The API appeared to pick these logs up from the restore folder
automatically, I didn't do anything differently except copy the log files
after the applylogs command was issued.
The log files were read and then deleted from the restore folder after
they were applied...one by one. So it is
I have a question about to delete special Filespaces :
If i have a filespacename call /data/test , how can i delete seperate
files under this filespacename.
I want not to delete the filespace. I want only delete filespaces under
this
filespacename.
Must i do it with an sql command ?
Bye
Frank
Paul, you wouldn't happen to know off hand the APAR for the horrible
mirroring bug, would you?
tia
lisa
Seay, Paul
seay_pd@NAPTH To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EON.COM cc:
Sent by: Subject:
Bingo!
That's what I was looking for. Thanks for your response...guess I didn't
look deep enough.
-Lloyd
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:30:45 -0500
Allen Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little off base? Yes and no. My CE will gladly do FMR microcode
updates (for a fee). You can download them
Marc
Sorry to hammer this home, but ...
I didn't do anything differently except copy the log files
after the applylogs command was issued.
I'm guessing that what you're saying is that
- you issue the applylogs command
- the command waits until you copy a log file into the folder
- it applies
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Seay, Paul
Think for a second, if reclaimation supported a days option versus the
current percent utilized option. If that was the case you could set that
number of days about 7 days less than when the closed boxes are to
Does anyone please please please have the partnummber for the brackets that
come with a 3590 tapeunit.
They are the ones needed to screw the unit into the library.
apparently u can order the entire drive in losse parts, but I cant find the
brackets anywhere. :(
michelle
When I went through my upgrade from 3590E to 3590H, the CE was required,
per his instructions, to update the firmware on the drives. The new
hardware came with the firmware on tape. Sorry to say, but your CE is
not following the instructions in the Upgrade Manual for doing this
conversion.
Interesting . . . I called in a PMR on the day I posted the message and
I have yet to hear from support - in spite of a request for update (via
the web and phone). Thanks for the heads up; I'll watch out for the
fix.
Mahesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/23/02 01:23AM
Hello Mahesh
I've reported this
I can give you the numbers because we needed them ourselves a couple of
weeks ago.
Just give me a minute to dig them up.
Ilja.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Michelle Wiedeman [mailto:michelle.wiedeman;MULTRIX.COM]
Verzonden: woensdag 23 oktober 2002 14:31
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:06 AM -0500 10/23/02, Chris Gibes said:
You are absolutely correct. Co-location is by storage pool, not by
management class. So yes, you would need to carve your disk up into
multiple storage pools to selectively use co-location,
Thanks for the confirmation
my guess is that it's
not
With this specific restore...around 200 logs were applied before it
required the logs I had on disk...so as soon as I started the log
restoreI then copied the logs into the specified restore folder. By
the time the restore needed the logs that were on disk, everything had
already been copied
Hi all
Hoping you can point me in the right direction with this...alas my exchange
knowledge is next to none existent.!
I have configured a windows 2000 exchange cluster all backing up to TSM no
probs. This cluster exchange server is server04.
Another standalone Exchange server has been built
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
chris rees
Hoping you can point me in the right direction with this...alas
my exchange
knowledge is next to none existent.!
