpful). But
regardless, I think I can help you out. First off, are you using the
tdpo.opt in the installation directory or are you defining it in your own
directory? To start, I would use default installation directory
It will wait for the tape. Normally that is. If there is a problem with the
tape (access=unavailable for instance) it will skip it. If another client
is currently restoring from this tape, it will wait till tape is free.
If tape is not in library, generally TSM will issue a request for the
And using another backup solution won't result in many tape mounts as well?
TSM might be more mounts than others, but you only have to do one restore.
Remember, not using incremental forever means that you must resotre a
machine at least two times. How about using backup sets if time is that much
Hi, all,
I need to say big thank-you to all of you. Thanks for your advice and
patience with a novice with me. Everything is backing up normally. I'm
learning a lot! Thanks.
Gus.
Jin Bae Chi (Gus)
Data Center
614-287-2496
614-287-5488 Fax
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17/02
I am not privy to why it is not out there, but the AIX 4.2.2 client has
big problems. About 1/3 of all the files it backed up were rejected for
filenme too long. I suspect that is why it is gone.
Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical Specialist
Well, that certainly explains that problem. Does anyone have a word if this
problem is fixed in 5.1? I had plenty of people reporting that problem with
Linux after upgrading to 4.2.2.
Big whoops!
thanks,
bob
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 10:43:06AM -0500, Andrew Carlson wrote:
I am not privy to
An idea to think about:
We are looking at the possibility of changing our hardware config to take
care of this issue. We are considering MOVING our TSM server out of the
data center into a different building. With today's fiber connections the
technology exists to do that.
The primary pool
AS far as tsm is concerned , when there is no copy pool tape at the
disaster recovery site at time of restore will result
in request of mount tape until it is provided to that site! is this what I'm
hearing? it will skip unless it is unavailable
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: David
I would say that technically, that sounds good. Except for one
thing. How close are the two buildings? I wouldn't want all
my eggs on the same campus.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17/02 12:49PM
An idea to think about:
We are looking at the possibility of changing our hardware config
The problem is reported in IC33645 and is only a problem with the TSM
4.2.2 backup/archive client; it has been addressed in TSM 5.1.0. We are
working to provide more information about the specifics of the problem.
Thanks,
Jim
J.P. (Jim) Smith
TSM Client Development
Well, that certainly
Yes, they are on the same campus.
And I agree, if we were in an earthquake zone, that wouldn't be far enough
away.
But that's really a management decision - what disaster coverage do you
require?
Currently, our copy pool tapes are stored in the other building, and
management believes that
Nikolai Sonin
System Architect
ESI Group
28381 Encina Drive Suite 100
Winters CA, 95694-9007
530-795-0200 ext. 235
Talafous, John G. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/17/2002 07:33 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL
My tape use is going up, but nothing is being reclaimed from my copy pool.
I must have done something wrong, but where do I go to look for whatever is
wrong first?
What am I missing?
I can find nothing in the activity log, and even when I do a
update stg copypool rec=5
and it should
JFYI, there is a new RedBook: Tivoli Storage Manager Version 5.1: Technical Guide.
Here's the link.
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedpieceAbstracts/sg246554.html?Open
Mahesh
AT my DISASTER REC.SITE
we have a smaller lto library as compared to the one on our production
site
if its looking for a tape while restoring and not able to do so, does
it
wait till the tape is mounted before proceeding with the rest of the
client
restore? or does it skips restoring that
Problem Description:
The TSM 4.2.2 UNIX backup-archive clients may produce error messages
similar
to the following when performing incremental backup of files with hard
links:
ANS1228E Sending of object 'filename' failed
ANS4018E Error processing 'filename': file name too
We currently have a 3494 library with two 3490E1A drives
attached to a WinNT4 box running quad Xeon 550's and a gig of RAM. TSM is
version 4.2. We have about 30-40gig of data coming in over about an eight
hour time window each evening and night. Things are fine for now. We are
looking
We have a TSM 4.2.1.9 server running under OS/390. We are about to order
more client licenses. The last time we did this IBM and/or Tivoli required
us to tell them how the new licenses would be divided among different
platforms: how many for Windows NT, how many for AIX, and so on. The
charge per
Thanks, Tim,
What's a Q systemobject? That command doesn't seem to produce anything,
do I have it wrong?
