On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:18 AM, zareyna wrote:
I could only see port 1581 is listening.
Port 1581 (the HTTPPort default) is used by the Client Acceptor
Daemon/Service for scheduler initiation and/or Web client access,
where what it accepts is governed by the MANAGEDServices client
option, which
Greetings,
I am updating the list about this problem in case anyone else gets
bit by it.
Richard was right in a measure; we had a tape drive that was failing
to eject tapes properly. The side effect, though, with TSM's library
inventory becoming corrupt, is a bug addressed by
hi all, i've been thinking ...
is one storage agent enough to serve all lanfree clients we wish to back up
?
for example:
on server A which is STA i have running dsmsta with following configuration
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/tivoli/tsm/StorageAgent/bin # more dev*
set staname STA_2
set stapassword
Hi again,
First, thanks for all of your advices in this case.
In my department the prefered server operating system is AIX but
unfortunately I've no influence on the choice of OS at our client servers
:-(
I also heard about the new disk chaching mechnism announced for TSM 5.4 and
hope that is a
Hi all, running TSM 5.3.4 and 5.2.3 on client (Novell). What happens
when running with DSMCAD backup runs fine backing up San volumes as well
as local volumes (SYS) on Client Server. As soon as backup is done, TSM
does it's Thank you and reloads next schedule event on Client Server.
But what
Hello,
I would be very appreicative to hear what you think on some of the
questions I have on the backup approaches on Websphere and MQ Series.
Websphere:
1.) Does Tivioli now provide a TDP for Websphere for version 6.0? I know
the software is out there for 5.0 but prior to that there was
Hi all, running TSM 5.3.4 and 5.2.3 on client (Novell). What happens
when running with DSMCAD backup runs fine backing up San volumes as well
as local volumes (SYS) on Client Server. As soon as backup is done, TSM
does it's Thank you and reloads next schedule event on Client Server.
But what
Richard Sims wrote:
On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
Richard Sims wrote:
Hi Richard,
We tried something like this?
restore VIRTUALNodename- nodename
-fromnode= serva\sys:home/proj/* -tcpserveraddress=x
servb\sys:home/proj/
Didn't take the
Where can I find the tool dbviewb for JBB 5.3? I'd like to check our
journal states with it.
Otto Chvosta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
12/13/2006 07:13 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
My site once had a primary tape pool and a copy tape pool used for
some of our larger clients, with both of these pools collocated by
node. Offsite reclamation was a painful experience. TSM did not
seem to make any attempt to order the input tape mounts
intelligently. When a new input tape was
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
We tried something like this?
restore VIRTUALNodename- nodename
-fromnode= serva\sys:home/proj/* -tcpserveraddress=x
servb\sys:home/proj/
Tim - See the Unix clients manual for overview and examples
(which the Netware
Otto Chvosta a écrit :
Hi again,
First, thanks for all of your advices in this case.
In my department the prefered server operating system is AIX but
unfortunately I've no influence on the choice of OS at our client servers
:-(
I also heard about the new disk chaching mechnism announced for
Richard Thanks again! I will look into this and experiment further!
Tim
Richard Sims wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
We tried something like this?
restore VIRTUALNodename- nodename
-fromnode= serva\sys:home/proj/* -tcpserveraddress=x
Also very happy and stable on 5.3.4.0. (You'd have already heard from me
here on this list if it wasn't!) Another reason to go to 5.3.4.0 is that
it fixes that nasty-sounding security exposure in TSM they've been
yammering about from IBM and even at secunia.com.
Roger Deschner University of
14 matches
Mail list logo
