I would suspect that your problem is with RedHat 9.
RedHat 9 is different to all the earlier RedHats, in the RedHat
implemented a different threading methodology in the kernel. (Hence
everyday Java doesnt run either.)
I would back down to at least RedHat 8 - but preferably RedHat 7.2 or
RedHat
Hi,
check the server error log file:
find / -name dsmserv.err
cd tsm_server_dir
more dsmserv.err
Kind regards,
Krzysztof Murkowski
--
Krzysztof Murkowski
PF3 - Informationssysteme
VOLKSWAGEN Pozna Sp.z o.o.
ul. Warszawska 349
61-060 Pozna
Telefon + 48 (61) 8761 706
Telefax + 48 (61) 8761 475
Mark
I have a customer running a 3583 who also needed more tapes and did not want
to pay more for IBM tapes. He instead went for Sony LTO tapes. The
interesting thing is that the read/write errors always seem to be with the
IBM tapes and never with the Sony tapes.
Rgds
Mark
- Original
Look in the Windows Client manual for returncodes:
RC 8: The operation completed with at least one warning message. For
scheduled events, the status will be Completed. Review dsmerror.log (and
dsmsched.log for scheduled events) to determine what warning messages were
issued and to assess their
Fernando,
in fact the only way seems to use the GUI client. It would be interesting to
know what the GUI generates as restore commands internally ?
Maybe Andy Raybeck could comment...
yours
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business
Gerhard,
yes : ANR7837S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected indicates full log space.
Here is our receipt:
-prepare a new logvolume (100 MB are enough) : dsmfmt -m -log
'new_log-vol-name' 100
-start the Server with :
cd $DSMSERV_DIR
dsmserv extend
One consideration to make here is that the IBM recommendation for Fibre LTO
drives is no more the 2 per HBA. Although taking into consideration that
this was with LTO1 drives on 1Gb FC HBAs, I would assume you could get away
with up to four LTO1 drives per 2Gb FC HBA, but only 2 LTO2 drives per
Hello,
I am looking at using a hand-held barcode reader to audit all the Magstar MP tapes
that my company has.
The supplier of the hand-held device has asked me what barcode type do the MP tapes
use ?
I have no idea, and cannot find any reference to the type used in any of the 3570
manuals.
Hi TSMers
Ok, my questions about the 4.2 to 5.1 upgrade are prolly getting boring,
but I always like to make sure I've asked every silly question I can so as
not to get caught out.
So, next week I'm going from 4.2.2.12 to 5.1.6.2 on a Solaris 2.7 node.
I understand that PATHS are a new feature
Have already looked at the manual... But how come the status of my
scheduled backup is FAILED instead of COMPLETED as indicated on the manual
09/11/2003 03:30:00 09/11/2003 03:30:05 OPICSFS_DAIL- OPXFS_AS
Failed
Y_BACKUP
Hooft,
Hi!
Using command line to do a restore I would like to exclude some files or
directories.
Can I exclude files/directories using dsmc restore?
Maybee with FILEList option ?
Specify the files you have to restore, don't specify the others...
David Sniper Rigaudiere
Or,
use exclude.restore (as of 5.1.5.15 I know it is available).
Regard,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: David 'Sniper' Rigaudiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 11 september 2003 14:30
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Excluding files during restore
Hi!
Does anyone know if there is a TDP for oracle that will run on Linux
redhat interprize AS 2.1?
Karla Ross
Hello,
TSM-server AIX 5.1 and TSM 4.2.2.8
TSM-clients Windows and UNIX
For some clients we are working with pre- and postschedule commands. It
sometimes happens, for some reason, a post-schedule command is not executed
correctly and not executed at all. In the dsmsched.log the exit code is not
0.
I am running TSM 5.1.7.1 on an RS/6000 B80 using 32-bit. We will be getting
a new p650 server and would like to move to 64-bit. All the TSM storage
pools and database/log volumes are on a separate disk drawer that would move
to the new p650 system. I was going to install 5.1.7.1 on the new system,
The path definitions should be automatically defined during the upgrade of
TSM.
Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/03 06:53 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
hi, mark,
within 1 year we use 100 imation and 500 fujifilm ultrium1 tapes in ibm lto
drives. approximately 10% of imation tapes we had to return to distributor,
because of unloading problems. only 2 fujifilm tapes had serious errors.
ibm recomends fujifilm (some months ago maxell too) as
Thanks for the info, we have a LOT of write errors with Imation (except last
production series), but none with IBM tapes.
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
SD/ESN
We made the same upgrade 4.2 to 5.1 on our AIX server. We also have 3494
library. We deffinetly had to manually define the paths after the upgrade.
