Thanks Del. I will do that
Regards
Adrian Compton
Group IT Infrastructure
Aspen Pharmacare
8 Gibaud Street, Korsten, Port Elizabeth, 6014
P O Box 4002
Korsten
Port Elizabeth
6014
Switchboard Tel No: +27 (0) 41 407 2111 Direct Tel No: +27 (0) 41 407 2855
Fax:+27 (0) 41 453 7452 Cell:+27
Hello,
I check TSM STUDIO for monitoring and reports .
Do anybody use it? Is it good tool?
Thank You hana
_
Hana Shparber (Darzi)
Computation Center, Ben-Gurion University
Email: ha...@bgu.ac.ilmailto:ha...@bgu.ac.il
Phone: 972-8-6461160, Mobile:
I would rather check out www.tsmmanager.com
I use this product for the last 3 years and it is really good.
You can down load trial for a month..
Looked at TSM studio. Just as bulky and cumbersome as IBM's attempts at
reporting.. Don't know when IBM will ever attempt to get the reporting side of
Or, if you want to be able to access your TSM monitoring from anywhere in the
world, while still allowing the collection of historical data, granular
analysis and a nice interface both for reporting and operation:
http://www.debriefingsoftware.com/
I've worked with TSM Manager, ServerGraph and
Speaking of this book, I found the paragraph titled: Mitigating
performance degradation when backing up or archiving to FILE volumes
Yes, I did follow their recommendations plus other recommendations for
transfer of data to high-performance (TS1130) tape drives. Didn't see
much if any
Zoltan,
Is your database/logs on separate disks and separate HBAs from your
filedevclass disks and are the disk HBAs separate from tape HBAs?
Neil Strand
Storage Engineer - Legg Mason
Baltimore, MD.
(410) 580-7491
Whatever you can do or believe you can, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power
Correct. This machine has 8-internal 600GB 15K drives. The OS and DB are
on one pair of mirrored drives. The log and archlog share the rest of
the internal drives in a raid-10 (I think) array plus leaving extra space
to DB expansion (one server I plan to migrate to these new 6.2 servers has
In reference to these recommendations, this is what one of my SAN folks
said:
If increasing the queue depth for the individual disks is something you
can do on a CLARiiON, it's not something I'm familiar with. On the HBA
(and if you can), you would do that from the host side (like with
SanSurfer
for AIX:
lsattr -l hdiskX - look foor the queue_depth field values between 20 and 64
make sense, 128 in some extreme cases
chdev -l hdiskX -a queue_depth=Y (but only if the vg is off-line)
I found that some drives only support a queue_depth of 1... in that case, you
found your bottleneck.
On
This is RedHat Linux 5.5
From:
Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
10/21/2010 01:24 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with SAN/FILEDEVCLASS
storage
Sent by:
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
for AIX:
lsattr -l hdiskX - look foor
There should be queue depth settings for individual disks and for the
HBA on the server - not on the Array. The sum of the Disk settings
should not exceed the setting for the HBA.
By EMC voodoo I meant the EMC management application that allows you to
monitor the performance of the array - I'm
Hi all,
YMMV, I've really never played with these, but check
/sys/block/sdX/queue/nr_requests and some other files in that dir
ow BTW, google is your friend ;-)
On 21 okt 2010, at 19:38, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
This is RedHat Linux 5.5
From:
Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl
To:
Thanks for the hint...using Google is great (which I do), but if you
don't have a clue what to look forlike a dictionary--you have to
have some kind of clue/general idea how a word is spelled to be able to
look it up ;)
I did find a /sys/block/emcpowerb/queue/nr_requests file
On 21 okt 2010, at 20:58, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
Thanks for the hint...using Google is great (which I do), but if you
don't have a clue what to look forlike a dictionary--you have to
have some kind of clue/general idea how a word is spelled to be able to
look it up ;)
Correct. This machine has 8-internal 600GB 15K drives. The OS and DB are
on one pair of mirrored drives. The log and archlog share the rest of
the internal drives in a raid-10 (I think) array plus leaving extra space
to DB expansion (one server I plan to migrate to these new 6.2 servers has
a
Ich bin bis 27.10.2010 abwesend.
Gerne werde ich Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Alexander Heindl
Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht Re: [ADSM-L]
Lousy performance on new 6.2.1.1 server with SAN/FILEDEVCLASS storage gesendet
am 22.10.2010
Thanks for the reply but one thing I am still confused about are these copypool
tapes sitting in my onsite tape library. Given that the primary reason for this
copypool is for offsite tapes, should these copypool tapes currently residing
in my tape library (created by reclaimation processes) be
17 matches
Mail list logo