I have configured a windows 2000 exchange cluster all backing up to TSM no
probs. This cluster
With this specific restore...around 200 logs were applied before it
required the logs I had on disk...so as soon as I started the log
restoreI then copied the logs into the specified restore folder. By
the time the restore needed the logs that were on disk, everything had
already been
Hello,
We have been getting some error messages in the dsmerror.log while doing
some database backups. I was wondering if someone can point me to where I
can find more information about this messages:
In the dsmerror.log, we get:
10/23/02 04:05:17 ANS4014E Error processing
Steve,
I see a need for a correction here: IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for
Databases, Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 (at 2.2.1), this is what
Tivoli is calling it now, does support Oracle 9i and has since the release
of 2.2.1. If this is information that you received from us, please tell me
Joe,
Not sure what version of TDP for Oracle you are using, but with TDP Oracle
2.2.1 we actually send 2 messages to the TSM Server activity log that you
may find useful:
ANU2535I File /fs/ll/backuppiece = number of bytes sent. (This denotes a
successful backup)
ANU2536I File /fs/ll/backuppiece
Would someone please explain to me what these settings will mean to me as
it
relates to TDP for domino backups? The schedule is below. Is there going
to
be 45 versions of each type of backup or what? I'm told they want to be
able
to go back 45 days. I'm not sure how this should be set up
Neil,
Is TDP for Oracle 9i (9.0.1) also supported on W2K platform? Tivoli
Website doesn't indicate so.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
If all else fails --
I have several small Oracle databases (in the 10 to 15 GB size) and we just
shut them down for 40 minutes or so nightly and back up the filesystems.
Archive the file systems, that is. If you can afford the shutdown, and if
the backup/archive doesn't run too long, this may be
Thanks to everyone for their input on my *old* Oracle and TDP issues.
It seems that from the docs, the 2.2.1 version of the TDP for Oracle on
NT/2K *ONLY* supports RMAN (at least that is what the book says).
However, I have found the 2.1.1.0 version of this TDP on the Tivoli FTP
site and the
A followup on the problems with NDS with the all-local command (we're
talking Netware here). APAR IC34798 has been issued on this. The work
around is to include the colon after the NDS specification. i.e: DOMAIN
ALL-LOCAL NDS: works.
Now, on to configuring for a cluster!
--
Jim Kirkman
AIS -
If it's an O/S error, which I'm not sure if it is or not you may want to
look in the system header file.
--Justin
Villegas,
BeatriceTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
M
This page should answer some 'Does this support this' questions..
http://www1.ibmlink.ibm.com/cgi-bin/master?xh=7dxmCUAqShNLdC2USenGnN9332req
uest=announcementsparms=H%5f202%2d276xfr=N
Matthew Large
TSM Infrastructure Engineer
Lavington Street
Int: 7430 4995
Ext: +44 207 902 4995
I will be trying to make the locked canister based approach work using
the move data commands. I will record which volumes are in which
containers and after a set period of time, I will move all data left on
these tapes onto tapes in the next canister.
I see value in a locked canister
What version of the TSM client are you running? I remember some of the
early 3.1 and 3.7 clients had issues with releasing memory (not sure
about pegging the CPU though).
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert
IE is not a requirement for the backup-archive client.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Joshua,
TSM client version is currently 5.1
crg
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Bassi [mailto:jbassi;IHWY.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NT 4.0 100% CPU Usage
What version of the TSM client are you running? I remember some of
Hello, all!
Can anyone tell me where I can get a hold of the 3494 [SNMP] MIB? I
have tried the IBM website with no luck.
TIA
Mahesh
Hi Kevin,
Most people have only 2 policy sets for each policy domain - the acitve and
the inactive one.
I suggest you make a new management class:
* In the NOCODOM policy domain, create a new management class, for
example call it SYSOBJ_MAN
* Edit the BACKUP COPY GROUP for that new
5.1.1.0 or 5.1.0.0?
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
We've toyed with using a disk pool based on devclass devtype=file. The
upside is this pre-allocation problem is not an issue. The downside is the
definition for the device class doesn't allow you to specify multiple
devices. So there needs to be some way to aggregate your devices into one
big
Correct me if I am wrong, but this will only change the management class
for the backups after the changes are made. All of the other systemobjects
that exist in the database that are managed by the old management class
will be retained for their 60 days. In order to facilitate the move to the
Hello all,
I am running TSM 5.1.1.4 on z/OS 1.1 and can not seem to be able
to delete some old WIN2K clients. I have to delete the old file spaces
first but am failing when I try to get rid of the SYSTEM OBJECTS. My
results look like...
DELETE FILESPACE SYSTEM OBJECT (fsId=2) for
Hello, all.
