Do you have paths for both the library and drive defined for tsmu on
tsmlibm?
Becky
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andy Carlson
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:20 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Shared Tape Library
I have
We are moving both of our 3995 optical libraries from Missouri to Ohio. Has
anyone ever done this? If you have is it absolutely necessary to check out
each and every optical disk or is there some better more time efficient way?
I am going to call IBM support but often there is knowledge here
For what it is worth we just moved our 3584 from St Louis MO to Cincinnati
Ohio. We left all of the tapes in the library and added some that we had
been storing onsite also to the library. When we brought things back up we
did a audit library and then a checkin search=yes status=private. It
My finding is that if you have several stanzas
Server A
...
Server B
And you do a dsmc it will automatically connect to server B and not server
A. That is important to us because if we have an oracle database connecting
with one node name and the client files being backed up as a different node
Yes no problem. We wrote a shell menu that opens at the tail end of the
.profile which the options we want them to do. A combination of logging in,
running a console session, checking in tapes, labeling tapes, etc. When
they exit the menu it automatically exits the machine.
-Original
Is there more information in the activity log about what this return code 14
is?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
fred johanson
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Empty tapes not returning to
How many tapes do you have in the onsite primary pool and the offsite pool?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape Reclamation Failing
I'm getting the
We haven't had a problem.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lawrence Clark
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 5.1 on AIX 5.2
We originally decided to put TSM 5.2 on the AIX 5.2 system for the
More a discovery then a problem. We are running Tivoli Data Protection for
oracle version 5.1.5.0 on aix 5.2
We discovered last week that we had data going to tapes that we did not
expect. After a great deal of research we discovered the problem.
In the Redbook and manual for TDP for Oracle
We were told that the best way to do this at least with Tivoli Data
Protection for SAP R/3 was to have each thread go to a different storage
pool that way no thread will ask for a tape that another thread is using.
We thought that was silly and pushed back. Hopefully it will be fixed.
Becky
We are using it for SAP documents and archiving. It has it's own tsm
software server but shares a physical server with 2 other tsm software
servers and the commonstore server instances (4). We have disk pools,
optical pools, and tape pools. We have a domain for each Commonstore
Instance. I
Any chance there is another system out there with the same ip address?
Good luck
Becky
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possibly OT: How to
make sure that /dev/rmt1 on source server is the same drive as /dev/rmt1 on
the client server
We discovered that they didn't always come in the same. It sound like the
server to server communications is working fine.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL
Define the new and add it and then delete the old. Don't forget to mirror.
-Original Message-
From: Thach, Kevin G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about recovery log
I'm confused about how I should go about
We had an issue with this and discovered that it was looking in the api
directory for the dsm.sys and not the ba/bin directory so we just put a link
in api to bin and it worked.
-Original Message-
From: Josh-Daniel Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:20 AM
To:
an INCLEXCL
file, hence, you'll backup everything on your client server during your
regular client backup.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Davidson, Becky
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDPO
Can you use a db snapshot to recover a database in a dr situation?
I can't think of why not but I would rather be safe then sorry.
Thanks!
Becky Davidson
Data Manager
EDS/Sara Lee Bakery Group
voice: 314-259-7589
fax: 314-877-8589
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try long term archive tapes. Mark them as offsite when you send them to
overflow so they can't be pulled. If you know that your retention is 2
weeks then take out the tapes written yesterday. It is a matter of
reviewing your retentions and storage pool configurations to see what tapes
won't be
did they create the link to the correct libobk.a from I believe
$ORACLE_HOME/lib to /usr/tivoli/tsm/...?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Gieseke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDPO V5.2 with RMAN setup
Greeting all,
My DBAs
If you do a q vol 10L1 what result do you receive?
Can you check the tape in as scratch now that it is owned by lib_manager?
-Original Message-
From: Markus Veit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antwort: Re: Del volume on
update libv libname volname status=scr
do this on the library manager. I just did it on a 5.1.x server and had no
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Markus Veit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Del volume on library manager
I know that when we tried to restore a SAP database via backint on a
different machine then it was backed up from we needed to make the hostname
the same name as it was on the original machine. I don't know if this is
exactly what you are trying to do or if this was the same error we received.
