and: QUERY
ACTLOG begind=-1 se=unavailable (SESSION: 421342)
-Original Message-----
From: Killam, Perpetua
Sent: 2019, May, 05 10:25 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: tapes unavailable
Something is marking the tapes unavailable.
I also see this error message
tsm
Something is marking the tapes unavailable.
I also see this error message
tsm: UATSMP09>select count(*) from volumes where access='UNAVAILABLE'
Unnamed[1]
120
Don't know if this is related to the tape errors, because of tape errors or is
this causing the tape
ANYONE HAD ISSUES AFTER UPGRADING TO TSM6.3 FROM 6.2.1 on aix 6.1
Didn't have problems with another upgrade
Opened a ticket with IBM , WILL SEE WHAT THEY SAY
ANR7801I Subsystem process ID is 5112088.
we have 3 aix tsm server instances running under different sudo id's on
one physical aix server.
Is it sufficient to apply tsm code 5.4.3.2 once from 5.4.0.0 and all 3
instances will be updated?
As long as I backup database and config files under those instances
What is the procedure when
Dsm.opt
Dsmserv.dsk
Devconfig.
And so on
-Original Message-
From: Killam, Perpetua
Sent: 2008, October, 17 10:42 PM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: Running multiple tsm instances - applying patch
we have 3 aix tsm server instances running under different sudo id's on
one physical
Anyone has any issues with client 5.5.0.4?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laughlin, Lisa
Sent: 2008, August, 14 12:04 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Windows client failing more VSS request issues
You'll have to
What about clients? What version is stable on 5.5?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Svensson
Sent: 2008, September, 10 10:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER)
Hi,
Do not upgrade to
We had an issue with tsm server coredumping when expiration was run on
5.4.0.0 and it seems to be fine after upgrading tsm server to 5.4.3.2
Anyone else had this ?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
JR Trimark
Sent: 2008, September,
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER)
Go to 5.5.1
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Killam,
Perpetua
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2008 8:57 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER)
We will be upgrading
We will be upgrading our server and clients to tsm server version. Has
anyone experienced any issues with it or should watch out for?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: 2008, September, 10 8:53 AM
To:
thanksalot
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Drew
Sent: 2008, August, 14 11:36 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Total amount of data migrated
Here is a hairy unix command that gets the information from the actlog
Anyone familiar with tsm/gresham and acsls?
I checked in some scratch tapes via acsls
Set scratch
Pool #
Range #
However,
Tsm is not recognizing the newly checked in tapes, any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn
Hi Andrew,
Is there a query to check how much data was migrated from disk to tape
every night?
We copy from disk to remote tape and something of the data from disk
spills into local tape.
I am looking for a query to tell me how of the data is spilled into
local tape? I can search the actlog
a client is receiving this error while trying a db restore... It's a
lanfree client. I'm guessing I have to increase the commtimeout
parameter on the tsm server? Or the storage agent? Not sure which file
to modify on the storage agent?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
86% is bit high for pct.utilized. I had the same problem, and it went
away with adding more space to the tsm db.I am not sure how much
temporary space it requires to complete a fairly large output of an
select statement, but I believe you need more than what you have. I also
believe that its
Anyone has any experience with this? This is bit bizarre to me!
Client tsm version 5.2, tsm server 5.2
Running on windows
Apparently user experiencing problems everytime tsm scheduler service
starts and their reports are written as 0 bytes, we disabled the
snapshot agent on this
HI
Anyone able to use tapeutil with solaris successfully?
On aix, I was able to see physical tape location and move them around.
Please let me know
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004
I read on the newsgroup about this and have added the suggestions on my
dsm.opt file ,but it still has the same errors.
09:27:36 ANS1376E Unable to perform operation using a point-in-time copy
of the filesystem. The backup/archive operation will continue without
snapshot support.
12/15/2004
Great. Thanks
Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0
I'll look into it.