I'm looking at replacing all of my IBM 3570 tape libraries with 3583
libraries, and looking to hear from anyone who has experience with the
3583, particularly on Windows servers. Our experience with the 3570 has
been less than pleasant at times. I'd like to hear about any good or
From Richard Sims' ADSM/TSM Quick Facts
(http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir)
3494 SNMP support The 3494 (beginning with Library Manager
code 518) supports SNMP alert messaging,
enabling you to monitor 3494 operations
Try to run the 'delete filespace nodename * which should get everything
for the node including the System Objects.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831)
I have installed a dozen 3583 tape libraries and they all have worked
well. The SCSI based drive interface is much easier to setup, but I
believe long-term the native Fibre Channel interface is the way to go.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant -
I have been using a 3583 with 2 drives connected to a SAN Data Gateway. I
haven't had any problems except reclamation of copypools if you still have
data on disk. Reclamation from disk to LTO is VERY slow. If you are used
to holding data on disk all the time your reclamation can take a lot
Great! Thanks for the quick reply!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jbassi;IHWY.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please advise: IBM 3583 tape drives
I have installed a dozen 3583 tape libraries and they all have worked
Top of message
-- 10-23-02 10:41 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)can't delete old node bec
You might check apar PQ60979 (fixed in PTF UQ69897). Here is partial
text:
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
TSM server may not be able to delete a filespace
if there
Wow! Thanks a million for the info!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ebrodeur;SERTI.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please advise: IBM 3583 tape drives
I have been using a 3583 with 2 drives connected to a SAN Data
There really is no MIB, except the standard informational, lists contact,
location, and phone number. The MIB information can be found under
Commands - SNMP options on the management console.
The 3494 only supports SNMP traps (messaging), which means it will send a trap
to any host you specify
After looking at the product on the web, it looks mostly geared to the DR of
HP, Microsoft and Sun systems. No Mac support, no AIX support.. Looks like
a typical HP product. (bloatware, but that is my opinion).
bob
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:42:54PM -0400, Etienne Brodeur wrote:
Does anyone
For the traps to work right, one would need to define the traps on the
management console. It'd be easier to have a MIB file, use NetView's
mib2trap utility, and then import the trap definitions into NetView
instead of having to define each trap manually.
Mahesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/23/02
If it is anything like OmniBack, I can understand why it's not very
prevalent in production. I have several accounts I have moved from
OmniBack to TSM. Needless to say the customers were very impressed with
the TSM product set after the implementation was completed.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM
I will be trying to make the locked canister based approach work using
the move data commands. I will record which volumes are in which
containers and after a set period of time, I will move all data left on
these tapes onto tapes in the next canister.
Using move data commands this way will
Actually, there are only 'levels' of traps you can define on the console. The
rest is up to the 3494. You can set a level that will spam a trap whenever the
I/O door is opened, to only emergency traps. It is a very simple configuration
that works great for us, as long as you have a trap
Hello *SMers
Forwarding a message from a memeber of my team, we seem to have some
problmes configuring TSM SNMP on Solaris 8, any one done this before
Any info is muchly appreciated
Below is the error message I get when I configure the snmp.
I need the know what's the enterprise OID for
The new IBM/Tivoli Storage Manager pages are now Circular, and have been
that way for days.
We RELY on the web pages to do client downloads.
DOES ANYBODY KNOW who we can call to get this mess straigtened out?!?
I've had people from Tivoli asking ME how to get to the downloads page -
THIS IS
Joshua,
5.1.0.0
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Bassi [mailto:jbassi;IHWY.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NT 4.0 100% CPU Usage
5.1.1.0 or 5.1.0.0?
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant
Amen. I used to get the clients from the Boulder FTP site and even that has
not worked for a few weeks now. I'm sure glad I kept the clients I
downloaded on my local hard drive else I would not have been able to get
anything done this week!
