On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 11:33:36AM -0500, Todd Lundstedt wrote:
Am I stuck with doing a move nodedata within the OrigCopyStg, then
deleting the volumes?
Only if you are prepared to retrieve your off-site copypool volumes onsite
again; if you are not (as you should be :-) ) you have two
As far as I know, 'previous version' means ANY previous installed version,
even if you want to replace a newer release with an older one.
So MY anwser to your question would be 'yes'.
-Original Message-
By: Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send: Dienstag, 16. September 2003 17:05
Dear all
I have some question? I have Oracle9i on RH7.2 server ,I want
to use RMAN, TSM's can support oracle9i on linux
Pls anwser me, Thank you.
Natthakriss Mathanom
MIS System Operations
CRC.Ahold Company Limited
Tel: 662-9371700 ext 833
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Natthakriss Mathanom wrote:
Dear all
I have some question? I have Oracle9i on RH7.2 server ,I want
to use RMAN, TSM's can support oracle9i on linux
Pls anwser me, Thank you.
it was a question? If you have non IBM backup device you'll need TSM module
Rejean, Richard, Wolfgang, Dan, Hart and all
I added patch 5.1.6.0 and then patch 5.1.6.5. The
issue is addressed.
Best regards.
Bill
--- Hart, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also check to see what were the messages in the
Actlog right before the Mount error, sometimes there
are errors
Hi gang,
Found a gotcha and thought y'all would be interested in this. When we
changed our IP address on our TSM server, we went through and had to change
all the dsm.opt's and dsm.sys's that were going to this particular address
(a chore in itself). Come to find out that the 3494 tape library
I've used netapp nas as primary diskpool in the past...performance was
good...depends on your network set-up ...I had a GIGE connectionTsm
could not tell the difference between network mounted and fibre connected
disk in functionality...
The only problem I encountered was I forgot to turn off
Does anyone know if there are msi files or switches that can be used with the Tivoli
Application to create packages for this application for deployment?
Thanks,
Laura Booth
Carilion Health Systems
Server: Windows 2000 SP3
TSM Version: 5.1.9
OFM: Version 8.0
I have a Windows 2000 SP4 box that is running an Access database. This box has Open
File Manger configured and running. Each night when TSM runs to do it's backup the
database becomes corrupted and has to be repaired each day. Any
Thanks for all the replies! I was able to find out from someone at Tivoli that the APAR IC36566 actually refers to cloned HSM client data which was not made clear in the APAR. So if I don't have any HSM clients, then the APAR would have no affect on my TSM Server, which I don't. As far at the
Thanks, I'll check into the physical size/allocation of the file but I do have an automatic script that trims the volhist file weekly. I have to do this in order to get scratch tapes back into the fold. CA-1 will not recognize TSM tapes as scratch until they are deleted from the volhist file.
Does anyone know if there are msi files or switches that can be used
with the Tivoli Application to create packages for this application for
deployment?
I don't know Tivoli Application but you can find switches in README file.
Look at - When installing TSM silently: string.
Regards
David
NOTE: This e-mail message may contain information that may be privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure. It is intended for use only by the person to
whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in error, please do not
forward or use this information in any way,
Hallo,
backup incr at netware saved nothing, but query event says completed.
IBM says, the problem is fixed with TSM-Client 5.2.2 (IC37299).
But today there is no release date for 5.2.2 known.
Who has a simple way, to check the backups without using query event ?
Thanks
Andreas.
What? I see CA-1 recognize tapes as scratch when they outlive the REUSE
DELAY that is defined on the tape pool definition.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Shannon Bach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: APAR IC36566 for
select node_name,filespace_name,backup_end from filespaces where
backup_end current_timestamp - 1 day
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/17/2003 9:44:44 AM
Hallo,
backup incr at netware saved nothing, but query event says
completed.
IBM says, the problem is fixed with TSM-Client 5.2.2 (IC37299).
But today
This is the command that is provided, however, the options for the two new
features in 5.2, open file support image are not given for the silent
install command.
