Re: Dsmcad listening port

You don't need to run the dsmcad technically speaking. You can just run a dsmc sched daemon or service. > On Dec 18, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:40:46PM +0300, Efim wrote: >> >> CAD opens random port because the option WEBPORT

Re: help with designing a backup system for Teradata

Do you have DDboost licensed? Could always use the boost plugin and go right to the DD and skip the TSM server. On Jul 30, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Rhodes, Richard L. rrho...@firstenergycorp.com wrote: We purchased a Teredata database system. It currently is in test/dev stage with little

Re: TS3500 and S24/S54 frames with TSM?

Like Paul mentioned, great price point for storage you get out of them. No drives allowed in the frame though if that's an issue for you, I also believe it will require the enhanced node cards and ALMS feature to be purchased from what I recall when we purchases ours. There is the ability to

Re: Redundant Tape SAN

We utilize a redundant tape SAN at our main data centers with multiple host site HBA ports. Using the Atape control and data path fail-over options we have twelve device entries for each physical tape device. Works really well and this is in an AIX/LPAR/VIO environment, we've virtualized the

Re: Redundant Tape SAN

shared drives and 120x LTO1's for each server non-shared in multiple DataDomains. I also have LANFree clients that do not support redundant fabrics. Thank you, Andy Huebner -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike De Gasperis

Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be

To go along with Andy's recommendations I've seen in TSM server 6.2.3.0 where a query occupancy and a select from occupancy don't match up. Might be worthwhile to do a: select * from occupancy where node_name='DC1' and filespace='\VMFULL-HWDDMZOCULARX1' See how they compare -Original

Re: Implementing Encryption

I've never dealt with the EKM but it looks to be a legacy product that will be phased out by IBM. You'll want to look at the TKLM product which does require licensing for the drives that will be encrypting as well as for the actual TKLM servers themselves. We ended up setting up four TKLM

Re: Implementing Encryption

Forgot to include this link from IBM regarding their EKM support. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S4000504 - Original Message - Wanda, As always, thanks for the detailed explanation. However, it brings up lots of questions. With externally-managed encryption, the

Re: TSM for VE 6.4 Questions/Recommendations

Good information Keith, we were really shooting to eliminate any in guest backups if possible with the exception of any hosts that have physical RDM's. Licensing wise are you guys capacity based or PVU based? We're utilizing PVU right now so that was another big reason we wanted to pull the

TSM for VE 6.4 Questions/Recommendations

I posted this up on the adsm.org forum but I'm hoping I get more hits here. We're getting ready to implement the agent at one of our facilities and I'm curious to see how everyone else is accomplishing some things we did relatively easy the old way. How are you scheduling certain VM's at

Select Help

I've played around with this select before and I've never been able to get it perfected. I'm looking for something that will tell me the information below for the active policy set and default management class associations.node_name client_schedules.schedule_name client_schedules.startdate

TSM V6 Instance ID

I was wondering what everyone else has done for instance ID's on their AIX or other UNIX systems for the DB2 instance ID. Are there any issues having the ID with no password but not being allowed to login via telnet/ssh outside of su'ing from root? I was also going to request the file ulimit

Re: Ang: ANR0361E Database initialization failed

Are you sure nothing else was possibly using that raw volume? Wondering if this is the only instance of TSM on this server? I know in my past experience with SUN systems that you can mistakenly grab raw volumes like this that may have been in use by something else. Do you have a q dbv, q logv,

Novell Support

We had a question come up due to some new systems coming online, is IBM continuing to support the Novell platform after the 5.5 version of it's TSM client? The best I can find on the IBM page says it will be supported with the 5.5 client as long as TSM 6.1 is supported but there's no detailed

TSM 6.2 Raw Logical Volume Ownership

I was reading through the upgrade guides on IBM's site and I came accross a section about modifying ownership of any disk volumes so they would be read/write for the instance owner. I'm assuming this is true for RAW logical volumes as well but can anyone confirm? For example I was wondering if