I have some questions about this article, maybe they are strange, but anyway:
What is this:
- try to push customers to use TSM 6?
- try to implement new pricing policy?
- totally new product instead of Tivoli Storage Manager (from licensing point
of view)?
- something else?
Grigori G.
Hi,
On 12 jun 2011, at 05:53, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
Hi,
Tape volumes canned be accessed if there is no TSM database. If happens,
this is not exactly true. The tapes can be accessed. IBM just claims that it's
hard/impossible to make sense of the data. That may or may not be true. There
are
On 12 jun 2011, at 08:23, Grigori Solonovitch wrote:
I have some questions about this article, maybe they are strange, but anyway:
What is this:
- try to push customers to use TSM 6?
- try to implement new pricing policy?
- totally new product instead of Tivoli Storage Manager (from
I couldn't access this page more:
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/1/897/ENUS211-201/ENUS211-201
Is it removed by IBM?
Grigori G. Solonovitch
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Remco
Post
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011
No, it is still there - your version of the link is missing the .PDF extension
of David's original.
Interesting how, as well as formalising this capacity licensing arrangement,
IBM has also gone to lengths to include the PVU information gathering mechanism
into TSM 6.3 - perhaps acknowledging
I am very sorry. Thank you very much!
Grigori G. Solonovitch
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David
McClelland
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:56 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Suite for Unified Recovery
Yes but you need to use TKLM or its MF equiv to be of value unless you
use an appliiance.
On 6/11/11, Mehdi Salehi ezzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Tape volumes canned be accessed if there is no TSM database. If happens,
restoring the database and gaining access to data seem to be very difficult
I would consider migrating to FDR/UPSTREAM in that regard.
On 6/11/11, Mehdi Salehi ezzo...@gmail.com wrote:
An open TSM server can very happily work with a z/OS TSM client.
There are TSM version 6 clients for z/OS, just not the server.
Maybe that client is just for Unix System Services. What
In the US, encryption also covers a regulatory issue. Many states now have
laws that spell out the responsibilities of sites to protect personally
identifiable information (information about persons including their financial
info, medical info, etc.)
The short version is that if a tape goes
Part of the problem is that companies would like to standardize on TSM
and related products, but don't want to be repeatedly stung for point
solutions. eg if they use DB2, there is no cost for the TSM client, but
MSSQL or Oracle there is. Some organizations just want the
all-you-can-eat
Our exchange backups (Doing Full) are a little under 4.0 TB and they are taking
14 hours. We are using a Virtual Tape library and the bandwidth is great,
however they are just taking way to long. I also increased the Amount to 5 for
each exchange node as we have 120 drives. Does anyone have
How much performance degradation would there if encryption is on? Although
it is the duty of drive itself (I suppose), it might have negative influence
on backup and even restore performance?
Can TSM for MVS backup DASDs like image backup of open systems? I would be
grateful if you send me references to study more about TSM for z/OS. I have
admin guide and admin reference, but not much conceptual information in it.
Thank you.
13 matches
Mail list logo