We have 21 lto drives that connect to 3 8 port hubs (each in the lto cabinet
they service) that connect 1 1 gb switch We then have 3-4 paths to each of
the hosts.
We have 21 drives on the other side of the room from the switch so this made
it cleaner for us to make changes.
Becky
-Original
Yes
I have 1 AIX server with 2 tsm servers on it with 4 libraries attached. 1
3494 was SCSI now fibre, 1 3584 always fibre, 2 3995 optical libraries both
SCSI. The 3494 and 3584 are shared between the two tsm servers and one
other. The 3995s are only used by one of the tsm servers.
Becky
Are you seeing anything in the CommonStore logs? If you do an archadmin it
will show what CommonStore is doing.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: brian welsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Polling sessions Commonstore
Hello,
How large is your SAP database?
Is the tsm server on the same physical server as the SAP database?
If not what kind of network do you have between the two?
Are you using multiplexing in TDP for R/3?
Is your CPU maxed on the SAP database server during the backups?
What kind of disk is your SAP
We went straight from 4.1.2 to 5.1.5 with no stop at 4.2.x and few if any
problems. We were at AIX 4.3.3 ML 9
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Upgrade from 4.1 to 5.x questions
Are you getting any errors in the activity log? There may be problems with
those tapes. Do a search with those tapes in your activity log and see if
there are tape or drive errors.
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Zukowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:18
You do checkins and checkouts on the library server. To let the library
manager know that a tape belongs to a client do an audit library from that
client. I don't remember if the path function came in 4.2 or 5.1 but if you
have paths then you only define on the server not the client.
Steps 1 -
They have a link on the front page of the software site that says they have
network issues.
I think most of IBM is down because I can't get documentation on SAN
microcode.
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL
You just need to know which drive equals which drive. When you define the
drives and/or paths make sure that if drive 1 is /dev/rmt/0stc on the master
that drive 1 on the slave is /dev/rmt/8stc. If they don't match you will
have problems.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: StorageGroupAdmin
Do you include the database tapes in reporting and bringing back?
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Tailor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Offsite Volumes
Hello!
TSM 5.1.6.2 on AIX 4.3.3.10
I am running DRM and I am seeing
If you are going to go from Aix 4.3.3 32bit to Aix 5.1 64bit then do Aix and
then Tivoli but you must do Tivoli before you do your first backup so
essentially at the same time. If you are going to go from Aix 4.3.3 32 bit
to Aix 5.1 32bit then you have flexibility and you can do it for the most
I did an archive on a Windows 2000 system using tsm client 5.1.5
We then uninstalled the software that had been running as part of a disaster
recovery test
I then did a retrieve of everything I archived.
We seem to be missing the registry information.
Do archives not back that up? I have looked
Delete the two hdisk again. Run cfgmgr again. Check it and if you see the
same type of pattern of 1 vpath showing 4 and the other 2 showing only one
then the shark guy needs to recheck his configuration. If you see a
different pattern try running cfgmgr again. There was a problem awhile back
How are your dbv defined? Are they files or logical volumes? Can you get
in from another server or is all contact into the server hosed? When you
say you are having a problem with a disk what kind of problem are you
having? Is it SCSI, SSA, NAS or SAN attached?
Becky
-Original
on logical volumes. And they are
SCSI attached.
Diana
At 12:52 PM 1/2/03 -0600, Davidson, Becky wrote:
How are your dbv defined? Are they files or logical volumes? Can you get
in from another server or is all contact into the server hosed? When you
say you are having a problem with a disk what kind
Another thought is that when they deleted the files the files were still
open so there is still some link to them. If you can unmount and remount
the filesystem the problem may go away.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Verkooyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December
They are normal yet they mean you took some hit on a tape drive. You will
probably notice that the date time stamp on the files matches errors in your
errpt. If you have a series of them for one drive they definitely point to
a problem. We get them every so often. We don't get alot unless a
I know there is or at least was Tivoli Storage Manager Implementation which
would make you a Tivoli Certified Consultant. That is what I have done.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lisa
for whatever reason the manual are still on tivoli.com
Here are the Oracle ones
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/DataProtectio
nforOracle2.2.1.html
and here are the rest
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/TD_PROD_LIST.
html
you have
a different name (libobk64.a) than the one that has always been. Do I
relink it the same way with the same old name, or do I use the new name?