Thanks,
Julie
Rushforth, Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPEG.MB.CA cc:
Nikolai Sonin
System Architect
ESI Group
28381 Encina Drive Suite 100
Winters CA, 95694-9007
530-795-0200 ext. 235
Tyree, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/17/2002 12:21 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL
Jim,
I would like to thank you for publishing this information.
We got bit by the windows client at 4.2.1.20 and 4.2.1.26 failing half way
through a backup because of a locked file and the backup looking successful.
The result was we lost many backups for about 10 days without realizing it.
The
In North Carolina we've been advised that 7 miles is an 'adequate' distance for
off-site storage for DR.
And Wanda, be careful about how you view a 'hurricane zone'! Here in Chapel
Hill, NC we're some 200 miles inland and got whomped by Hurricane Fran in '96.
Power was out on campus for 3 days.
From the Backup/Archive Command line clinet (dsmc), enter q systemobject.
It should show you the last backup date of all system objects.
tsm q systemobject
Size Backup DateMgmt Class A/I File
----- ---
Nikolai Sonin
System Architect
ESI Group
28381 Encina Drive Suite 100
Winters CA, 95694-9007
530-795-0200 ext. 235
Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/17/2002 12:35 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL
Reading thru this thread, no one has mentioned that backup will be slower
than archive -- for TWO significant reasons:
1. The standard progressive-incremental requires alot of work in comparing
the attributes of all files in the affected file systems, especially for a
LARGE number of
Julie,
To add to Tim's comments. The TSM B/A client processes all system
objects which are active on the machine; there are now a total of eleven
of these system objects (added the WMI db support in TSM 5.1.0) of which
only a subset will be valid on a given machine. This subset depends both
Paul (or anyone),
I'm not aware of the problem you ran into. Do you know if it was fixed
in the 4.2.1.30 Windows client? Is there an APAR for this problem that I
could look at? Thanks.
At 04:31 PM 5/17/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Jim,
I would like to thank you for publishing this information.
Jack,
As TSM ages backup and archive data, the files only get 'marked' for
deletion. You must run an EXPIRE INVENTORY command to actually flip the
switch from 'marked' for deletion to deleted. Then your storage pool
reclamation should work.
That is, unless I am missing something too!!! 8-)
'cause there is no published rule how to convert points to processors. I
am trying to find the answer since the announcement of new licensing
scheme but still without success.
Just ask them for NN processors or MM points. In both cases you have the
right to use them on different platforms.
Hi Don,
I looked for incrbydate in the installation guide and reference manual for this
option but haven't found it. Can I use this for Solaris clients?
-Bern Ruelas
Cadence Design Systems - Storage
Sr. Systems Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Don France (TSMnews) [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi, thanks for your help, I`ve tried doing the modifications you suggested
me but with no luck, i keep getting the same messages in the tdpoerror:
ANU2603E The option 9 in file tdpo.opt
ANU2537E Error found while parsing options in TDP for Oracle options file
ANU2534E Option file error
I`m
And while we're on the subject of licenses and upgrades, I was
informed by my reseller that Tivoli has withdrawn the TSM
Enterprise Edition from marketing. All of the constituent parts
are still available, but you can not purchase the bundle. Word is
that it was too confusing to end users. I hope
That may be why we did not see it on all of our clients. It may turn out
that 4.2.1.30 does not have the problem. However, this problem did not crop
up until we put on 4.2.1.15 TSM server.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Paul
61 matches
Mail list logo
