Hi to all
When running a backup on Netware client version 6.05 with TSM client version
5.1.6.0 I got this error message .
I know then Outlook must be closed to prevent this error on the pst file but
why the backup didn't continue
Any way to conturn this problem .. My copy
Hi TSM-gurus,
TSM client 5.1.5.0 on Windows 2000 Server.
In brief: I have to archive all JPG-files older than 1 year.
In Detail:
* I need a list of the archived files for my user. So I need to use the
CLI (right?).
* I need to filter by creation date (TSM uses the modified date) because
our
I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what
they've found...
Paul
Hi *SM-ers!
Our Windows guys discovered that one of their nodes was missing a drive
backup. Drive D: was skipped during backup.
The altered the dsm.opt and added D: to the domain statement. This resulted
in the following error:
ANS1228E Sending of object '\\kl10116j\d$' failed
ANS1153E Drive : is
Hi Paul. I have implemented new and upgraded a few shops - expect a
learning curve with the ISC/AC - see my previous posts to the list. The
new 5.3 function (parallel/serial, migrate and reclaim commands, etc.) is
great!. Also very much liked is the ability to delete individual backup
files with
- ANS1301E is telling you that some problem occurred on the TSM server...
so what does the TSM server activity log show?
- Off-hand, I do not know what specific problem you are seeing. However,
5.1.6.0 is pretty old in software-years. Consider upgrading to a current
level, which may already have
Hi,
If I upgrade TSM client on a w2k3 server, 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11. Then I have
SYSTEM OBJECT´s in 'q fi'. Compared to a clean install of 5.2.3.11.
Why does SYSTEM OBJECT remain? I think SYSTEM OBJECT should be converted or
expired... hopefully I´m just missing something here...
Any thoughts?
Hallo,
Could someone explain a little more about 'expiration continuing where
it left off' - this seems to imply to me that 'Cancel Proccess' on an
expiration causes the work the expiration has done to roll back, whereas
'cancel expiration' does not?
Matt.
_-'-_
-|-
-Original
The 5.2 (and higher) client uses Microsoft's Volume Snapshot Services
(VSS) for backing up Windows 2003 system state and system services,
whereas the 5.1 client uses the Microsoft legacy API functions. The two
methods are incompatible and cannot be converted between each other. Since
the
Guys,
We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All
has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the
TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2
instance.
Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to
yes, db2 has to be restarted.
dsm.opt/dsm.sys is only read during the startup of the db2.
Jeroen
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Thomas, Matthew
Sent: maandag 24 januari 2005 15:37
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DB2 LANFree
Yes, you will need to restart DB2 as it only reads the configuration file
during startup
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Propellervägen 6B
183 62 TÄBY
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51
Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what
they've found...
Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3),
runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use
Could someone explain a little more about 'expiration continuing where
it left off' - this seems to imply to me that 'Cancel Proccess' on an
expiration causes the work the expiration has done to roll back,
whereas
'cancel expiration' does not?
Matt - Here's what we know about it, as noted in ADSM
Daniel (and Jeroen) - thanks for the advice.
One further thought:
If, for example, the StorageAgent failed or was disabled in Services,
wouldn't the API default to the LAN path on finding the LANFree route
unavailable?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Richard!
I checked it myself, the options file is ok. The backup GUI also just
doesn't list the D: drive. Indeed it's strange that TSM says ANS1153E Drive
: is a cluster disk. while you would expect message: 'ANS1153E Drive D: is
a cluster disk.. I'm thinking about an incorrect registry entry,
Depends on when the storage agent fails. If it fails during backup/restore
processing, the DB/2 backup(or restore) will fail. If it fails and then
the DB/2 process starts, yes it will fail-over to LAN functionality.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel
Hi all,
Further on my email on failing Oracle backups, we probably have
discovered where the problem was, and it was indeed a misconfiguration.
When going through all configuration files again we realised that
COMMTIMEOUT and IDLETIMEOUT were only set on the TSM server and not in
the storage
We just moved some of our LANFree W2K and W2K3 clients from one datacenter to
another. The SAN is still in the old datacenter, to LANFree from those clients
is currently impossible (without additional hardware). I instructed the move
team to stop, and disable the StorageAgent service on those
I suspect IC42268. The APAR description includes a circumvention.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that
Would you please elaborate on your problem with FILE volumes?
Are you no longer using them?
Thanks,
Gretchen
Jurjen Oskam wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote:
I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what
they've found...
Yes, we're on
Hi Jurgen:
Can you provide any details on the bug with FILE volumes? Is there an
open APAR on this?
Thanks,
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Jurjen Oskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
FWIW, the README.SRV file for AIX says:
When the 5.3 server starts existing FILE volumes in FILLING state are
marked as full.
In 5.2.x and prior servers, the server accepted a PATH definition for a
local FILE Library and FILE drives, although it was not used in any way.
Such definitions are
Jurjen,
We are also on AIX 5.2 and currently on AIX 5.2.3.1 we will
be upgrading to TSM 5.3 soon. Did you do a migrate install?
Did you follow any special procedure or did you just follow
the AIX smitty install instructions? We will be installing the
ISC/Admin Center.
Thanks
Jurjen Oskam
Hi,
I recently installed 5.3 on Red Hat Linux EL 3, upgrading from 5.2.4.0.
The config is very small - 15 clients, a disk pool and a tape pool,
a 30-slot SCSI library (Spectra Logic 2K) with two Sony AIT drives.