Dave Nicholson
Whirlpool Corporation
Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2003 07:53 AM
On the other hand, we upgraded from 4.2 to 5.1, have two 3494 libraries,
and did not have to manually define the paths..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/03 10:22AM
We made the same upgrade 4.2 to 5.1 on our AIX server. We also have
3494
library. We deffinetly had to manually define the
** High Priority **
thanks a lot for quick responce.
we have
AIX:4.3.3.0
PSSP version:3.1.1.0
OS kernel:64bit in all SP nodes
TSM Tapedrives:IBM 3590 Tape Drive and Medium Changer.
I have set css0 spoolsize,rpoolsize to 16777216 in both client and server.
TSM server type:S80, 7017
SP switch
Hi,
Maybe has anyone of you the same problems.
Environment 1:
2 * win2k TSM V5.2.0.1 servers sharing a library (S.A.N. Attached 3584Lib).
This was upgraded from TSM 5.1.7.1.
Starting as of the upgrade performance went down on the web interface and
admin command line (windows client / linux is
Ok, so here I can't see a pattern emerging. For some yes, and for some no.
Guess I'll just have to wait and see.
It's just that I need everything to take the shortest time poss (dont we
all), and would like to know exactly what I'll need to do, not having done
this before.
I'm sure it'll all
I'm assuming that the Library and Device definitions will still be in
place, so then it'll just be the paths that need defining. Or do I need to
define new drives and lib too ?
Farren
|++---|
|| Lawrence Clark |
Thanks Andy (and the resto of you who've responded).
I'm taking the two drives per HBA with a grain of salt :-)
If you follow the recommendations to the letter -- not more than two drives
per HBA and only one HBA on a dedicated PCI bus you find you're limited to a
maximum of 24 drives per TSM
Look at your upgrade notes..
It says 3494 library definitions are retained.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/03 11:34AM
I'm assuming that the Library and Device definitions will still be in
place, so then it'll just be the paths that need defining. Or do I need
to
define new drives and lib too ?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Ferraretto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 9:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584
But I'm wondering if there are any quality issues with either
of these brands. Also, I'm wondering if
Anyone out there used ibm's incarnation of linux on a z800 processor or similar?
We are moving from os/390 v2.10 to zos v3.4 which necessitates a new processor.
While we are at it, contemplating moving tsm from solaris 2.8 back to the mainframe
platform under linux.
Therefore, I am looking for
Dear All,
*** REMINDER - for the benfit of those who have missed this ***
*** APOLOGIES - to those who have already seen it previously ***
*** BOOKINGS - due to close on Sunday 14 September, 2003***
In June I let you know that we would be running a third TSM Symposium
at Oxford
I guess I can sum it up to not enough system to perform the task. Stopped
the TSM software and the format completes a little more than 1 GB per
minute.
Duane
-Original Message-
From: Ochs, Duane
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MARIST. EDU
My recollection is that we simply had to define the paths. However, SOP
says be prepared for anything. I also recall that we were told to remove
the DRIVE def's from all TSM library clients. The DRIVE's only need to be
defined to the library manager/owner in a library sharing environment now.
try:
on TSM
compressionno
TCPwindow 128 or 256
TCPbuffsize 32
on aix try to enable tcp_nodelayack. this is APAR IY31983.
Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
phones : +39(0)659664598
+393351270554 (mobile)
I ran a full backup of a Win2003 server last night with the 5.2.0.2 client.
The event shows as failed, but the backup actually backed up nothing. Here's
the stats:
09/10/2003 22:11:48 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
09/10/2003 22:11:48 Total number of objects inspected: 44,113
09/10/2003 22:11:48
Testing a post. Please delete.
We have purchased Fuji media and have over 500 LTO tapes in our library.
Works just fine.
George
-Original Message-
From: Mark Farber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Non-IBM LTO tapes in a 3584
Mark
I have a
We use Fuji tapes as well, in fact I understand that IBM tapes are
re-badged Fuji. Maybe someone out there knows for sure.
regards
Stephen
Dublin , Ireland
Cardoza,
George To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, Sep 12, 2003, at 02:52 Australia/Sydney, Ochs, Duane wrote:
I've seen very bad performance from JFS2 on AIX 5.1 under certain
circumstances - as soon as I understand more on the how+why, I'll be
raising a ticket with IBM.
I guess I can sum it up to not enough system to perform the
We are experiencing the same problem...
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Backing up
We have never had a prob. on JFS2, it whizzes along well. Are you
formatting a single 100Gig SP ?? Personally I'd break it up into at
least 4 volumes ??
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ripke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 12 September 2003 8:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to have Andy confirm this, but I believe that in order to back
up the system state data from a Windows 2003 client, you must be connected
to a TSM 5.2.0 or higher server.
What happens if you run a backup of all the filespaces except the
systemstate data? Does that work correctly
I was just looking at my Exchange TDP output and have it showing all
exchange backups ever created. It shows directory backups and information
store backups (full and incremental. exchange 5.5). Is there someway I can
query our output this list of backups to a text file? On the TDP side I
don't
41 matches
Mail list logo