Thanks,
Perpetua
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tsm and snapshot errors
Hi,
I know that we could use these modes depending on the user requests, but i
would like to find out what is the best practice?
i read in 5.2,that it should be shared static? do these parameters also cut
down on inspection time during backups? how reliable is the data when it is
time to
a section for the Solaris servers. Hope it helps.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=pub1sc32910101
Kindest regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Killam, Perpetua
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi Andy,
My confusion is with one particular client (nas filesystem mounted on a solaris
box, don't ask me why they want to do it this way? ;-) ) I have
Sharedstatic mode, but it backups everything it inspects, instead of looking of
changed data(incremental). The user claims nothing much
instead of modified?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Killam, Perpetua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/15/2004 12:12 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
shared static
Would this affect tsm backup
Would this affect tsm backup? It keeps backing up full even the command
says incremental.
Any ideas? Please let me know
Thanks,
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations. Any
Its nfs filesystem ,and this is the syntax within dsm.sys file
DOMAIN /NEWNFS/sup-co-n /NEWNFS/dev-n /NEWNFS/local-n /NEWNFS/syb-dumps-n
/NEWNFS/gfp-ge-n /NEWN FS/gts-eq-n /NEWNFS/cms-es-n /NEWNFS/cms-es2-n
/NEWNFS/gts-dc-n /NEWNFS/gts-mm-n /NEWNFS/sup-db- n
-Original Message-
From:
Of
Killam, Perpetua
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Performance Tuning Parameters
Hi
Anyone familiar with what should be the values to achieve the fastest
backup on Solaris server 5.8 (tsm 5.2) and client options should be?
This is what I have
Txnbytelimit
Hi
Anyone familiar with what should be the values to achieve the fastest
backup on Solaris server 5.8 (tsm 5.2) and client options should be?
This is what I have
Txnbytelimit 25600
Tcpwindowsize 1024
Tcpbuffsize 512
Tcpnodelay yes
Please let me know
Thanks,
Perpetua
is this possible?
We have tsm server version 5.2(TSM_A) running on sun solaris 5.8, and a nas
client (server1-hp ux 11) running tsmclient 5.2
right now: The nas filesystem(NAS) is mounted on (SERVER1) and backed up on to
TSM_A
they want to skip the middle part (server1) and come directly
we only perform full db
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 1, 2004 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Killam, Perpetua
Subject: Re: tsm db extension
Do I need to be aware of anything ?
I already have the allocated logical volumes for tsm db
Is this possible? We have tsm server 5.2 running on solaris 5.8 ,
client(nas filesystem mounted on this) is on 5.2 as well. Inspection
time for 7 million files takes 18hours
The backups are rather slow, so I thought I split up the directories
into different schedules and run them at the same
-Original Message-
From: Killam, Perpetua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 16:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tsm server and nas client
Hi
1.
we have tsm 5.2 running on sun 5.8, our nas tsm client is on hp11 tsm
5.1 version,Everytime we tried to backup, we
version 11? If so, isn't TSM running
under the root account?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Killam, Perpetua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 16:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tsm server and nas client
Hi
Do I need to be aware of anything ?
I already have the allocated logical volumes for tsm db setup.
/dev/vx/rdsk/datadb/tsmdbvol02, but it is not defined as tsm volume
Steps I was going to follow:
1. Backup devconfig
2. Backup volhist
3. Backup db -- ba db devc=3584mclass type=full
4. Define
Hi
1.
we have tsm 5.2 running on sun 5.8, our nas tsm client is on hp11 tsm
5.1 version,Everytime we tried to backup, we are getting these errors
and no backup
PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=106 from fioGetDirEntries: error
message
And no backup performed, any ideas would be helpful.
2. we
Sorry, I was not clear,
I do want to get the element numbers from tapeutil, but not familiar
with Solaris commands.
Is there a way?
Thanks for the help
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004
HI
We have ibm lto3583 library attached to Sun Solaris box 5.8. tapeutil
function is not working
How can we define library and tape drives without element number?
Pls let us know
Thanks
---
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender
36 matches
Mail list logo
