System Error

2005-01-24 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi to all When running a backup on Netware client version 6.05 with TSM client version 5.1.6.0 I got this error message . I know then Outlook must be closed to prevent this error on the pst file but why the backup didn't continue Any way to conturn this problem .. My copy

Select files by creation date for archiving

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas Rupp
Hi TSM-gurus, TSM client 5.1.5.0 on Windows 2000 Server. In brief: I have to archive all JPG-files older than 1 year. In Detail: * I need a list of the archived files for my user. So I need to use the CLI (right?). * I need to filter by creation date (TSM uses the modified date) because our

Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Paul Fielding
I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Paul

TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk

2005-01-24 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi *SM-ers! Our Windows guys discovered that one of their nodes was missing a drive backup. Drive D: was skipped during backup. The altered the dsm.opt and added D: to the domain statement. This resulted in the following error: ANS1228E Sending of object '\\kl10116j\d$' failed ANS1153E Drive : is

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Joerg Pohlmann
Hi Paul. I have implemented new and upgraded a few shops - expect a learning curve with the ISC/AC - see my previous posts to the list. The new 5.3 function (parallel/serial, migrate and reclaim commands, etc.) is great!. Also very much liked is the ability to delete individual backup files with

Re: System Error

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
- ANS1301E is telling you that some problem occurred on the TSM server... so what does the TSM server activity log show? - Off-hand, I do not know what specific problem you are seeing. However, 5.1.6.0 is pretty old in software-years. Consider upgrading to a current level, which may already have

TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11

2005-01-24 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt
Hi, If I upgrade TSM client on a w2k3 server, 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11. Then I have SYSTEM OBJECT´s in 'q fi'. Compared to a clean install of 5.2.3.11. Why does SYSTEM OBJECT remain? I think SYSTEM OBJECT should be converted or expired... hopefully I´m just missing something here... Any thoughts?

Re: TSM DB -- How big is too big?

2005-01-24 Thread Warren, Matthew (Retail)
Hallo, Could someone explain a little more about 'expiration continuing where it left off' - this seems to imply to me that 'Cancel Proccess' on an expiration causes the work the expiration has done to roll back, whereas 'cancel expiration' does not? Matt. _-'-_ -|- -Original

Re: TSM client uppgrade 5.1.7.3 to 5.2.3.11

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
The 5.2 (and higher) client uses Microsoft's Volume Snapshot Services (VSS) for backing up Windows 2003 system state and system services, whereas the 5.1 client uses the Microsoft legacy API functions. The two methods are incompatible and cannot be converted between each other. Since the

DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas, Matthew
Guys, We're backing up DB2 v7 (WinNT) via LANFree to a TSM 4.2 server on AIX. All has been relatively fine and dandy. However, we're now due to upgrade the TSM server to v5.2 and must therefore revert to LAN backups for this DB2 instance. Does anyone know whether a db2stop/db2start is required to

Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN

2005-01-24 Thread Hooft, Jeroen
yes, db2 has to be restarted. dsm.opt/dsm.sys is only read during the startup of the db2. Jeroen -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas, Matthew Sent: maandag 24 januari 2005 15:37 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: DB2 LANFree

Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN

2005-01-24 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Yes, you will need to restart DB2 as it only reads the configuration file during startup Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 TÄBY Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Thomas, Matthew [EMAIL

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Jurjen Oskam
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on AIX 5.2 and TSM 5.3 here. Very smooth upgrade (from 5.2.3), runs OK. We did hit a bug with FILE volumes, and cannot reliably use

Re: TSM DB -- How big is too big?

2005-01-24 Thread Richard Sims
Could someone explain a little more about 'expiration continuing where it left off' - this seems to imply to me that 'Cancel Proccess' on an expiration causes the work the expiration has done to roll back, whereas 'cancel expiration' does not? Matt - Here's what we know about it, as noted in ADSM

Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas, Matthew
Daniel (and Jeroen) - thanks for the advice. One further thought: If, for example, the StorageAgent failed or was disabled in Services, wouldn't the API default to the LAN path on finding the LANFree route unavailable? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk

2005-01-24 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Richard! I checked it myself, the options file is ok. The backup GUI also just doesn't list the D: drive. Indeed it's strange that TSM says ANS1153E Drive : is a cluster disk. while you would expect message: 'ANS1153E Drive D: is a cluster disk.. I'm thinking about an incorrect registry entry,

Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN

2005-01-24 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Depends on when the storage agent fails. If it fails during backup/restore processing, the DB/2 backup(or restore) will fail. If it fails and then the DB/2 process starts, yes it will fail-over to LAN functionality. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel

