My little input to your miracle:
Maybe switching to an domainuser alters the kind the tsm client uses to save
the data.
As an administrator he should use the backup api. As an domain usser he can
only use cifs access.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Holzwarth
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex
Here's another one.
Try this link it may help you.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/analystreports/tsm.pdf
or
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/analystreports/
As for STK vs 34XX. I've used 3494 for years. A few of the sites I have had
have a mixture of 3494 + STK
Allen,
The particular client manual will tell you what local device if any is supported
for backupset restore.
For example my netware backupset restores do not support locally attached
devices so have to been done over the network.
Of course at the server end the backupset can be on a file
Hello TSMers
A question regarding how TSM monitors files that have changed..
On win2000, TSM client 5.1.5.2, we have found that if we lose a drive and
have to do a complete restore onto a new disk (but with same windows drive
letter), the first time we do a inc backup, everything gets backed up.
Not available for Netware
John Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/01/2003 11:45:59 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Subfile backup on Netware
Question:
Is the subfile backup feature available with the Netware clients.
Hi all.
I have to install TDP for Oracle 5.1, so I am not sure about the
compatibilities with Oracle databases version.
I´ve got Oracle 8.1.6 and 8.1.7. May I use this TDP version with this
databases version ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Juanma.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:08:11 -0400
Joni Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone!
I have just installed TSM's Operational Reporting Tool and I am having
problems with the email notification connection. It keeps telling me that
it is having problems with the SMTP server name. Here
A question regarding how TSM monitors files that have changed..
On win2000, TSM client 5.1.5.2, we have found that if we lose a drive and
have to do a complete restore onto a new disk (but with same windows drive
letter), the first time we do a inc backup, everything gets backed up.
So what is
Thank you s much! It is working perfectly now!
Joni Moyer
Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(717)975-8338
Remco Post
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: cc:
Hi *SM-ers!
Since the upgrade of 3 of our Data Protection for Oracle clients from 2.2.1
to 5.2 I see a LOT of errors in the activity log like:
ANU2602E The object /mount/appl1//c-862102661-20031002-0a was not found
on the TSM Server
I checked these messages in the TSM log and compared them
Bill,
We do not back up the log.nsf files either because they are non-critical to the
recovery of Lotus Domino. This file is often recreated during maintenance and
that file will become either log1.nsf, log2.nsf, etc and placed in the mail2 folder
under subfolder logs. It will be considered a
This Frequently Asked Question list for the ADSM-L mailing list is
posted on the first day of each month. It was created to cut down on the
number of questions that are repeated regularly in the ADSM-L mailing
list from vm.marist.edu. I would be grateful for any requests to include
additional
My server halted after receiving this error:
10/02/2003 07:06:18 ANR7838S Server operation terminated.
10/02/2003 07:06:19 ANR7837S Internal error BUF059 detected.
TSM server code is 5.1.5.0
Anybody encountered this error? Is this a bug?
Thanks,
Ed
Hi Ed!
This is probbably cause by a full recovery log. You will have to allocate a
new one and extend your log.
As soon as TSM starts again, start a full database backup.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Edgardo Moso [mailto:[EMAIL
I had that problem and it was a aix tcp tuning issue. Do a
netstat -v ent1 | grep Receive Pool Buffer
where ent1 is the adaptor that your tsm traffic runs on. If your No
Receive Pool Buffer Errors: line is greater than zero you have the same
problem I had. We raised our receive pool buffer
Your recovery log is full. Issue
Dsmserv extend log
Best wishes
Kirsten
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Edgardo Moso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2003 15:19
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: BUF059 Error
My server halted after receiving this error:
hello,
we have some problems with expiring archived data.
tsm server 5.1.5.0
mgmtclass settings are correct.
what can be the reason for that behaviour.
with best regards
gernot
Hi all,
I get a lot of these media errors lately. Guess this is media related, but what should
I do??
Date/Time Message
--
10/02/03 15:06:25 ANR8302E
What experiences have you had with V5.2, on AIX if possible? Was it
5.2.01 or 5.2.0.2? TSM support recommended going to 5.1.7.2, but I
don't have the 5.1.7.0 media, but I have 5 copies of 5.2.0, so I was
thinking about doing that instead. Thanks.
