electronic vaulting for archive

2011-09-13 Thread Mehdi Salehi
Hi, Electronic vaulting for backup data is possible by active data pools and equipments like TS7650G. The question is how to vault archive data which are not inherently permitted in active data pools? Thank you, Mehdi

TSM 6.2 installer

2011-09-13 Thread Ehresman,David E.
Anyone had the TSM 6.2.1 server (AIX) installer fail saying there is not enough space when in fact there is plenty of space? If so, what did you do? I'm trying to install on AIX 6.1 TL6. David Ehresman

Re: TSM 6.2 installer

2011-09-13 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Dumb question.Did you have the correct permission/root? When I had a similar issue, it was because I wasn't root or the filesystem owner. From: Ehresman,David E. deehr...@louisville.edu To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 09/13/2011 10:09 AM Subject:[ADSM-L] TSM 6.2 installer

Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

2011-09-13 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
I think I know the answer to this question but figured it would be a good question to ask, This morning I was getting reports that backups were failing due to backups not being able to get space in the disk stgpool. When I did a Q STG, this is what I get: 9:25:34 AM MOON : q stg Storage

Re: electronic vaulting for archive

2011-09-13 Thread Steven Langdale
My definition of Electronic vaulting is using electronic means to transfer backup/archive data to your offsite repository. This is really regardless of what the target is. I currently electronically vault to both ProtecTIER and TS3500 libraries. So, in essence if your primary to copy stgpool is

Re: TSM 6.2 installer

2011-09-13 Thread Erwann SIMON
Hi David, You need plenty of space in /opt mainly, but enough space is also needed in /usr, /tmp and /. See install guide. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON -Original Message- From: Ehresman,David E. deehr...@louisville.edu Sender: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

2011-09-13 Thread Prather, Wanda
...because some huge backup is in progress occupying the other 66%. It can't migrate yet because it's still in progress. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:23 AM To:

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

2011-09-13 Thread Richard Sims
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote: Why would a disk storage pool be 100% Utilized and only 34% migratable when I don't have Caching turned on? A considerable factor is that Pct Migr represents committed data. Richard Sims

Re: TSM 6.2 installer

2011-09-13 Thread Ehresman,David E.
Yes, running as root. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:12 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2 installer Dumb question.Did you have the correct

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

2011-09-13 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Yes, that is kinda what I guessed. I have the 4TB SQL backup still running from Saturday. It is only 50% done. There has got to be a better way to handle SQL backups of LARGE databases. This is causing numerous headaches/problems with other backups by pre-allocating the space or if going to

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

2011-09-13 Thread Del Hoobler
Hello Zoltan, Using STRIPES breaks the backup into multiple chunks. The STRIPES value that you specify will indicate how many chunks are created at backup time. If you still cannot get the backup speeds you need, and you do not get useful suggestions from this list, please open a PMR with IBM

Re: Disk storage pool 100% utilized but NOT cached

2011-09-13 Thread Billaudeau, Pierre
Hi Zoltan, Is it possible you had a very large (or several) backup running using the remaining 66% (over 4 tb) of your backup pool ? Current backups freezes backup data space on the disk pool so it is not eligible for migration. Pierre Billaudeau Analyste en stockage Livraison des

Follow-up: Question about Hybrid method upgrade to TSM V6.2.2 and server-to-server export

2011-09-13 Thread Prather, Wanda
Posting a follow-up to this thread. Been there, done that, didn't like it when I tried it. Customer had a TSM 5.5 server with ~100G data base. Moving to 6.2.2 on new hardware. Testing showed that the EXTRACT for the upgrade took only 2 hours, but the INSERTDB would take at least 10 hours.

Re: Follow-up: Question about Hybrid method upgrade to TSM V6.2.2 and server-to-server export

2011-09-13 Thread Xav Paice
We hit the exact same issue in test - so we took a rather butcher-ish approach: - When starting up the 'old' server following the extract, we defined a new, temporary stgpool and directed all new data to that pool. All other volumes were marked 'read only'. - normal night's backup ran, to the

Re: electronic vaulting for archive

2011-09-13 Thread Mehdi Salehi
Thanks Steven, would you please explain more how you vault archive data? Mehdi