Anyone know what the ADDLOCAL should say now?
msiexec /i Z:\tsm_images\TSM_BA_Client\baclient\Tivoli Storage Manager
Client.msi
Image OFS I believe. I think it's case sensitive too!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Lisa Laughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PACKAGE DEPLOYMENT OPTIONS FOR TSM
This is the command that is provided,
Shannon,
The trimming of the physical volume history file should have no bearing on
the return of tapes back to scratch. TSM maintains volume history
information in the database; the physical file is merely a backup copy
that can be used for restoring the TSM server database, and for your own
Correct on all counts!
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good
Bill --
It may be too late for you (unless you REALLY want to revisit the dsm.sys
files again :-) but we use CNAMES in the DNS for our TSM server. So the
dsm.sys refers to adsm.nibco.com and this is a cname to thames.nibco.com --
and, in our D/R process, the cname gets changed to point at
Oops,
Seems as though one of our TSM servers has not been looked after
properly, has tried to overrun its recovery log and fallen over on its
face with the usual ANR7837S LOGSEQ errors. Our friendly second-level
guy went ahead and created a new log vol and tried to dsmserv extend to
get it in,
client w2k 5.1.7.6
server w2k 5.2.0.1
I tried to turn on traceflags INSTR_CLIENT_DETAIL in dsm.opt. I got the
following error
start of error message
ANS1823E Invalid trace keyword - 'INSTR_CLIENT_DETAIL'
ANS1823E Invalid trace keyword - 'INSTR_CLIENT_DETAIL'
ANS1036S
I am running TSM Version 5.1 server code on AIX and Solaris servers. I am
being directed to install the ADSM Cops utility but the documentation says
the newest supported version is TSM 4.2. Is anyone running ADSM Cops on TSM
5.1? Thanks in advance.
Linda Seeba
From: David McClelland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems as though one of our TSM servers has not been looked after
properly, has tried to overrun its recovery log and fallen over on its
face with the usual ANR7837S LOGSEQ errors. Our friendly second-level
guy went ahead and created a new log vol
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was under the impression that the TSM clients were multithreaded.
But I can not find any documentation that specifically identifies
multithreading as part of the client. Only that it will run on either
single cpu or multi CPU systems.
Greetings,
I just recently upgraded from an older NT-based TSM server from 4.2
to a new Win2K server running TSM 5.2.0.1. It has three BreeceHill DLT
tape libraries, a Q215, a Q6.210, and a Q9.140. I configured TSM to use
it's own drivers, naturally. The Q215 and Q6.10 libraries are
When TSM mounts a scratch tape the EXPDT field in CA-1 gets updated as PERMANENT and CA-1 will never recognize that tape as a scratch until the EXPDT changes to an expired date. The EXPDT will not change until I delete the stgdelete volumes from the VOLHISTORY file. So if I do a query volhist;
it could be the version of TSM server does not support that library. I just
upgraded from 4.2 to 5.1.7 because I have a Quantum M2500 library that is
not supported in 5.2.
Jim Murray
Senior Systems Engineer
Liberty Bank
860.638.2919
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~ _/) ~~
-Original
In this MVS system it does. In is built into the set-up of our TSM external library setup. See earlier reply to Matt Cooper.
Hi Andy, I have another question along these same lines. We use to be able
to include a custom dsm.opt file by copying it into the config directory on
the source. It does not seem to be copying this file to the client computer
when you run the setup. Is there something new I don't know about to
That's not exactly what he asked about, Richard. He's referring to the
TSM client application being able to open multiple CPU threads, not
multiple TSM sessions.
Mark - I understand that the question was about CPU multi-threading,
and multi-threading is the basis of the Multi-Session
There are also ways to configure the TSM client to facilitate Win2K (and
Win2k3) dissimilar hardware restores.
And they are? This server runs a daily incremental with ALL-LOCAL. Is there
something I should do as a PRESCHED for Active Directory? I did find an AD
Recovery paper on Microsoft, but
John,
If you are using library sharing, check apar IC37251. This bit us, but not
nearly so badly as IC37289 did!
Regards,
-=Dave=-
Sungard Vaulting Services
+44 (0) 20 7608 7140
Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings; they
did it by mercilessly slaughtering all
Hector,
It has change for V5.1.5 and later. The option is now TESTFLAG
INSTRUMENT:DETAIL.