And, the 5.1.5 manual is for MS SQL onlyit's time for my medication,
now.
thanks Becky,
lisa
Davidson,
Becky
For my SAP systems I have 4 management classes
SID_saplog1
SID_saplog2
SID_sapincr
SID_cold this is for tsm cold backups and restores. I also use the
TSM expiration but we have been thinking about using TDP versioning but it
is one of those don't fix what isn't broken. TDP uses the archive
I have implemented the TSM Library Manager feature. I have 14 drives shared
among 4 TSM servers. When I tried the categories and use whatever was
available if tsmsvr1 tried for drive 1 a couple of times and tsmsvr2 was
using it then tsmsvr1 marked it offline. It made for a huge mess. Now I
I think the first thing I would do is move the data off the tapes to another
tape. Then I would try the recall again. It appears the tape is going bad.
-Original Message-
From: rachida elouaraini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go check out the PCI guide on the IBM web page for your machine.
hdisk0 and hdisk2 are scsi internal
hdisk1, hdisk5, hdisk14, hdisk4, hdisk8, hdisk11 are attached to one adapter
and are probably in the same drawer but that is easier to tell in diag under
task selection, ssa service aids, link
One of your drives is offline. Try bringing that back online and see how
things go. You only have 2 drives and if the other is busy then it will
fail.
-Original Message-
From: Kempadasiah, Umesh [mailto:u.kempad;SOUTHERNCO.COM]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL
for configuring Tape storage pool
I rectified the drive problem, both drives are online.still I am getting the
same error.
Did I miss anything ?
Thanks and regards
Umesh K
-Original Message-
From: Davidson, Becky [mailto:Becky.Davidson;SLBG.COM]
Sent: Thu 11/7
Are any of your drives offline? Do you have any drives available? What
happens when you do an audit vol 700270 fix=yes?
becky
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:deehre01;LOUISVILLE.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Volume not
I would disagree with their lack of communications. With the Tivoli news
information was sent out on almost a weekly basis. They also offered a free
online class introducing people to the new web area. I was the only one on
the conference call I attended so I got a personal tour of everything.
have you tried doing and audit vol on the volume?
-Original Message-
From: Chetan H. Ravnikar [mailto:Chetan.Ravnikar;SYNOPSYS.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tape missing under q libv (HELP)
Hello
I have a strange situation, when doing a
We used to run SQL Backtrack and we now run TDP for SAP R/3. In my opinion
here are the differences
SQL Backtrack
Benefits
- great compression ratio
- seems to handle well large databases
Disadvantages
- licenses are based on size of database if you grow alot (which we do) you
spend alot of
Tim
From what kind of server to what kind of server? What kind of disk are you
on and how is it attached? Can you attach your old tape hardware to the new
one?
We moved servers but we were moving AIX to AIX and could just disconnected
the disk tsm was on and then reattach to the new server.
We used to for our SAP databases but our databases grow to fast to support
the constant size change license purchases from SQL Backtrack. We switched
to TDP and it has helped because we lost the finger pointing between BMC and
Tivoli when we had a backtrack problem.
Becky
-Original
We are just under 2TB with SAP. We are sitting on a shark. We are using 10
3590E1A drives attached to 2 San Data Gateways attached to 2 2109 S16
switches with 4 fibre adapters on the host. Our tsm server and database
server are the same server. We backup in around 7-8 hours for a full
backup.
As for shared memory I don't think TDP For Sap R/3 supports shared memory
anymore.
In our testing we have been turning off compression and been getting better
performance. TDP's compression only removes white space.
What performance issues have you seen with 3.2.0.11? We have experienced
some
How many threads and multiplexing? What kind of machine is the SAP db and
what is the TSM db on? What kind of drives?
We are at 1.5 with 7 hours and are always looking to tune
-Original Message-
From: Clarence Beukes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:52 AM
Has anyone else experienced the need to on an almost weekly basis reboot
their IBM 3584 so that you can get access to the LTO Specialist again?
Everything else seems to work fine I just can't get into the gui. I am
running at library code level 2460.
Any thoughts or wisdom would be greatly
What are your expiration parameters for both tdp and tsm? When was your
last backup?
