Ah, correct, I miss-read the syntax on UPDATE NODE.
Replication is already running from TSM02 to TSM01, so nothing to worry about
there.
So, the following:
On TSM01: REMOVE REPLNODE
On TSM02: REMOVE REPLNODE
On TSM02: UPDATE NODE REPLSTATE=ENABLED REPLMODE=SYNCSEND
On TSM01: UPDATE NODE
PERSISTENCE PAYS OFF!
Well done, both of you!
Best regards,
Mike, x7942
RMD IT Client Services
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Neil took me up on my offer to look at a trace, and thanks to his
> persistence, that indeed led to
Hello all,
Neil took me up on my offer to look at a trace, and thanks to his
persistence, that indeed led to unmasking a problem in the 7.1.4 server.
APAR IT15117 has been opened for this issue. It may take a day or so before
it is visible on the web. As discussed previously, the files can be
Hi,
you can't update node with parameters: REPLM=RECEIVE and SEND (according
administration guide). Those parameters will set automatically after first
replication completed.
I think the right way is remove replnode and when set REPLM=SYNCSEND for source
and REPLM=SYNCRECEIVE for target node.
I'm using Spectrum Protect 6.3.4.300 on Windows servers.
I've been running NODE replication for months, but need to make a change for a
node.
The current setup: Server TSM01 replicates to Server TSM02 and TSM02 replicates
to TSM01.
The change: a node is to be "relocated" to the DR site; thus
Big delay but probably it is still actual.
I check the dual path using the following:
after lin_tape configuratiin you can see the similar output:
Changer output:
# cat /proc/scsi/IBM*
lin_tape version: 3.0.6
lin_tape major number: 242
Attached Changer Devices:
Number model SN