You might want to use TRACEFLAG PERFORM instead, which combines config,
client detail, prefix, timestamp, and stats.
Bill Smoldt
STORServer, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Windows2000 SP4
TSM Client 5.1.6.5 configured for managedservices schedule webclient
Last night the backup schedule for this server was In Progress and just
plain never completed. Looking at the services, the Scheduler was started
manual, but there were no sessions with the server. The server
Define that kind of restore please?
Why does having to re-restore the system object after reboot have to do with it? Why
is that different? Because the restore of the system object done as part of the BMR
was done from the same named server, but that server was not configured for AD?
I've done
I know that this is supported in 5.2 without having to logically partition
the library but still not sure on the details.
Does this mean that the LTO1 and LTO2 drives would have to be defined to
different storage pools (different device class, different scratch pool
,,,)? If we were to only use
I was able to re-create the same thing. My custom dsm.opt file is not
copied from the config directory. I also noticed that the msi package is
now IBM Tivoli Storage Manager.msi, not Tivoli Storage Manager.msi as
documented.
lisa
Remeta, Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to do the AD restore in AD repair mode. You could perform the
entire restore scenario in AD repair mode. TSM can handle the job as you
have described in your scenario.
Regards,
Mike Dile
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I keep hearing this (maybe it was from you !) but can not attest to this.
This is not the way it is supposed to work.
I have never had any problems with CA-1 recognizing tapes as scratch when
TSM scratches them.
You need to check your configuration to make sure you are using the
propert exit
The initial server load was NOT configured for active directory. It was just
a minimal Win2k server with SP3 applied.
So for AD I should perform the first reboot into AD repair mode, and then
restore the system object AGAIN? Then I'll have to go through all the
finding new hardware dialogs. Or at
Tsm server v5.1.6.2, running on Sun e3500 under solaris 2.8.
Library is ibm 3494 ethernet ethernet connected.
Drives are four 3590b.
Many times this week during offsite reclamation, the process will end with the message
anr8447e no drives are available in library atoz.
Checking the activity
We use the Fujifilm tapes and have great luck with them, our library is an
ADIC Scalar 1000 (ADIC Scalar 100 is what the IBM 3583 is in real life), our
drives are IBM 3580 drives. We tried the Graham and the Imation, but found
Fuji seems to be the most compatible.
-Original Message-
From:
I'll second that. We were able to create a dsm.opt file in the program
files\tivoli\tsm\config directory and have it moved to the baclient
directory on the target machine. This stopped working with V5.2.0.2.
Bill Smoldt
STORServer, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Hi all
5.2 came out this summer so does that mean that 5.1 will be out of support around june
next year?. I've (tried) to search ibm.com but could not find an answer. The end of
support matrix only lists 4.1 and 4.2.
Thanks
Guillaume Gilbert
Conseiller - Gestion du stockage
CGI - Gestion
(5.1.6.4 on AIX 4.3.3, 3494 library with 3590's)
I had exactly the same problem yesterday afternoon. I couldn't
figure out what was wrong so I halted and restarted the TSM server.
(The software, not the machine itself)
Somehow it made the problem go away.
Regards,
Alexander
For both Bill and Mark: were you installing do a clean directory with no
pre-existing dsm.opt file?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only
Andy,
Yes, this was a new installation on a number of clients, no preexisting TSM.
Bill Smoldt
STORServer, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
If you are sharing the 3494, that problem largely disappears in
5.1.7.1. In earlier versions I would see some sort of unavailable or
inaccessible message with all drives empty.
At 09:29 PM 9/17/2003 +0200, you wrote:
(5.1.6.4 on AIX 4.3.3, 3494 library with 3590's)
I had exactly the same problem
OK, will look into.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
We didn't have a hang problem with 5.1.6.5 and then we upgraded yesterday.
Now backups are crawling and we have a hang problem. We're still trying to
figure out what's wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:23 PM
To:
Anyone heard about the Technical Guide redbook for TSM 5.2? Even a draft??
Bill Boyer
Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield. - ??
53 matches
Mail list logo
