Hi
I have an AIX m/c with 4.3.3. It had Informix 7.24 UC 3 with TSM and TDP for
Informix 3.7.0 and backup was working. I upgraded the Informix to IDS
7.31.FD2X1. Also I upgraded my TSM to 5.1 and TDP for Informix to 4.1 for 64
bit compatibility. I am able to start TSM browser window and able to
Hi there, all you tsm-ers!
I am planning to update the TSM-Server from 4.2.1.11 to 5.1.
Any known problems?
furthermore we will get a new data warehouse machine on friday.
Including FastT via FibreChannel.
The TSM-Library is a 3584 Ultrium LTO Fibrechannel.
I would like to backup the data
Hi Sam,
most likely the tape is not checked in. When you delete data from it, it
returns to scratch, and is no longer defines in a storagepool - which is why
you can't see the volume with q volume. If you can't see the volume with q
libvol, it is normally because it is not checked in. Check this
Hi Michael
It is likely that you miss following option in your opt-file:
passworddir /full path to directory in which you want your file with the
encrypted password to be stored.
TSM Client needs access to this file as well.
Rgds
Geirr G. Halvorsen
-Original Message-
From: Michael
furthermore we will get a new data warehouse machine on friday.
Including FastT via FibreChannel.
The TSM-Library is a 3584 Ultrium LTO Fibrechannel.
I would like to backup the data warehouse directly via FC to tape,
probably sending only the TSM-DB-Info to the TSM-Server. (almost
Dear All,
I'm using TDP for R/3 3.2.0.8 on AIX and I've configured the initXXX.utl
file to use 2 sessions.
My node has been configured on the server for a maximum number of mount
points of 2.
When running a brbackup 2 sessions are started - but they both want to
write to the same tape. The
Dear All,
I have an AIX node with TSM Backup client at 4.2.1.0 and a TSM server on
AIX at 4.2.1.10
I have PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE set in the dsm.sys, and I've set a
PASSWORDDIR.
The first time I attempt to run a dsmc command as root, I'm naturally asked
to provide password details. This works
Trinh, Tony,
Thank you very much!I'm in China.Now about 800 cartridge shill remove from the
library,can I use this operation:
ADSMcheckout libv (library name) volrange=bar001,bar800(if the label is
sequential) remove=yes
Must I backup DB before I do this?
The other thing I
We are experiencing the backup failed 402 error condition nightly on at
least 1 of our Exchange Servers. We are running:
The latest TDP for Exchange
Exchange 5.5 SP4
NT 4 60a
TSM Server
AIX 4.3.3 ML10
TSM 4.2.2.12
Gigabit
The NT hardware is Gigabit
Hi all
Running Solaris Server 4.2.2.12 on a Solaris 2.7 box
I want to NFS mount a partition from one Solaris machine to another and
then have TSM back this file system up. Will TSM automatically backup a
remotely mounted NFS partition or do I have to tell it specifically to do
so.
Many thanks
Hi all,
I have a strange Problem with our W2K-Servers : TSM-Client 4.2.0.0
When starting an interactive Backup-Session I select some Files out of the
explorer-like window for backup (e.g. KERNEL32.DLL from winnt\system32 ).
I start the backup session and it completes without error, but all
Look's like XP is reported as 5.01.
tsm: GASSRV01q node angelor-xp f=d
Node Name: ANGELOR-XP
Platform: WinNT
Client OS Level: 5.01
Client Version: Version 5, Release 1, Level 1.0
Curt Magura
Lockheed Martin EIS
Orlando,
Antony,
Not sure why anyone would want to backup a cache directory (assuming you can even get
it into a quiesced state so you aren't sitting with a fuzzy backup), but...
I believe the archive command has a -quiet option that turns off detailed logging to
the dsmsched.log file. The downside is
Hi
Have the same problem here, but on a Solaris client. TSM support haven't
helped us, but I noticed when we changed the nodename to something shorter
it worked...
A workaroud is to have password in dsm.sys
If you find a solution please let me know
Regards
Niklas
-Original
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
When starting an interactive Backup-Session I select some Files out of the
explorer-like window for backup (e.g. KERNEL32.DLL from winnt\system32 ).
I start the backup session and it completes without error, but all object
Hi all
1. do anybody know of any problems that TSM can not be install with IBM
library with 1 drive only, and must need 2 drives ?