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda
Hoping you can point me in the right direction with this...alas my
exchange
knowledge is next to none existent.!
I have configured a windows 2000 exchange cluster all backing up to TSM
no
probs. This cluster exchange server is server04.
Another standalone Exchange server has been built called
I don't know if this will solve the problem, but I would highly
recommend upgrading to at least 5.1.1.0 if not one of the 5.1.1.x
patches.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage,
I downloaded the AIX server v5151 yesterday, I can navigate the site today.
ftp index.storsys.ibm.com
Connected to serviceb.boulder.ibm.com.
220 serviceb.boulder.ibm.com FTP server (Version wu-2.6.2(1) Mon Dec 3
15:26:19 MST 2001) ready
User (serviceb.boulder.ibm.com:(none)): ftp
331 Guest login
I don't have any trouble going to the FTP site, THANK GOODNESS!!
I'm talking about the Tivoli web pages on the IBM support site.
A lot of new users are not ready to navigate the FTP site and figure out
patch/fix levels on their own; we have taught many support people to start
with the Tivoli web
I think that may be because all of the functionality at Tivoli.com has been
(or soon will be completely) replaced with functionality at IBM.com. I
received several emails over the last month regarding this last week, and I
think Friday, Oct. 18 was officially the last day we were to try to use
I hear your frustration. They have fragmented it in the typical IBM
non-intuitive way.
The Support Downloads is playing magic roundabout. So you have to go to
the client requirement pages.
The client requirements/search page has separated the platforms by age
and their is no hyperlinks to the
well have had a few minutes to check out the NEW website and I will say this,
It is an obvious ploy by IBM to force TSM users to register with them to be able to
download and updates/fixes.
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
go there
select
Hi
anyone know, how one can have a client point to a different management
class other than the default on WIN platforms!
I understand on a unix, which is an entry in the include_exclude file
thanks for the info
Chetan
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/search.wss?rs=663tc=SSGSG7dc=D400
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/
Same exact way, include in the OPT file or inc_exc file..
Ryan Miller
Principal Financial Group
Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1
-Original Message-
From: Chetan H. Ravnikar [mailto:Chetan.Ravnikar;SYNOPSYS.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:29 PM
To:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:38, Slag, Jerry B. wrote:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/search.wss?rs=663tc=SSGSG7dc=D400
And when you filter 'All Supported Versions' + 'Client' you get ;
No documents match your query
Please revise your search criteria
But if you use 'All Versions',
Prather, Wanda wrote:
The new IBM/Tivoli Storage Manager pages are now Circular, and have been
that way for days.
We RELY on the web pages to do client downloads.
DOES ANYBODY KNOW who we can call to get this mess straigtened out?!?
I've had people from Tivoli asking ME how to get to the
I have DIRMC specified for a couple of clients which reside in two
different domains. I noticed today that the pool to which this manage-
ment class points contains not just data from the clients which
specified DIRMC, but from several clients as well.
The directory management class has the same
Does not exist.
Turn SNMP and write a lot of Netview script.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Tailor [mailto:MTailor;CARILION.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slightly off the
Actually, our issues had nothing to do with old backup methodology. Cost of
open storage was a concern but we would have probably been OK with that.
The real issue is if a 3590K tape is dropped, the chances of it being
readable are bordering on slim and none, same is true for LTO and 9840. The
It depends!
Not all RAID-5 is created equal. NT software RAID-5 is a dog and for that
fact all software RAID-5 solutions are questionable.
IBM ESS under the covers RAID-5 is insulated by the controllers in the ESS,
so you do not care about it.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon
We probably have fewer tapes than you do, but we have two cases LTO cases
for our offsite tapes - up to 20 tapes per case.
They rotate on-site daily. While onsite, we put a 'disaster floppy' and a
full DB backup into the case along with any on-site copypool tapes. We pull
the
previous 'disaster
Neil,
Thanks for the feedback. I will investigate and find out where the DBAs
received the info.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Rasmussen [mailto:rasmussn;US.IBM.COM]
Sent: 23 October, 2002 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oracle and TDP issues
Steve,
I see a need for a
Hi Matt,
I had a similar problem using the GUI with 5.1.1.0 on AIX 5.1.
