This is an evergreen.
Your customers tell you HOW you should server them
and you are only expected to implement they solutin in a tool.
1) you can accept it and let them do
a) monthly ARCHives using a management class MONTHLYARCHIVES (to be defined
by you)
b) weekle ARCHhives using a
Abdullah,
this is the way TSM works.
Old versions of files are beeing expired leaving holes on tapes.
Look at A0007 maybe a week later, it will not be 100% full any more.
Once there are too many holes on a tape it will be reclaimd
(the data left copied to another tape) so that it is fully
free
Juraj,
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2004 16:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW:
Abdullah,
this is the way TSM works.
Old versions of files are beeing expired leaving holes on tapes.
Look at A0007 maybe a week later, it will
Hi,
Volumes are attached to a defined library and each library has its own
element range. Duplicate elements will not give you any troubles.
Regards,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Tony Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 3 maart 2004 14:09
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you migrated to 5.2.2 correctly, none of existing clients should NOT ask for the
password. Please review again what you plan to do...
gus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/3/2004 8:17:07 AM
Hi to all
This week I upgrade my TSM server version from 5.1.8.0 to 5.2.2.0 and my O.S
from windows NT4 to
Hello TSM users, a.a.o.o
I searched the mailinglist archive and the discussion forum, but did not
found a solution for my problem.
We are using TSM 5.2.2.1 for library evaluation. We are testing a HP
MSL5030 with two LTO1 drives.
Our disks provide a datarate of about 20MB/s.
LTO1 supports a
TSM is not load-balancing on a drive level. TSM will use multiple drives on
a job level.
Regards,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Patrick Rainer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 3 maart 2004 14:41
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: 2 LTO-Drives Load-Balancing
Hello TSM
Hello again
Sorry. Maybe my question can be wrong interpreted.
For example:
I have two migration processes from disk stgpool to tape drive.
My diskdrives offer about 20MB/s.
The question:
Is the transferrate of the diskdrives split up for the tape drives to 50%
for each drive? (10MB/s per drive)
Our TSM server is version 5.1.7.3 on AIX 5.1.
The TSM client on an sun solaris server was 5.1.5.14. We got
the following summary on an incremental backup:
Total number of objects inspected: 107,330
Total number of objects backed up: 414
Total number of objects updated: 0
Total
Hello.
I have a question concerning tape usage:
we have two sites, one using Windows and one using Netware. we make the same
at both sites, incremental forever, no special taks like archive or
aomething like that.
Now we see the following:
while the Netware-site is using the LTO1-Tapes with
Hiya,
I think I can see what you are trying to get at, but what I am curious about
is whether the 20MB/s from your disks is due to a physical SCSI bus
restriction, eg your disks are all attached on one 20MB/s SCSI bus, or
whether your 20MB/s is a speed you've seen through some monitoring tool,
Hello Patrick,
as far as I know TSM maintaines single I/O queues for each volume.
That said, with 2 migration processes running concurrently
you will have up to 2 I/O on tapes at one time (one per drive),
thus allowing for maximal throughput - if the rest of the system
allows :-)
As for how it
Hallo,
turn for a while TSM compression on (in contrast to HW-tape
compression you are probably using now).
This will not change things, but it gives you statistics
how your data are beeing compressed during backup.
Your HW compression does simillar thing with simillar results.
Probably you have
you are welcome!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Abdullah, Md-Zaini B BSP-IMI/231
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. März 2004 09:59
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff:
Juraj,
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2004
Hi Robert,
I have never moved a TSM server from NT4 to a Win2X OS, so I can't say for
sure, but it's probably the difference in OS that caused your problem.
We have moved TSM servers from AIX to Windows, and even though we did
EXPORT/IMPORT for all the client data, we had to reset all the
TSM writes data on the tape until it hits the physical end of tape.
At THAT TIME, the volume status is FULL and the PCT UTIL is 100%,
But as old versions of backup files (inactive copies) expire, or you delete
a filespace, then the amount of VALID data on the tape drops. So on A00011,
.2 % of
Hi Tony,
The element number is the internal address of the library components
(slots, drives, I/O door, etc.)
The software uses those element numbers when it issues SCSI commands to the
robot.
They are fixed by the manufacturer, and you really have no choice in the
matter.
Two libraries with
Hi Wanda
Thanks for the answer and the others too ...
I am aware that I need too upgrade the Aix system before upgrading TSM to
5.2.2.0
Regards robert
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004
Hi all,
Having dug though the archives I haven't found anything that looks quite like
this one, so I thought I'd throw it out there.
I'm currently implementing TSM at a site running several Netware 4.1 servers.
Understanding that it's no longer a supported platform, they still have a need
to back
Hello Group,
I've just started archiving using schedule type of archive and I am
wondering if there is a way to specify all local hard drives in the objects
field. I've discovered that I cannot use a wildcard drive specification and
that I need to use -subdir=yes. I'm working on archiving
I've just started archiving using schedule type of archive and I am
wondering if there is a way to specify all local hard drives in the objects
field. I've discovered that I cannot use a wildcard drive specification and
that I need to use -subdir=yes. I'm working on archiving WinTel boxes.
Just an aside, as the processes are running, type this command into TSM:
run q_proc_stats
It will show the transfer rate of each process. There is also a 'run r_ses_stats'.
Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03-Mar-04 8:35:47 AM
Hello again
Sorry. Maybe my question can be wrong interpreted.
For
Robert,
did you change the tsm server name during the upgrade? This will cause
password prompting because the password is stored in the windows registry
in a key with the name of the server.
In regedit, go to hkey_local_machine\software\ibm and drill down to
see what I mean.
Bill
At 08:17 AM
That's actually a good question. The Netware admin had rebooted it by the time
I came in. We'll run another test tonight and if it freezes again i'll make
sure we test the connectivity more thoroughly...
regards,
Paul
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can you ping the server when the server
As it turns out, we couldn't ping the server when it became unaccessible.
There's a monitor server here that does regular ping tests on the site, and it
recorded the Netware server in question as going down roughly the same time our
backup died, and TCP didn't come back online until we rebooted
Hi TSMers ...
i've a one basic question, i know that it's in manual but i couldn't
understand it.
Why do i need exactly COPYPOOL ? With other word what will be backed up on
copypool. Do i need have some media in Tape library with location =
COPYPOOL or
is it ok if i've only a LIBPOOL volumes
Win2K server with TSM 4.2.3.1
I had put in a pre-command for our Win2K and 2003 machines to generate a
file of the local config stuff.
I thought I had tested it, but it is hanging and wanting interaction on the
desktops.
What options do other folks user on ntbackup.exe to get it to run then close
Hi Bill
Yes you are right it is the answer
Thanks Regards
Robert
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William F. Colwell
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5.2.2.0 and
Hi Peter,
Copy pools are used for Disaster Recovery. Disasters can be small, like
primary pool tape corruption/defects or large like complete site loss.
The small thing is most likely to hit you now and again. If you can afford
to lose back up or archive data because of tape damages than there
29 matches
Mail list logo