2. is TSM can be install with IBM autoloader ,and how will it function ?
Thanks In Advance
Ofer Vaknin
I believe XP reports NT 5.1
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
W2K is known as NT 5.0 to TSM. Do a q node blah f=d
for your client node on TSM server and
Yes, I know of many problems, running a library with 1 drive.
My advice is DON'T!
I think there are enough problems when you are running TSM with 2 drives -
my recommended minimum is 3 drives.
Good luck!
Geirr G. Halvorsen
-Original Message-
From: Ofer vaknin [mailto:[EMAIL
This could be a collocation issue. Make sure you have collocate=no. The
other piece is what did you set MAX_SESSIONS to.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Eric Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25,
Look into performing an image backup... then it will just be a single TSM
db entry
BUT you only have an all or nothing restore possibility, you won't be able
to just restore a single file out of the file system.
Dwight E. Cook
Software Application Engineer III
Science Applications International
1. You don't need to do a DB backup for this.
2. Suggest first running
q media stg=stgpol_name wherestate=mountableinlib days=10
This will show you how many tapes haven't been accessed in 10 days.
run again changing the days parameter to get the approximate number
of tapes you want/need to
Can anyone share some understanding of the follow issue?
I have several tapes that appear to be grossly under-utilized. Tapes marked
FULL (and even 100% utilized) that have 50GB-60GB capacity figures on a
100GB AIT3 cartridge. Most full tapes show 90-110GB and a few where
compression is good
My XP reports 5.01
-Original Message-
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 25, 2002 7:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
I believe XP reports NT 5.1
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I am running TSM v4.2.2.12 on OS/390 v2.10.
I am seeing the following errors during a backup:
ANR0406I Session 3038 started for node ITXF2ASBEC (WinNT) (BPX-Tcp/Ip
167.64.85.13(3065)).
ANR0103E IMBKINS(2890): Error 2 updating row in table Backup.Objects.
ANR0530W Transaction failed for
Do the under-utilized tape volumes have data that is pre-compressed by
the client? This can cause tapes to appear to be under-utilized.
David
Despite the radically different external names for the NT operating
systems, internally Windows NT 4.0, 2000, and XP are all members of the
Windows NT family of operating systems:
Windows NT 4.0 = NT version 4.0
Windows 2000 = NT version 5.0
Windows XP = NT version 5.1
Similarly, the Windows 9x
I am interested in reading your write-up. Is it complete, and if so, under
what subject? If not, do you have an estimate on when?
Thanks for doing this Gretchen,
Todd
|+
|| Gretchen L. |
|| Thiele |
||
Gang,
Environment: TSM Server V5.1.1.4 on Win2K, TSM Client 5.1.1.0 on Win2K
Fileserver drive.
Data Restoration Statistics:
233,002 Objects
52.54 GB
Elapsed Time: 12:57:01
Other stats appeared quite normal, i.e., Network Data transfer rate.
resourceutilization = 4, Maxnummp = 4
Four
Actually, this problem occurs with both unicode and nonunicode
SYSTEM OBJECT filesystems. If you delete the nonunicode filesystem
it will rebackup as unicode. The new unicode SYSTEM OBJECT
filesystem will continue accumulate extra versions as well.
I could run CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPS with an
Hi all,
I have a 3494 library with 2 drives,now I must checkout some tape from my
library.When I am checkouting these tapes the drives can do backup operation at the
same time?What about the time the library labeling the tape.
Thanks and regards.
feng
Feng,
When you checking out the tapes...I have nothing to do with the drive...The
drives will continue to run
It backup...The robot will move the tapes out of the library after you run
the commands...
Remember, these are live data tapes...(Which means there are data still on
these tapes) Lock
One thing I have seen every now and then, is when a large file spans
multi-volumes, it will only get reported in utilization on one of the tapes,
but when query the contents of volumes, it will show up as on both.