-Original Message-
From: J Sorensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failed brrestore deleted my entire SAP database
I ran the brrestore
check what your archive class looks like too. I know for TDP for SAP R/3
that is what is uses.
-Original Message-
From: Theresa Sarver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Expiring TDP for Oracle data
Hello;
I've been
What about retv for t=a. I know that on TDP for SAP is it does everything
as archives so it may actually be your archives that aren't going away. You
do need to make sure that retv is greater then or equal to how long you keep
them in TDP.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Rob Schroeder
If you do a q db then you will see a line that shows the Maximum Extension
then just do an extend db number with the number being a number the same
size or smaller then the available space in the extension column.
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Ariceto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Another thing to look at is q stg name f=d at what the reclamation level
is
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Pilgram
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: TSM 4.2, Private won't go into scratch
Hi Zbyszek,
Just try this one
If you are using TDP and have the retries set it will just retry on a new
tape. At least that has been my experience
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SAP Backup Recovery During a
I have had the same concern. I also have had two drives replaced because
tapes were stuck. It is an interesting theory...instead of fixing the drive
when a tape is stuck they just replace it. Definitely different from the
3590s.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Kauffman, Tom
We received an error similiar to thisdid you receive any operating
system errors? Ours was shark attached and ended up being an fibre apar.
-Original Message-
From: Lisa Cabanas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANU2508E
create a third mirror. Create it and then delete the other thus you are not
exposed
-Original Message-
From: Roger Deschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mirrored DELETE DBVOL, LOGVOL?
Oh, I guess it's just my paranoid
Ilja
We have some of our database volumes on the shark and I still mirror my db
volumes. You mirror not only to protect from disk errors but also to protect
from corruption. I believe that there was a discussion recently of someone
who had a corrupted database volume. A shark will not protect
is /var/adsmdbl the filesystem? I think the only ways you can do it is the
logical volume which would be /dev/radsmdbl in this case or a file
/var/adsmdbl/filename but not as a filesystem.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12,
Go in to diag, task selection, ssa service aids, and link verification.
Scroll down to the adapter that they are connected to and see if you can see
all of them and they have numbers in either a1 and a2 or b1 and b2. You may
be having problems with a cable.
Let me know the results.
Becky
PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Davidson, Becky
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tdp r3 and versioning
Has anyone out there used the tdp for r3 versioning instead of expiration?
How does it work with disaster recovery? What are the bonuses or
detriments?
Thanks
Becky
Has anyone out there used the tdp for r3 versioning instead of expiration?
How does it work with disaster recovery? What are the bonuses or
detriments?
Thanks
Becky Davidson
Data Manager/AIX Administrator
EDS/Sara Lee Bakery Group
voice: 314-259-7589
fax: 314-877-8589
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have some worm optical media that we want to start storing outside the
optical silo. I want to protect it with some sort of case but I don't have
enough of the sleeves that they come in to store them in that. I also need
some sort of shelving. Does anyone have any suggestions on where I can
What are the categories used?
I would imagine if it didn't do it in 3.7.3 it won't in 4.2.1 I know what
we had in 3.1 transferred fine to 4.1.2
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Orville L. Lantto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We ran option 1 for a long time both with twintailed scsi and a san but have
now mostly switched to option 2. We shared all of the drives and frequently
ran into problems where tsmsvr1 had a drive and tsmsvr2 tried for awhile to
use it and then marked it unavailable until I marked it online.
We have a 3584 with 6 3580 (LTO) drives and 3494 with 14 3590E1A drives
shared between 3 AIX servers containing 4 TSM servers. The 3590 drives are
SCSI attached to 2 san data gateways which are attached to 2 brocade
switches and the AIX servers are also attached to the brocade switches. I
have
vary on/off volume_name wait=yes/no
Try doing a lsvg -p on the volume groups that contain your tsm db and log
volumes to make sure that the volumes are available. Did you boot the box
between the shutdown and start up of TSM?
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL
What we did was put the indexes, data, log, and rollback in their own
filesystems. We then determined what were the hot datafiles and indexes.
From that we determined the disk sizes. We used 10.5 for our large
filesystems, 5.3 for medium size, and 1.5 for hot small. We then spread the
I want to say that if you go through the San Data Gateway pages in IBM land
there is a link to that off of the documentation pages. I will look closer
in a bit but that might help.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February
Did you try your fibre channel adapter software?