I ended up using the command line instead of the GUI and it worked fine.
-Original Message-
From: MC Matt Cooper (2838) [mailto:Matt.Cooper;AMGREETINGS.COM]
Sent: 24 October, 2002 1:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would say that RAID5 is definitely the problem. We have seen the same
thing.
Our config is to place the db and log volume on RAID1 (mirror) drives and
the storage pools vols on JBOD disks.
I was astonished by the performance difference. And this was with hardware
RAID5.
Paul is absolutely
As to your db issue, all I can say is ouch.
You haven't said what kind of library (and how many drives), or how big
your potential collocated backup is, but a possible option would be to
set up a collocated tape pool and then a management class that points
directly to that pool. Then specify that
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Frank Ruff
If i have a filespacename call /data/test , how can i delete seperate
files under this filespacename.
I want not to delete the filespace. I want only delete filespaces under
this
filespacename.
There are no
I escalated this to the TSM Product Manager in San Jose. He is following
up with the developers of the Web Site.
I also sent a note to the FEEDBACK mechanism and was told that some of
the problems could be due to the Browser I was running. They now only
support Internet Explorer. If you use
I just saw this pass by on the screen and thought I'd send it off. This
morning I upgraded the TSM Server to 5.1.5.1, it's on AIX 4.3.3. Don't
recall ever seeing this error before so thought I'd ask. It is just a
standard backup, no TDP going on.
10/23/02 20:09:43 ANRD bfcreate.c(1906):
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:Wanda.Prather;JHUAPL.EDU]
The new IBM/Tivoli Storage Manager pages are now Circular, and have been
that way for days.
We RELY on the web pages to do client downloads.
DOES ANYBODY KNOW who we can call to get this mess straigtened out?!?
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
Include-exclude is supported on windows as well.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Chetan H. Ravnikar [mailto:Chetan.Ravnikar;SYNOPSYS.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mgmt class
Hi
Hi,
I use the following script to get info out of my tsm servers:
dsmadmc -tab -outfile -id=??? -password=??? $* |tail +8|awk 'length 0'|grep
-v ANS8002I
Put this in a script and you can use it like:
yourscript q node xyz
or (if you need wildcards)
echo q event * * | yourscript
it strips
Recently I did also a migration of an ADSM 3.1 to an TSM 5.1 at one of our
customers. I did not have to migrate the database because they decided to start
from scratch with this new environment (other box, other robot, other TSM). Some
of the clients did not accept the TSM 5.1 client because of
Hi All
Not sure how many times this has been talked about, but is there a
definitive answer.
Last year (and the year before) we had a problem with just one of our NT
boxes doing a full backup after the clocks changed. This is a big box and
took a long time and had a big impact on the Db usage.
Hi All Again
I am a little confused about how restores are handled. Here is my
confusion.
We run TSM 4.2.2.12 on a Solaris 2.7 machine.
So, we have a Solaris client backed up in its entirety (OS, data etc). If
we lose the machine we must firstly rebuild the OS. Then, when we come to
restore
Added to the email below, we are currently trying to do a full restore of a
Windows 2000 machine using client level 4.2.2.8 (It's only a test machine).
The restore consists of the c:\ drive and also the System Objects. When we
run the restore, the machine reboots without any warning. Is this
I've found that this is possible to restore a database with the log files
placed back in the restore area as you say. I did also find that I had to
copy these log extents into the folder after issuing the applylogs
command, a NOTES.RIP file was created if the log files were already there.
Marc
I've found that this is possible to restore a database with the
log files placed back in the restore area as you say.
I did also find that I had to copy these log extents into the
folder after issuing the applylogs command, a NOTES.RIP file
was created if the log files were already
86 matches
Mail list logo