David N. Reiss
TSM Support Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
407-736-3912
-Original
Joel,
It's looks like CLEANUP BACKUPGROUP does a partial online auditdb fix=yes. Also the
APAR's listed below looks like the problem i'm having with AUDITDB so it's a good
prelude to this weekend's auditdb.
john
APAR= IC33977 SER=IN INCORROUT
THREADID0 ERROR 8
Hello all,
need some help, we were told that in order to get TDS completely working,
in the sense to report all it said it reports in a readable format. We
need to be at a higher version of TSM than at what we are which is 4.2.20
on Solaris 2.8 64bit
We have seen some other bugs covered, if we
1. Nothing wrong with it per say.. It works great. You'll have to allocate
some disk space for your reclamation pool but in my experience it works
well. Also there are the obvious limitations that having only 1 drive
presents such as when someone requests a restore, if their data is on tape
and
Migrations can be delayed by setting the thresholds to 100 and the storage
pool reclamation to 100.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL
One additional consideration - you cannot do a proper job of DR protection
if you really only have 1 drive. For your copy storage pool, you will need
an additional drive in order to do offsite reclamation. The drive doesn't
have to be the same technology. I have a customer who is using an LTO
Hm. If the contents are useless, would there be a problem with deleting the
volume discarddata=yes and then redefining the volume? I've found
redefining volumes is so fast as to be inconsequential, but I use raw lv's.
Why wouldn't you want to delete the volume and redefine it?
Alex Paschal
I would install the ver1 package, cp the code directory to another
directory, and then install the ver2 package, then test both. Don't know if
it'll work, but it's worth a shot. I mean, your package manager isn't like
the Windows Registry, right? So I figure the chance of it working is pretty
Additionally, I've seen this on a bad tape. If you audit a tape and get a
lot of damaged files, it lists each one to the actlog and can slam the
actlog to the point where nothing gets posted to it anymore. The same can
happen during tape-tape migration, reclamation, move data, backup stg, etc,
Create a client schedule in each domain that does absolutely nothing at,
say, 3:00 PM with a duration of 10 minutes, and associate all your nodes to
it. (Or better yet, have it run a script that forks, sleeps so the
scheduler can report completion, then bounces the scheduler. Heh, heh.)
Then
Has anybody successfully used the AUTOMOUNT option in a client
options file, along with the 'DOMAIN all-auto-nfs' statement?
Regardless of what I choose in my AUTOMOUNT directive, I receive
the following error message:
09/25/02 16:55:21 Filesystem /studio/sin/mstr/general is no
automounted
many thanks for the response! Infact in our case, it seems more to what
Paul has mentioned below, we had the TSM server loosing element inventory
information lately in which case the drives were going offline.
A *mttest* came back with junk numbers, and subsequent tests came back
correctlty.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Thomas A. La Porte wrote:
Has anybody successfully used the AUTOMOUNT option in a client
options file, along with the 'DOMAIN all-auto-nfs' statement?
Regardless of what I choose in my AUTOMOUNT directive, I receive
the following error message:
09/25/02 16:55:21
It is called:
Artificial, non-intelligent, unrelated resource locking
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Chetan H. Ravnikar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Chetan H. Ravnikar wrote:
tell me what you want to achive and I will try and help you.
I had the same probelm to get autmount working on solaris-2.8 and TSM
4.2.20. Infact never got it to work., But I have a workarround.
In my environment, I have a design to backup
Does anyone have any experience with TSM and Netware clustering. Does TSM
support the backup of the Netware cluster.
Thank You
John Stephens
Hi all,
I have a 3494 library with two dirve,the backup-archive server with ADSM .When the
library must label 200 tapes a time,at the same time ADSM must have backup some
date,can these two operations be doing at the same time?
Another question is if I take the opertion:
ADSMlabel libvol
Hi,
ITSM can be very much be installed with one drive either in Library or
autoloader or a stand alone drive. Even ITSM can be installed without any
drive also.
Install and see yourself any issues we are all here.
Best Regards
Prashant Gadikar
Ofer vaknin
3570 users,
I notice that IBM is withdrawing all 3570 items from marketing in December
2002.(announcemet letter WG02-0316)
Looks like time to consider an upgrade if you are using these. IBM suggests Ultrium
as the replacement, but that hardly has a six second load time does it?
Regards
Hello
On Donnerstag, 26. September 2002 05:31, fenglimian wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 3494 library with two dirve,the backup-archive server with ADSM
.When the library must label 200 tapes a time,at the same time ADSM must
have backup some date,can these two operations be doing at the same
51 matches
Mail list logo