Still looking for other info but I think we installed off of the cd's we
received with our adapters.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL
Initially I felt left out but I received a copy later...have time you will
probably get yours too. She is great for the ego though
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who else got
Due to other issues I deleted all of my lto drives and library and am
redefining them. I am following through multiple redbooks and manuals that
say
def library ltolib libt=scsi device=/dev/smc1
and then for the drive
def drive ltolib ltormt17 device=/dev/rmt17 element=257
but when I do a q dr
: Davidson, Becky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:14 PM
Subject: defining lto drive not looking correct
Due to other issues I deleted all of my lto drives and library and am
redefining them. I am following through multiple redbooks and manuals
that
say
Did you install atape and atldd? Before using tsm make sure that mtlib can
talk to it. You can test that by simply doing an mtlib -l/dev/lmcp0 -qL
This will tell you if the machine can talk to the tape library. If it can't
make sure that you can ping it and that the /etc/ibmatl.conf is
We have a 3494 and it works great. We also have a 3584 which works well.
What kind of purpose are you going to use it for?
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Gene Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3494 Tape Library
Depending on how you do expiration TDP keeps as many backups as your archive
management class has specified and the frequency you run expiration. You
can check to see a successful backup either via the Administrative Assistant
if you purchased it or looking at the log files. I know for TDP for
Jan
Not a problem at all. TSM does not care how they are attached. TSM depends
completely on the operating system for the intelligence on the attaching.
The 3494 is also intelligent enough to know if someone else is using the
drive that it can't. Drive map all the SAN drives??? What you could
Ken
Try a q node f=d to check to make sure that you have mount points greater
then 0
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Ken Sedlacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Server media mount not possible error condition
Hi ALL:
I
There aren't any errors here. How long did it stop there or did it just
die? Have you checked to make sure your recovery log volumes are available?
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Manoel Braz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Depending on the form of archiving you are doing but we archive to cd's with
no problem.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jon R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Long-Term Storage
Good Afternoon,
I am
Last year I went to Share and the Storage Symposium. For me at least the
Storage Symposium was of more use. Alot of the Share stuff (I went to the
UserBlue segment) focused on operating system and performance things which
are not things that I focus on. My job is storage on midrange which is
What I do an it may take up more space but it gives me a little more
flexibility is I have
/usr/tivoli/tsm/tsmsvr2
/usr/tivoli/tsm/tsmsvr4
/usr/tivoli/tsm/server
I keep a copy of everything regarding each machine in it's own directory
tree including the code. Then I have a rc.adsmserv2 and
How many threads are you using?
What multiplexing are you using?
Are you using compression?
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Poor Performance in SAN with TDP for R/3 AIX
We are using CommonStore for SAP with TSM. I can't think of a way to
configure CommonStore to store 2 copies in parallel to 2 different TSM
Servers but it is an interesting thought. We just use the normal backup
storage pool idea. As far as TSM is concerned this is just another client.
As far
Make sure that under the dsm.sys they exist and then use
dsmadmc -se=servername to connect
-Original Message-
From: Chan, Kien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changing TCP and HTTP ports
Sensitivity: Private
Hi TSMers.
Support
Phone 1-614-308-6709
Pager 1-877-489-2867
Fax 1-614-308-6637
Cell 1-740-972-6441
Davidson, Becky [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 11/13/2001
06:14:09 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Davidson, Becky
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM Server locking
I am currently in the state of my TSM Server is locked. I can do all
commands but things like
q dr
q libv
q
The BKI1208E is The object 'filename' will be retried meaning there was an
error with the object and it will try to restore again. Any errors in the
tsm act log during this time frame? The BR errors are sapdba errors and you
have to go to OSS on them. Are you restoring from before the upgrade?
I am running
tsm server 4.1.2
aix 4.3.3
12 3590E1A in a 3494
TDP for R/3 3.2.06
This past weekend at 16:00 my backup started by backing up my archive logs
to disk. It opened 10 of 11 threads and then did absolutely nothing else.
Other processes started during the night and anything that did not
Do you get any BKI messages or any additional messages? What do your
dsm.sys and dsm.opt files look like?
-Original Message-
From: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM/TDP-R3 Question
-We are
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
