Hi Andy,
I tried different pages (TSM, main page, etc.), also links from the IBM
website. And it didn't worked for me until I went to bed (around 02:00 am
CET) but now it's up again.
:-)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With best regards,
Bien amicalement,
CU/2,
Hi,
you can download the v5.1.5.0 base level from the IBM Partnerworld for
Software site if you have an account.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With best regards,
Bien amicalement,
CU/2,
Dirk Billerbeck
Dirk Billerbeck
GE CompuNet Kiel
Enterprise Computing
Hi,
I want to know if the same command is available on other platforms ,like
AIX and Solaris. Another thing is: when I try
to run these commands to capture the output ( as I can give
sql queries using these commands) through java it just hangs.
On dos prompt it works fine like:
wzrdhlpr.exe
If you liked that old Client Code web page, which was concise and pretty
easy to use, it just got updated - despite promises that it wouldn't be
maintained. When the train first wrecked a little over a week ago, that
page was still from July. There are now up-to-date links to all the new
client
do you know how long it takes to restore a site like www.tivoli.com??
ilovit
At 09:36 1-11-2002 +0100, you wrote:
Sounds like IBM/Tivoli could need some external help for setting up their
network environment... Maybe they should look into the yellow pages? =8-
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met
Sounds like IBM/Tivoli could need some external help for setting up their
network environment... Maybe they should look into the yellow pages? =8-
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Met vriendelijke groeten,
With best regards,
Bien amicalement,
CU/2,
Dirk Billerbeck
Dirk Billerbeck
GE
Friemel, Norbert wrote:
is anybody able to connect to the Tivoli website??
The connection attempt times out and the error message says
something like
www.tivoli.com has no DNS entry???
Try http://216.140.178.15
Norbert Friemel
Temporary glitch? Works fine today (Didn't work yesterday
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:03:31PM -0500, Jason A. Specland wrote:
The secondary DNS server, auth02.ns.uu.net, which is supposed to be
authoritative for tivoli.com, isn't. It's pointing people back at
a.root-servers.net and company.
This is a lovely illustration of why you should make sure
Hi,
this is the link to the IBM Partnerworld for Software:
http://www-100.ibm.com/partnerworld/software/pwswpub1.nsf
Click on enter the Business Partner Zone Web Site and search for Tivoli
Storage Manager. The v5.1.5.0 base level for Linux can be downloaded from
there. At least this is what I
I have seen this behavior in other areas of the web interface on 4.2.1.15.
An example is creating storage pools with a - in the name.
I haven't seen a crash from it.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:bill.boyer;VERIZON.NET]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL
Mark Stapleton wrote:
There is no ftp site for base-level server code, which 5.1.5 is for TSM.
Isn't this the base level code for 5.1.5?
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/server/v5r1/AIX/LATEST
Folks we appreciate your comment on the subject on how to setup network and
servers for web services. However, the problem was in the ISP network
that caused us the problem. We are still working with the ISP to try to
return us back to normal service.
We appreciate your assistance in
Yes! An old APAR cover's this issue, see below. When you are running
offsite reclamation watch the throughput when it is reading from disk as
opposed to reading from tape. It just crawls.
Apar IC15925:
ERROR DESCRIPTION
During
Solaris 2.6 / TSM 4.1.2 (I know..we're upgrading to Solaris 8 ,
TSM 5.1 very soon!)
DB - 50GB, PctUtil 78%
Log - 4GB, LogMode=Normal, PctUtil=1%
DISKPOOL - 138GB, PctUtil 87%, PctMigr 39% (currently)
We're getting migration process failures. We start 4 migration
From experience slow Offsite reclamation from Disk applies to DLT tape also.
It applies to all tape, it basically copies files one at a time. See
IC15925.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:stapleto;BERBEE.COM]
Sent: October 31, 2002 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
We have one server that keeps failing backup with a User abort message,
though this is not the case. Any ideas as to what could cause this or what
I can do to correct it?
NLA
Gundersen Lutheran
La Crosse, WI
Need more information. What client OS/platform ? What TSM client
level ?
For instance, I had these errors after upgrading some clients:
ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 19. Reason 32.
Then I found this in the 5.1.5.2 FIXTEST readme:
* IC34566 CLIENT BACKUP HANGS AND SESSION
Hi,
When I execute the command on MSDOS prompt it writes the output to the
file murali but when I do the same through java code as shown at end it does
not write and it does not give any erros either. Any thoughts? (I tried to
capture the console output without redirecting to a file first. But
DRM is included with the product. What you have to do is call your Tivoli
(BRepresentative for a trial.
(B
(BPaul D. Seay, Jr.
(BTechnical Specialist
(BNaptheon Inc.
(B757-688-8180
(B
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: fenglimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
(BSent: Friday, November
We're getting these at 4.20 on W2K.
An unload/reload/audit doesn't fix these (at least not for us!).
We are only getting these (so far) for 5.11 clients.