Re: Failing incremental Oracle RMAN backups

2005-01-24 Thread Andreas Almroth
Hi all, Further on my email on failing Oracle backups, we probably have discovered where the problem was, and it was indeed a misconfiguration. When going through all configuration files again we realised that COMMTIMEOUT and IDLETIMEOUT were only set on the TSM server and not in the storage

Re: DB2 LANFree reconfiguration to use LAN

2005-01-24 Thread Todd Lundstedt
We just moved some of our LANFree W2K and W2K3 clients from one datacenter to another. The SAN is still in the old datacenter, to LANFree from those clients is currently impossible (without additional hardware). I instructed the move team to stop, and disable the StorageAgent service on those

Re: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I suspect IC42268. The APAR description includes a circumvention. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Gretchen L. Thiele
Would you please elaborate on your problem with FILE volumes? Are you no longer using them? Thanks, Gretchen Jurjen Oskam wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:15:47AM -0700, Paul Fielding wrote: I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what they've found... Yes, we're on

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Rushforth, Tim
Hi Jurgen: Can you provide any details on the bug with FILE volumes? Is there an open APAR on this? Thanks, Tim Rushforth City of Winnipeg -Original Message- From: Jurjen Oskam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re:

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
FWIW, the README.SRV file for AIX says: When the 5.3 server starts existing FILE volumes in FILLING state are marked as full. In 5.2.x and prior servers, the server accepted a PATH definition for a local FILE Library and FILE drives, although it was not used in any way. Such definitions are

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Timothy Hughes
Jurjen, We are also on AIX 5.2 and currently on AIX 5.2.3.1 we will be upgrading to TSM 5.3 soon. Did you do a migrate install? Did you follow any special procedure or did you just follow the AIX smitty install instructions? We will be installing the ISC/Admin Center. Thanks Jurjen Oskam

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-24 Thread Dmitri Pasyutin
Hi, I recently installed 5.3 on Red Hat Linux EL 3, upgrading from 5.2.4.0. The config is very small - 15 clients, a disk pool and a tape pool, a 30-slot SCSI library (Spectra Logic 2K) with two Sony AIT drives. What's cool in 5.3 is that it uses the Linux SG driver to control SCSI devices,

Filespace query

2005-01-24 Thread Jones, Eric J
Good Afternoon. Is there an easy way to see how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up on a particular client? I can see what the total space that the client uses but I'd like to find out the individual filespaces(total). I tried to do aquery filespace owgwttsm SYSTEM OBJECT f=dand I

resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello All! I have a Solaris client at the 5.2.2.0 TSM client level and the user would like to know how to stream a single archive that sends multiple files to the TSM server through 1 session instead of multiple sessions. I have the MAXNUMMP set to 2 for this client and I have looked at the

Re: Filespace query

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Try tacking on the NAMETYPE=UNICODE option on the QUERY FILESPACE command. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Todd Lundstedt
I thought resourceutilization was a Windows Client option only.. Did that change? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] resourceutilization

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I don't understand the question. What specifically is meant by one session per file? And why is the user concerned with the number of sessions? You can set RESOURCEUTILIZATION to 1, maybe that is what your user is looking for. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager

ANR8214E connection refusal

2005-01-24 Thread Timothy Hughes
Hello, I am seeing the following errors in the TSM server log. I can ping the client successfully and the client is up. Anyone with any other suggestions on what to check? ANR8213W Session open with saxtix11-tsm timed out. ANR8214E Session open with saxtix22-tsm failed due to connection

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Nothing has changed. When this option was introduced, it was (and still is) available for all clients. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Joni Moyer
Hi Andy! I guess I already knew the answer, but was wondering if there is a way to force an archive of multiple files to transfer through 1 session. We had been looking at lan-free and we were seeing multiple (2) tape mounts starting for single archive jobs. I guess I could specify maxnummp 1

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Joni, try RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is

Re: ANR8214E connection refusal

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas Denier
Hello, I am seeing the following errors in the TSM server log. I can ping the client successfully and the client is up. Anyone with any other suggestions on what to check? ANR8213W Session open with saxtix11-tsm timed out. ANR8214E Session open with saxtix22-tsm failed due to connection

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Todd Lundstedt
Found in the Windows version of Backup Archive Clients Installation and User's Guide.pdf, v5.2, page 329, RESOURceutilizaion value... Supported Clients This option is valid for all Windows clients. The server can also define this option. The Tivoli Storage Manager client API does not support this

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Joni Moyer
Hi again! Won't that then reduce the restore to 1 session as well? I guess I will have to have them decide what is more important for their server. Thank you again for your help and suggestions! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I can see how that might be misleading, but the Windows client manual information is in the context of the Windows OS, and not necessarily that of other operating systems (Unix, NetWare, etc.). If you look in the corresponding manual for the other OSes, you'll see that RESOURCEUTILIZATION appears

