I am not receiving any messages from forum for a couple of days. Why?
Grigori G. Solonovitch
Senior Technical Architect
Information Technology Ahli United Bank Kuwait http://www.ahliunited.com.kw
Phone: (+965) 2231-2274 Mobile: (+965) 99798073 E-Mail:
My last was from Hana Darzi in the 12th.
Grigori Solonovitch grigori.solonovi...@ahliunited.com
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
14/09/2010 10:06
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] No messages from
I am sorry, it was no messages from 12th of September and it looks strange.
Grigori G. Solonovitch
Senior Technical Architect
Information Technology Ahli United Bank Kuwait http://www.ahliunited.com.kw
Phone: (+965) 2231-2274 Mobile: (+965) 99798073 E-Mail:
Hi,
It is always recommended to separate tape and disk traffic in TSM
environments. How about when adapters are NPIV logical HBAs? Does it make
sense to assign two logical adapters (one for disk and another for tape)
from a single adapter port to an AIX partition? The adapter is an 8Gb/s FC
or a
To my way of thinking, if you have a single pathway (no matter how it
looks to other environments), you'd like to keep the same type of
traffic on that pathway and not mix disk and tape.
I'd keep tape and disk on separate physical adapters ... virtualize as
much as you like, but separate the
Hi,
one of the major issues is that tape drives, most notably older and cheaper
drives, tend to 'misbehave'. Some send out a scsi reset after each dismount,
causing your disk traffic to stop. And I've heard even worse stories.
Another thing is that modern drives have no problems moving 200
We have started trying out the 6.2.1.0 client code on a number of
test and development systems using the Oracle version of TSM for
databases. One of these is generating error messages like:
09/08/10 05:30:50 ANS1467E ICC routine ICC_Init returned: majRC = 4, minRC =
0,
desc = 'Unable to find
Hi,
IMO SCSI reset command should not harm disk traffic if disk and tape are
connected to separate NPIV adapters. Actually they are separate physical
adapters except that they share the same medium for their own FC frames in
lower levels. Needless to say that SCSI is an upper layer protocol.
Hi
I'm sure you are right on the SCSI reset point. That protocol is
implemented higher up. Though I think the gist of the answer was more of
a don't know and that was an example of what's happened in the past.
Some of us have had some odd happenings when mixing in the past.
You are also right