We've done a test upgrade to 5.1.5.1 with our prod DB. We get less errors
now (only the ANR0104E's). I've got a problem open with IBM on
We have 2-3581 tape drives (which hold 7 tapes each) attached to an NT
server running TSM and
we are trying to create a copy of our backup tapes.
We would like to preload the backup tapes to allow the copy process to run
in the evenings in an
unattended mode.
We have a problem knowing what
The number of objects backed up (11,854) does not match the # of objects
restored (2687+1122) so you are not comparing the same thing.
Does the backup include NDS? To do an accurate comparison, only backup VOL1
and VOL2.
-Original Message-
From: Vin Yam [mailto:vyam;QBCT.COM]
Sent:
If you have the TSM server installed, the DRM component is part of the base
install.
You don't have to download or install anything else.
-Original Message-
From: fenglimian [mailto:fenglimian;163.COM]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: where can I
I have one Novell server that is failing to back up regularly. A user
abort appears erroneously in the log. Any ideas?
n.
Hmm.
I've only got one doamin, but I have 10 stgpools -- this lets me split data
between local only (no D/R requirement, no copy to offsite pools) and
recoverable. It also lets me keep the off-site recoverable split for ease of
recovery and volume reclaim.
I could simplify a little bit by being
Yes, but gone is that nice page with a table that had all the OS's down the
left side, the OS version across the top and the supported version and
patches of TSM that would support the OS level. Or I just can't find it in
the new and improved site. I used to be able to go there for a quick look
to
ESR (Electronic Service Request) will be unavailable for part (or possibly
all) of the change widow from Sat Nov 2 6:30 to 9:00AM EST.DB2 fail
over testing is being done to improve the recovery processes, during
unplanned outages.Please use voice reporting for any product support
problems,
Roger,
I could go on and on, so I will just say that reliable dot zero releases
are the exception rather than the rule, here in the real world.
I understand what you're saying and largely agree. But in TSM's case that
would be the x.x.0.0 release. And history has shown those to be pretty
much
How would you prevent the following problem/scenario from occuring?
One client
Two separate instances
Each instance has a DB by the same name.
e.g.Client1
InstX has a DBa
InstY has a DBa
If you issue a q fi of InstX's DBa, you can see IntY's filespace. How can you prevent
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:john.naylor;SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO.UK]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1.5.1 backups last night
There have been some problems with resource waiters and locks.
It might be worth upping your
All,
We are evaluating different products to backup oracle database online,
testing SQL-backtrack for oracle from BMC and some other products.
We don't have any information on TDP as such how does it work and how
complex it is to configure with RAMN. If anyone out there using TDP.. Can
you
Hello
In Mac OS (Classic if you like, but not under Mac OS X), TSM appears
to be using a preferences file entitled TSM Backup Preferences. Yet
at the same time, it also uses a file entitled TSM Preferences. I
wonder if anyone knows the relationship between these two files?
Mikael
At 13:08 -0600 11/1/02, Tab Trepagnier wrote:
I understand what you're saying and largely agree. But in TSM's case that
would be the x.x.0.0 release. And history has shown those to be pretty
much uniformly bad.
It's the reported poor quality of the maintenance releases intended to fix
THOSE
So far, I haven't had any major issues with 4.2.3.0 on Win2k. Over the
next couple weeks, I'll be putting other platforms (AIX, HP-UX) to the
same version. I'll let you know how it goes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:msimpson;UKY.EDU]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002
MAXIMUMSGLIST is case sensitive. I think it is mixed case.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Markus Veit [mailto:markus.veit.mv;BAYER-AG.DE]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lanfree with AIX
We haven't used the TDP here, but our DBA's have played with RMAN, and
below is what they have to say.
-Original Message-
From: Chastain, Matt /wich
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 15:58
To: Miller, Paul /wich
Subject: RE: solution for Oracle DB hot baclkups
RMAN is quite clunky
Greetings, TSMers!
Since the new 3590 H1A Tape upgrades have been out for a while now, is there
also a new tape capacity that holds more than the K-type media?
Just checking because the H1A drives are writing 384 tracks to a cartridge
capable of 180 GB w/ 3:1 compression!
Thanks in advance!
--
I'm seeing this quite a bit on a very busy 4.2.2.13 server - and sometimes
at about the same time we see ANS1301E on the client along with an ANE4987E
with file from the \WINNT\system32\ directory.
My suspicion is that what's happening is that a file that is now considered
a system object is
(Thanks! This discussion is exactly what I wanted.)
= On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:05:11 -0600, Fred Johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm with Wanda on this. I've got 36 domains but only 8 stgpools on 2 servers.
Well, some of my clients want colocation, some don't. Some of them want
offsites,
Tim,
I guarantee that the problem still exists in 4.1.5.0.
After seeing my TSM system take 12 hours to reclaim 100 MB of copypool
data I used that APAR as a reference and changed my directory disk pool to
FILE volumes. The performance improvement was dramatic. I use DLT 8000
for copypool, and
40 matches
Mail list logo