Andy Carlson
- SPLXM wrote:
Hi *SM-ers!
Since the upgrade of 3 of our Data Protection for Oracle clients from 2.2.1
to 5.2 I see a LOT of errors in the activity log like:
ANU2602E The object /mount/appl1//c-862102661-20031002-0a was not found
on the TSM Server
I checked these messages in the TSM log
Haven't used it, but here is the link to 5.1.7.0
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/ser
ver/v5r1/AIX/LATEST/
Patches.
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/server/
AIX/
-Original Message-
From: Andy Carlson
you should use the lb and mt definitions, and the native device drivers for
the drives which I think you are saying you do use.
you can check this, in w2k, in the management console under tsm device
drivers-reports-device information.
Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 12:32:37 -0500
Stanley, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the situation: We are a managed hosting company that uses TSM
for backup, and we would like to hand off day to day administration of
the environement to the operations staff. There are a number of
inexperienced
Nope.
I don't have problem with the log.
That's also my first impression but when I checked the log it has still a lot of space
( 40%)
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:56:38 -0400
David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now this makes some bells ring over here. IIRC there was some bug in the AIX
5.1 TCP code, which in particular would shouw on TSM servers. I don't know
what it was any more, nor what the fix is (It was just smalltalk with
There was a major bug in Aix 5.1 64 bit mode tcp that caused major
slowdowns in backups. It was apar IY36925 fixed in bos.net.tcp.client
5.1.0.37. The receive buffer problem occurred with that fix already in
place.
David Ehresman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/2/2003 12:27:02 PM
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003
Is anyone using (tried) TSM 5.2 on AIX 5.2 using Lanfree
with Gresham's EDT product? Gresham hasn't
tested combination yet and
won't until November/December timeframe.
We are building new TSM server and would like to go
with above versions. Any feedback (positive or negative)
would be
Can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/03 02:00PM
show volumeusage [nodename]
certainly helps...note too that the show commands are undocumented and
unsupported.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rowan O'Donoghue wrote:
Agreed, it is probably the most important shortcoming!
In terms of when a DR is performed for
Hi,
I have been running 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.2ML1 for quite a while now (3-4 months)
with no significant issues. Everything works well and is very speedy. We
decided on 5.2 because we were using fastt products for disk storage and can
dynamically increase their size (well it requires a down...so it
Jon,
Why bother with tee-ing the dsmadmc sessions? I really don't understand
what else you need to see in addition to the ANR2017I's. Sure, the tee
would give you the output of their commands, but is there any need to see
the output of their QUERY ACTLOG, QUERY VOL F=D, UPD VOL ACC=READW, DEL
I'm trying to find out what the history of versions are for this TDP..
I currently have an old CD with 1.1.1 on it. I know the current version is
5.2.1 according to passport advantage and that I can also get 5.1.5 from
there. Is there anything between those version? I understand there is a 2.x?
Here's the situation: We are a managed hosting company that uses TSM
for backup, and we would like to hand off day to day administration of
the environement to the operations staff. There are a number of
inexperienced (in TSM) staff. We want a way to audit (beyond the normal
activity
Gerald,
The versions for Data Protection for Exchange
thus far have been:
1.1.0 - 4/1998
1.1.1 - 11/1999
2.2.0 - 3/2001
5.1.5 - 10/2002(VRML aligned with base client)
5.2.1 - 9/2003
The version jumped from 2 to 5 to align with the base TSM products.
Please read
All,
Thanks for this info. We'll patch our AIX box and report the results.
I'm curious about one thing though. If it's an AIX problem, why does shutting down
the TSM server (not AIX) and restarting it fix the problem?
Mark
--
Mark Ferraretto
Unix Systems Administrator
Deutsche Bank Hong
Hi,
APAR PQ65613
you have to apply patch.
5.1.5.1 or higher
--
SUDO Hideki
AIT,Inc.
Solution Division IT Service
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello,
we have some problems with expiring archived data.
tsm server 5.1.5.0
mgmtclass settings are correct.
what can be the reason for that
35 matches
Mail list logo
