Hi,
we are using TSM HSM. When we delete migrated files (the stub files of them)
from filesystem, HSM is recalling the
files before deleting them.
Is that normal? Is there a way to configure it? I would be nicer when TSM just
mark the files in HSM as removed.
Any experiences or hints?
Best
Hi TSM'ers,
I need material for TSM 5.4 Training and Exercise in softcopy. Does anyone
have it? Or where can i download it?
Thanks in advance,
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ieduasst/tivv1r0/index.jsp
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Yudi Darmadi
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 8:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.4 Training
Ich bin bis 07.10.2010 abwesend.
Gerne werde ich Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Alexander Heindl
Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht [ADSM-L] TSM
5.4 Training Material gesendet am 06.10.2010 14:49:11.
Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die
Hi Folks.
I am running TSM 6.2.1.1 under AIX 6.1.5. I am writing data to a Data
Domain DD880 using NFS.
We have a long running DB2 backup that backs up about 7TB. By the
way, this is a fairly new setup. Most things are fine, but sometimes
I get:
DATE_TIME: 2010-10-06 11:32:11.00
Andy
A couple of questions:
Nothing in the AIX errlog?
Does it ONLY do it on the long running DB2 backup?
Maybe it's worth running something outside of TSM so write to one of these
FS's to see what happens?
As for question 2, I think if you are writing a backup direct to a
volume, and you get
If you are seeing write errors but no write issues showing up on the DD, start
looking at the network link between the TSM server and the DD appliance.
Dale Jolliff
Senior Practice Consultant
Support - Professional Services
Backup Recovery Systems Division
EMC Corporation
2421 Mission College
Hi All,
one of the sun servers we backup was rebuilt (the os was upgraded to
solaris 10) and the client was re-installed with a new name bolton01 to
boton0s10
F.y.I - the reason for the new name is because will eventually get rid
of backups using the old name
i want to restore restore the
We have TSM 5.5. Shortly after this was originally setup at the start of this
year data from the DIRMC storage pool was migrated to tape due to the settings
for the DIRMC storage pool not being correct. Now 9 months later the DIRMC
storage pool is still only at 3% of capacity. The migrated data
MOVE DATA tapevolname STGPOOL=dirmcpoolname
Will move data from that tape back to the DIRMC storage pool.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul_Dudley
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Each weekday morning we run the following command backup stg BKPLTO4POOL
COPYPOOL_LTO3 to backup the data that has been backed up overnight onto LTO3
tapes and then checkout these LTO3 tapes and send them offsite. I have a
reclaimation process running on a daily basis for the COPYPOOL_LTO3
Don't use the GUI for major restorals - performance suffers.
Use -Virtualnodename for CLI-based cross-nodename operations, as described in
the client manual.
Richard Sims
Timothy Hughes wrote:
one of the sun servers we backup was rebuilt (the os was upgraded to
solaris 10) and the client was re-installed with a new name bolton01 to
boton0s10
F.y.I - the reason for the new name is because will eventually get rid
of backups using the old name
Another
Running reclamation is not an issue. Generally I run it when my scratch
tapes go below my threshold limit.
Is BKPLTO4POOL stg pool is it a copy pool or primary pool?
Regards,
Rajesh Lakshminarayanan
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Assure that you aren't collocating on the offsite copy pool tapes, and that
partially filled tapes are not going offsite - that will certainly eat
scratches fast. Obviously, offsite tapes need to come back to provide a
replenishing tape supply. Be careful about checking in offsite tapes, as
15 matches
Mail list logo