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Todd Lundstedt
OK.. I will look at the manuals again, and see what I have downloaded.. Must have mislabeled one, or something. Thanks -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:03 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU

Re: Filespace query

2005-01-24 Thread Jones, Eric J
Thanks. I can now query the various drives but I cannot seem to get the SYSTEM OBJECT. I want to be able to tell how much space the SYSTEM OBJECT is taking up(90 days worth). With the space in the name it does not seem to find it. I tried using single quotes and double quotes around SYSTEM

Re: resourceutilization

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hi Joni, I had no knowledge of the restore requirement, so my suggestion was merely to limit the number of option settings to one (RESOURCEUTILIZATION), rather than two (MAXNUMMP and RESOURCEUTILIZATION). But you are correct, setting the RESOURCEUTILIZATION 1 would limit you to one restore

Re: Filespace query

2005-01-24 Thread Todd Lundstedt
Shouldn't you be using the query occupancy command? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jones, Eric J Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:54 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Filespace query Thanks. I can now query the

Re: Filespace query

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Whoops, I really wasn't paying attention to what you were really looking for. QUERY FILESPACE (the admin command, not the client command) shows you file system utilization on the client machine, as of the last incremental backup of that file system. Since SYSTEM OBJECT is not really a file

Re: Filespace query

2005-01-24 Thread Jones, Eric J
Thanks for the help. Worked great and I have exactly what I want. Thanks again, Eric -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Filespace query Whoops,

restore image on windows 2000

2005-01-24 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Hi all I'm trying to restore an image of one of my Windows 2000 server Everything goes well except that the files or folders that have been deleted after the image are there ... and I dont want them. .. I did the command : dsmc retore image \\server\c$ c: -asrmode=yes -noprompt -incremental

Re: restore image on windows 2000

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? If you look up the BACKUP IMAGE command in the client manual, you will see a discussion about using image backup along with incremental backups to do what you want. Check out method 1. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group

Tape volume in wrong storage pool/devclass?

2005-01-24 Thread Joe Howell
This is very weird - has anyone else ever seen anything like this? TSM 5.2 on z/OS 1.4, using a 3494 ATL. I was running reclamation on my offsite copy storage pool over the weekend and got a mount failed error on a volume. Investigation showed that the volume was being requested by TSM and the

Re: restore image on windows 2000

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Did you run an incremental backup after the image backup? I sent this too soon: did you run a full incremental backup *before* the image, then run incremental after the image? You need to start from a full incremental backup, then run image, then subsequent incrementals, in order for the TSM

Re: restore image on windows 2000

2005-01-24 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Thanks Andrew I did exactly that procedure ... but it didn't work ... I will try it again just to make sure I didn't forget a step ... but this is what I did - Full incremental of my C: and D: drive , and system object - IMAGE backup using Windows PE procedure - ADD and DELETE files and folders

Fw: TSM thinks local disk is a cluster disk

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Eric, I forgot to mention... this is already fixed in 5.3.0. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes

TSM disk failover?

2005-01-24 Thread David Chapa
I heard there is a way to set up failover with TSM's disk cache. In talking with a colleague he indicated TSM had the ability to perform transparent failover between disk volumes. Example: A TSM server is writing data to a disk volume. Disk volume fails. TSM immediately begins writing to a

Export node direct to managed server problems.

2005-01-24 Thread Stuart Lamble
Hey guys. We have four TSM servers (long story, don't ask) across two sites, setup with one as a config manager, the other three all subscribing to the config pushed out by the manager. For various DR reasons, we're wanting to do data exports from those four servers to a fifth server, located at a

Define dbvolumes on raw disks

2005-01-24 Thread Robert Keeney
I'm a nubie. I've had one class and wasn't even here when TSM was installed. I have less than a year of experience with Solaris and way less than that with TSM. I sort of got drafted into this. Solaris 9 TSM Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.5 Library is a SUn/StorageTek L700e30 with ten IBM Ultrium

Re: Export node direct to managed server problems.

2005-01-24 Thread Stuart Lamble
On 25/01/2005, at 11:31 AM, I wrote: I've defined the server links and the requisite administrators. I've also -- by way of experimentation as much as anything else -- set up the fifth server to subscribe to the same config pushed to the other servers. I'm now finding that, whenever I try to

To configure Sun's StorEdge L1000 library in tivoli

2005-01-24 Thread Geetha Thanu
Hi Gurus, Can any body help me in configuring sun's L1000 automated library with tivoli storage manager which is installed in solaris OS. As per the notes in the admin guide of solaris 1.installed TIVsmSdev driver. but getting error when tried to update the mt.conf and lb.conf file using