What's cool in 5.3 is that it uses the Linux SG driver to control SCSI
devices,
Good Afternoon.
Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a
particular client?
I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out
the individual filespaces(total).
I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=dand I
Hello All!
I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would
like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to
the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the
MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the
Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one
I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did
that change?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization
I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one
session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of
sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your
user is looking for.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager
Hello,
I am seeing the following errors in the TSM server log. I can ping
the client successfully and the client is up. Anyone with any other
suggestions on what to check?
ANR8213W Session open with saxtix11-tsm timed out.
ANR8214E Session open with saxtix22-tsm failed due to connection
Nothing has changed. When this option was introduced, it was (and still
is) available for all clients.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Hi Andy!
I guess I already knew the answer, but was wondering if there is a way to
force an archive of multiple files to transfer through 1 session. We had
been looking at lan-free and we were seeing multiple (2) tape mounts
starting for single archive jobs. I guess I could specify maxnummp 1
Joni, try RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is
Hello,
I am seeing the following errors in the TSM server log. I can ping
the client successfully and the client is up. Anyone with any other
suggestions on what to check?
ANR8213W Session open with saxtix11-tsm timed out.
ANR8214E Session open with saxtix22-tsm failed due to connection
Found in the Windows version of Backup Archive Clients Installation and
User's Guide.pdf, v5.2, page 329, RESOURceutilizaion value...
Supported Clients
This option is valid for all Windows clients. The server can also define
this option. The Tivoli Storage Manager client API does not support this
Hi again!
Won't that then reduce the restore to 1 session as well? I guess I will
have to have them decide what is more important for their server. Thank
you again for your help and suggestions!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
I can see how that might be misleading, but the Windows client manual
information is in the context of the Windows OS, and not necessarily that
of other operating systems (Unix, NetWare, etc.). If you look in the
corresponding manual for the other OSes, you'll see that
RESOURCEUTILIZATION appears
OK.. I will look at the manuals again, and see what I have downloaded..
Must have mislabeled one, or something.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:03 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Thanks. I can now query the various drives but I cannot seem to get the
SYSTEM OBJECT.
I want to be able to tell how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking
up(90 days worth).
With the space in the name it does not seem to find it. I tried using
single quotes and double quotes around SYSTEM
Hi Joni,
I had no knowledge of the restore requirement, so my suggestion was merely
to limit the number of option settings to one (RESOURCEUTILIZATION),
rather than two (MAXNUMMP and RESOURCEUTILIZATION). But you are correct,
setting the RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1 would limit you to one restore
Shouldn't you be using the query occupancy command?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jones, Eric J
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:54 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Filespace query
Thanks. I can now query the
Whoops, I really wasn't paying attention to what you were really looking
for.
QUERY FILESPACE (the admin command, not the client command) shows you file
system utilization on the client machine, as of the last incremental
backup of that file system. Since SYSTEM OBJECT is not really a file
Thanks for the help.
Worked great and I have exactly what I want.
Thanks again,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:14 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Filespace query
Whoops,
Hi all
I'm trying to restore an image of one of my Windows 2000 server
Everything goes well except that the files or folders that have been
deleted after the image are there ... and I dont want them. ..
I did the command :
dsmc retore image \\server\c$ c: -asrmode=yes -noprompt -incremental
Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup?
If you look up the BACKUP IMAGE command in the client manual, you will see
a discussion about using image backup along with incremental backups to do
what you want. Check out method 1.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
This is very weird - has anyone else ever seen anything like this? TSM
5.2 on z/OS 1.4, using a 3494 ATL. I was running reclamation on my
offsite copy storage pool over the weekend and got a mount failed error
on a volume. Investigation showed that the volume was being requested by
TSM and the
Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup?
I sent this too soon: did you run a full incremental backup *before* the
image, then run incremental after the image?
You need to start from a full incremental backup, then run image, then
subsequent incrementals, in order for the TSM
Thanks Andrew
I did exactly that procedure ... but it didn't work ... I will try it
again just to make sure I didn't forget a step ... but this is what I did
- Full incremental of my C: and D: drive , and system object
- IMAGE backup using Windows PE procedure
- ADD and DELETE files and folders
Eric, I forgot to mention... this is already fixed in 5.3.0.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes
I heard there is a way to set up failover with TSM's disk cache.
In talking with a colleague he indicated TSM had the ability to perform
transparent failover between disk volumes. Example:
A TSM server is writing data to a disk volume. Disk volume fails. TSM
immediately begins writing to a
Hey guys.
We have four TSM servers (long story, don't ask) across two sites,
setup with one as a config manager, the other three all subscribing to
the config pushed out by the manager. For various DR reasons, we're
wanting to do data exports from those four servers to a fifth server,
located at a
I'm a nubie. I've had one class and wasn't even here when TSM was
installed. I have less than a year of experience with Solaris and way
less than that with TSM. I sort of got drafted into this.
Solaris 9
TSM Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.5
Library is a SUn/StorageTek L700e30 with ten IBM Ultrium
On 25/01/2005, at 11:31 AM, I wrote:
I've defined the server links and the requisite administrators. I've
also -- by way of experimentation as much as anything else -- set up
the fifth server to subscribe to the same config pushed to the other
servers. I'm now finding that, whenever I try to
Hi Gurus,
Can any body help me in configuring sun's L1000 automated library with
tivoli storage manager which is installed in solaris OS.
As per the notes in the admin guide of solaris
1.installed TIVsmSdev driver.
but getting error when tried to update the mt.conf and lb.conf file using
55 matches
Mail list logo